Roger Stone's not guilty plea shows collapse of Russian collusion narrative

Hes just going to be found guilty by a jury then. He lied. about it all...

a reply to: Sillyolme

He lied about asking WikiLeaks if they had Hillary's e-mails. This establishes that there was no collusion. Trump didn't somehow arrange the leak. Nobody did it on his orders. He heard about it on the news, and via intermediaries started inquiring about them.

Seriously, if even USA Today is bailing on the Russian Collusion narrative, then it's game over for this nonsense.

Now maybe we can move onto the proven collusion, where Democrats paid a British intelligence officer to write a dossier smearing Trump, and then used that as the basis for an illegal investigation.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

*Bashes head against keyboard*
USA Today did not write it. It was an op-ed by a former member of the Bush Administration.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Hes just going to be found guilty by a jury then. He lied. about it all...

Seeing you so concerned about someone lying is such proof of karma.
It warms the heart.

a reply to: AngryCymraeg


OK, sorry about that. But my point still stands: the accusations being made against Stone effectively preclude any collusion between Trump and Russia. Because if they were colluding, it would make no sense at all that Trump would need to ask Wikileaks about the e-mails.

The REEE heard around the world
a reply to: xuenchen

At work the lobby always has cnn on. It’s like Chinese water torture.

Occasionally I walk into the lobby and witness some employees REE’ing at the group hate against Trump on CNn.

I can’t believe 10 years ago I read their articles and commented all the time. Was cnn always this bad or has it got worse?


a reply to: carewemust

originally posted by: Tempter
I can't believe USA Today is publishing this story! It's over folks, there was NO COLLUSION!

It's not a story, it's on op-ed. They typically publish a pro and con op-ed every day.

Yes. Because a “not guilty” plea totally always ends with the defendant being “not guilty.”

😉

Manafort and Gates plea Not Guilty in Mueller Probe - 2017

So Manafort is home now, doing the talk show circuit about how terrible the Special Council probe is...cause he said he’s not guilty, right?

Oh?

He’s in jail pretty much forever?



Huh.

But Gates! Surely he has nothing more to do with the Mueller investigation!! Right?

Wait...he’s cooperating to get a plea deal? So, like, he’s not actually “not guilty???”

Gates plea deal full text


Mind. Blown.

🤯

originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
The REEE heard around the world
a reply to: xuenchen

Seriously. Rogers whining is totally epic!!

Lol
a reply to: AboveBoard

a reply to: Tempter

THE BIG LIE HERE IS...If there was anything there we'd know about it.

Why does anyone think this statement is relevant?

If Mueller is pulling together a case of conspiracy against the US that includes others who are as yet unnamed he would not go giving away his secrets in any preliminary indictment.

This does not in any way mean that Stone will not be charged with conspiracy.
This is just what he is charged with now.... subject to change.

always putting the cart before the horse.

a reply to: AtlasHawk

only about 25% of the people who voted for him plan to vote for him if he runs again.
Another reason he is clinging so desperately to his wall only he fails to realize that not getting Mexico to pay for it when that was indeed his signature campaign promise has already cost him votes.

a reply to: Tempter

Mueller is a rogue actor working against the interests of the United States.

He and his co-conspirators should be arrested and frog walked straight to.....

All part of their Russia/UK/Democrat/socialist conspiracy

a reply to: xuenchen

hold fast to that dream fella.

a reply to: Sillyolme

That's OK, thanks to your party pivoting to the far left and having no real candidate for 2020 he'll still win.

Besides, the "home team" has a distinct advantage.

Yeah, your partys far left pivot is only going to cause millions more to stay home instead of voting. You thought a lot of lefties were disenfranchised/uninterested when Clinton stole the nomination (as proven by the internally leaked emails)? Wait 'til you see them in 2020

Hell, if by some miracle you all actually do win... your attempts to implement socialism will only cause what needs to happen (and has been needed for ~150 years) to occur much faster.

a reply to: carewemust

I dont watch CNN but I have not seen anyone say that Stone is cooperating. He has already announced loudly that he will never.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Nope, much like their refutation of Buzzfeed's lies, they are letting you guys down easy.

You all are so invested in this fake narrative and have staked your reputations on it so publicly.... can't wait to see this play out.

Anyone else need a bag of popcorn?

Mueller is done and not a hair on Trump's hide has or will be touched.

Take that check to the bank. It is 100% certain. You all were wrong... debunked... proven false.

a reply to: chr0naut
Why are you posting a meme with a quote that is fake?

a reply to: toolgal462

There is nothing fake about it. That criminal hag Hillary and her bitter criminal cronies RIGGED the Dem primary against Bernie. They even lied about "chair throwing" at some event...

Then, they lied about the fake Russia BS 6 ways from Sunday. Even invented this whole self-described "false flag" Russian bot fake operation down South (targeting you lefties BTW, none of us RW conservatives believe a word they/you all say)

Then what happens? Not only does Clinton illegally circulate the fake invented "dossier" but she/her campaign failed to report that contribution AND they "colluded" with the Russians/British to subvert (which is what they do best) our lawful election. Additionally, thousands of criminal co-conspirators have been engaging in a seditious/insurrectionist conspiracy to overthrow the legitimate President.

Radical trash deserves a needle in the arm. (not talking about the illegal junkie drugs most of them use or support either)