Indian man to sue his parents for giving birth to him ‘without his consent’, wants to be paid fo

A 27-year-old Indian man is going viral after he announced an intent to sue his parents, claiming he didn’t give his explicit consent to bring him into the world.

Indian man to sue his parents for giving birth to him ‘without his consent’, wants to be paid for his life

This my friends is epic. I will buy any one a beer that has heard of antinatalism before. That being it is immoral to bring a child into this world without prior consent.!
This makes my day. I mean my knees are killing me today, so whilst I am soaking them, i am soaking up this cats mentsl illness and feel dsmned good about my self.



How in gods green creation does one consult a freakin baby BEFORE its born! Jeeeeeezus Christmas humans are duuuumb.


www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: lakenheath24

Idiot does not realize that it's his own damn fault for being born.

His sperm won over all the other ones.

Consent is implicitly implied.

a reply to: lakenheath24

I can totally see his point. I wasn't asked either. I don't want money I want an abortion.

Nothing surprises me anymore.
Maybe we should make it a law - make abortion the norm unless the unborn baby gets a lawyer and signs a contract for life.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: lakenheath24

Idiot does not realize that it's his own damn fault for being born.

His sperm won over all the other ones.

Consent is implicitly implied.

RIGHT.
His Dad is off the hook.
Mom and her egg, however, can still be sued.

a reply to: Peeple

Wtf peeps!? Lol. How would you know if you gave permission? Give me one single memory of your life at 6 months old? You cant.
This is code for my life sucks....i suck...i am a loser and i need someone to blame for it other than my sad ass self.

a reply to: lakenheath24

As completely and utterly ridiculous as this is...he needs to lose...if he wins this it's going to set the most idiotic of precedences. He really needs to lose...

Best. OP. Ever.
Oh my god this has made my day.

a reply to: dug88

Its India...he will. Problem is the internet will take this to Europe. Where said future person will win lawsuit.

Think of how many people could sue Trojan for being born.

There have been similar academic trajectories, for example Prof. David Benatar's "antinatalism" espoused in his book: Better Never to Have Been: The harm of coming into existence (2006).

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: lakenheath24

I remember one day my diaper was full of # and I screamed, the mom lady cleaned me up then I screamed again because I got hungry. That went on for about a year.
If you think I am a loser now you should have seen me back then...

a reply to: halfoldman

Haha that guy gets it. Thanks for the link now I want the book!

I hope his mother counter-sues him for him assaulting her during his birth then demands damages amounting to the total cost expenses for raising him, money lost through raising him, assault damages, psychological impact damages and also has to pay all court fees.

Let us pretend for even a millisecond he is on to something...

Does this mean the human race should just die off?

Each person get to leach onto their parents until their parents die? Until they choose to have children?

How can someone give consent to birth? Hell maybe we already do and just don't remember.

People are just ridiculous and want attention.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical


No, no, no. He was an idiot in his past life. This is his karma catching up with him!

All he needs is a shave and haircut and a good karma bath in the Ganges and he will be as good as new!

a reply to: Peeple

You kill me peeps. Id have a brew with you anytime. Just no politicks!

a reply to: lakenheath24

Wow - see the photo? He's needing some bucks for razor blades.

His name sounds very Jewish to me; "cultural appropriation"?

Raphael Samuel, a 27-year-old Indian man

BTW both his parents are lawyers - they in turn will sue or use the Hospital as co-defendants where he was delivered for being too successful in bringing him to life.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

His sperm won over all the other ones.

How could his sperm impregnate his own mother? Asexual reproduction?

I think traversing the birth canal is consent. Now if he were a c-section then he maybe had a case.

This has some implications as to abortion rights. He is making the claim that he was a person capable of consent before he was born.

a reply to: Peeple

Your horse head would pose a problem, going back in "headfirst"