It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
so that means it is travelling Over 3 times the speed of light.
what is it expanding in to?
are there more big bangs?
are scientists stupid? I think so.
why do people thing what a scientist says always true?
originally posted by: buddha
Ok they say that the universe started from a big bang.
...what is it expanding in to?
are there more big bangs?
In physical cosmology, the Big Rip is a hypothetical cosmological model concerning the ultimate fate of the universe, in which the matter of the universe, from stars and galaxies to atoms and subatomic particles, and even spacetime itself, is progressively torn apart by the expansion of the universe at a certain time in the future.
According to the hypothesis, first published in 2003, the scale factor of the universe and with it all distances in the universe, which is known to be accelerating, will be found to increase exponentially.
If this were to happen, the model speculates that eventually in many billions of years' time the scale factor would become infinitely large, pulling even subatomic particles and the fabric of spacetime apart, ending our universe.
The possibility of sudden singularities and crunch or rip singularities occur only for hypothetical matter with implausible physical properties.
originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: buddha
I have no idea, how they figure that. I still believe God created everything, no matter what scientist say. I just don't think it went down the Adam and Eve way. If we exist so can God.
originally posted by: SerenTheUniverse
a reply to: buddha
the universe expanding into a spherical shape would explain it to me and it's still traveling at just below speed of light as the member above stated.
originally posted by: buddha
Ok they say that the universe started from a big bang.
13.8 billion years old. (look it up)
93 billion light years big.
so that means it is travelling Over 3 times the speed of light.
But they Say you can Not travel over light speed!
what is it expanding in to?
are there more big bangs?
are scientists stupid? I think so.
why do people thing what a scientist says is always true?
originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Gothmog
That theory is interesting, and I have read about it. If we are in a simulation, that would be a trip, to discover. I mean look at our games these days. Think of what they would be like in 100 years. Super computers in the future would certainly be able to run simulations.
originally posted by: Gothmog
what is it expanding in to?
In the Universe ?
originally posted by: SerenTheUniverse
a reply to: buddha
the universe expanding into a spherical shape would explain it to me and it's still traveling at just below speed of light as the member above stated.
I don't buy it.
Everything is already in place as it has been for billions of years.
I love science but couldn't care less for what we call scientists these days
The reason this is all a theory is because they can't prove it
All they can do is jump through 30 million hoops and loops and dandydoos to write an article, throw out some 108 character formula and say "See? Told ya."
originally posted by: Raggedyman
How do we know the Big Bang is operating at a constant speed, it might have slowed down to, ahh who knows, it’s all just a guess by scientists who think we should believe their guess
originally posted by: Box of Rain
originally posted by: Gothmog
what is it expanding in to?
In the Universe ?
But this doesn't explain the point that, as you mentioned in your post above, if space is being created ahead of the expanding universe, what exists there before that space is created ahead of it (if there is a "there" there)?
It is rightfully said that the big bang is not an expansion into space , but rather an expansionof space. And that's fine, but what -- if anything -- is outside of that expansion? Or is there even an "outside" that we can talk about.
originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Gothmog
That theory is interesting, and I have read about it. If we are in a simulation, that would be a trip, to discover. I mean look at our games these days. Think of what they would be like in 100 years. Super computers in the future would certainly be able to run simulations.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: iplay1up2
a reply to: Gothmog
That theory is interesting, and I have read about it. If we are in a simulation, that would be a trip, to discover. I mean look at our games these days. Think of what they would be like in 100 years. Super computers in the future would certainly be able to run simulations.
It is starting to become popular although just a few have made it to a Theory stage.
A French(?) mathematician once stated that the Universe could run on only a few lines of code. I think 8 ?
I will try to look it up once I return from the vape shop .