2 north poles and 2 south poles

originally posted by: 727Sky
a reply to: Oldtimer2

The two northern poles with Siberia winning the tug of war I have also read. As far as the pole flip incinerating the earth it would take a big CME from our loving sun to fry the day side of the planet if the magnetic field could not repeal the shock wave and there are people wondering if that is our destiny as a species.. However, the pole flip has happened before and there are plenty of critters and us still alive.. The newest thingy/theory I have heard about is a sun can ever so often produce a micro nova event; call it a super CME where the sun sheds a large part of its' corona.. If that happens I would bet there will be many less critters and us to talk about it.. .

There are many Youtube videos (some more serious than others) about a 12000yr Nova cycle, the last one ending the last ice age. I watched a few of those and the best I suppose are those issued by the Diehold Foundation which is dedicated to studying this supposed cycle. They give an exact figure of 12068yrs between each event using various sciences and data sets. I am open to the idea as a possibility but nothing more. Perhaps all those deep military underground bunkers will come in handy.

a reply to: djz3ro

If that did happen you would be talking complete and utter redistribution of land mass down to the oceans nevermind the rest of the geological activity that would occur.

Might even screw with the rotation of our core, possibly even stopping or slowing the process, thus render the magnetic field that protects us from cosmic and solar radiation defunct.

Quite possibly what happened to mars all the same.

originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: InhaleExhale

No, your questions were condescending. I'm out. Sorry, op didn't mean to get off topic.

I 'm sorry you interpreted it that way.

They were serious questions, you replied with a joke further highlighting ignorance of very basic things.

Sorry I assumed you would have a rough idea of where the sun would be where you are at at midday and could look up and see for yourself if its shifted

Sorry if you were mistaken with what you said about the Eskimo's by what I asked as my 2nd question.

a reply to: Oldtimer2

100,000 yrs ago... your point was frankly pointless.

100,000 yrs from now... your point will have been pointless.

Grasping at points current regarding normal, repetetive and duplicite magnetics, tuetonics, polar shifting... or not.. Is irrelevant to say a 1 million year study of Earth changes.

Whatever is going on... its normal... Whether 2 poles or 12...get back to us in say 1,000 years... and show us how it mattered.

Normal, periodic, even sometimes violent earth changes is what it does... and is supposed to be doing dynamically.

Nice thread though...

a reply to: seeker1963

It is true and I only want to inform those who would like to take care of things they have been putting off this could happen tommorow,I think the public should be given the chance to make that choice

a reply to: mysterioustranger

Obviously you have an opinion because there is unsermountable evidence that the earth axis has tilted and destroyed the earth on cycles,this has been proved by geologist's and physicist's earth being destroyed should be of a concern I would think

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: seeker1963

It is true and I only want to inform those who would like to take care of things they have been putting off this could happen tommorow,I think the public should be given the chance to make that choice

Reading the thread and most posts are asking you to do exactly that.

inform us with what you have.

Not tell us as you have but as you say inform, supply the information that has lead you to conclude such.

That would be informing the public

I hear they just discovered a new kind of magnetism. Singlet magnet.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No. A singlet magnet is a new kind of magnet (something that has been theorized for decades), not a new kind of magnetism. And it really has nothing to do with Earth's magnetic field.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No. A singlet magnet is a new kind of magnet (something that has been theorized for decades), not a new kind of magnetism. And it really has nothing to do with Earth's magnetic field.

It is a new type of magnetism in the way it is formed. It is speculated that it plays no role in earths magnetic field.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

It is a new type of magnetism in the way it is formed.

No, it isn't. The magnetism is the same force.

It is speculated that it plays no role in earths magnetic field.

Unless Earth's magnetic field is produced by exotic materials like a compound of uranium and antimony, of course.

Can OP provide the website, documents, research, YT vids, etc.. that brought this knowledge to you for your conclusion of multiple poles? I think we would like to see that.

a reply to: MorpheusUSA

The actual north magnetic pole is not really at any particular point on the planet, it covers a very wide area. The "north pole" is the average of the entire area. There are two areas of higher strength, one in Siberia and the other in Canada. As the relative difference in strength between the two areas changes, the "north pole" shifts location.

earthobservatory.nasa.gov...
Animated GIF

a reply to: Phage

No, it isn't. The magnetism is the same force.

That is what i am saying it is new type in the way it is formed and also it's characteristics. The force is not exactly the same either. For a lack of better terms and from what i read it is not stable as normal magnetism is in that it comes and goes and states vary much. Yes the force is the same though in theory so far.

So according to National Geographic this is the result of climate change

Climate Change Is Moving the North Pole
As ice melts and aquifers are drained, Earth's distribution of mass is changing—and with it the position of the planet's spin axis.

National Geographic

Our local news brought it up as part of its daily Climate Scare .

Schmidt, who was not affiliated with the study, agrees that human activity has caused "detectable shifts in mass from ice sheet melt and groundwater extraction."

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: seeker1963

It is true and I only want to inform those who would like to take care of things they have been putting off this could happen tommorow,I think the public should be given the chance to make that choice

I get it!

It would be nice to tie up our loose ends by having the foresight to make amends for our wrong doings.

a reply to: Phage

Interesting!

Thank you for the heads up.

TheRedneck

a reply to: fernalley

So according to National Geographic this is the result of climate change

You are confusing two things.
1) The Earth's magnetic poles
2) The Earth's rotational axis

Your source:

Earth turns around an axis like a giant spinning top. The places where that invisible axis intersects with the planet's surface are the north and south rotational poles. Due to Earth's wobble on its axis, these spots drift in roughly decade-long cycles. (All this motion is a completely separate mechanism from the behavior of the planet's magnetic poles, which also reverse periodically over the course of millions of years.)

a reply to: Oldtimer2

The only reason youre concerned is because we are here now. Of course. Like global warming...and droughts...and tectonic movements and ice ages, famines....Earth has always done what it does. My point.
Thanks

a reply to: Phage

Ok,thanks for that.
So is it possible climate change is shifting the North rotational pole as Ice melts and aquifers are drained?