Strange Area In Photograph

originally posted by: lunarrover
Yeah ???

If that "Yeah ???" is about the higher resolution then yes, it has a much higher resolution and anyone that knows a thing about digital images can see that. They can also see that the image you posted has a higher contrast, turning subtle changes into sharp changes, making things look more "square".

I must remember to not bother downloading it

I thought so, as you do not appear interested in the truth.

originally posted by: lunarrover
All you do is a defog edit the contrast and brightness and billion year old jpeg artefacts start appearing wink wink nudge nudge.

Could you please write in a clearer way? My English is not good enough to understand the way you write. Thanks in advance.

JPEG artefacts do not exist on PNG or TIFF (when not using JPEG compression, obviously) images, they exist only on the low quality JPEG images.

So we have geographical landmarks annotated on a photo--that checks out, thank you!

Someone with super-special vision confirmed by board-certified psychiatrists care to post a mark-up photo pointing us blind commoners to where the giant cylinders, rods, pipes, and machines are located?

Cheers and thanks

originally posted by: Shadoefax
a reply to: abeverage

Yes ... perhaps some circles or arrows for us imagination challenged people?

You mean us paradoleia challenged people.

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: ArMaP

All you do is a defog edit the contrast and brightness and billion year old jpeg artefacts start appearing wink wink nudge nudge.

Teehee

And if you photo enhance it 12 times, turn the saturation all the way up, negative the image and then emboss the image, you can even see alien writing on the moon.

I has amazeballs skillz in photoshoop.

/sigh

a reply to: gallop

Why not bypass all of that and go straight to the LRO image

en.m.wikipedia.org...(crater)

a reply to: lunarrover

all apollo missions sill images - are numbered sequentially , the format is thus :

AS - < 2 IGITS [ MISSION NUMBER ] > - < alphanumeric code [ haselblad cassent number ] > - < sequential number [ the unique image code ] >

so AS11-40-5903

is :

apollo 11

cassette # 40

image 5903

and this is a scan of it :



peoples opinion may vary - but i am too lazy to delve into images that were meticulously catalouged - but regurgitated tthe internet as " strange " - without the meta data which makes the job a lot easier

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: gallop

Why not bypass all of that and go straight to the LRO image

en.m.wikipedia.org...(crater)

Because from every non-altered image, it only looks like a crater to me. And I prefer not to go looking for things that aren't there till pareidolia sets in.

a reply to: gallop



files.abovetopsecret.com...

You can't get anymore "NOT THERE" if you tried.

Going by that image from LRO. People are just not as stupid as some would like. I get it tho but think the charade is pretty much over. Either way I got the info I wanted from this thread so thanks guys


Paradoilia is not a confirmed medical term btw, show me a medical study of it and supporting documenation You can't because it is a made up term from a sceptic.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

It's the other way around. Some people see patterns or familiar features, due to pareidolia. To suggest that it's by default actually real anomalies on the moon and literally almost everyone else is not seeing things is asinine.

I.e. when the majority of people disagree with you, you're probably wrong.

a reply to: lunarrover

Going by that image from LRO.

No that image is from your ATS archive.


Link to the LRO image then you can say that.

Paradoilia is not a confirmed medical term btw, show me a medical study of it and supporting documenation You can't because it is a made up term from a sceptic.

Confirmed Medical term?



You want to see a medical study of an English word?



Its a word with a definition, you can read can you not?

open up a dictionary and educate yourself, no need for any medical degree or speaking legal or medical jargon just basic knowledge of how to read words and you will get there.


You can do it

In case anyone hasn't identified it already, it's an Apollo 16 Metric Mapping Camera image:

wms.lroc.asu.edu...

If anyone wants anything identifying in a specific area I would look at the high resolution version above, or look at the high resolution Japanese and Chinese images of the area. India may also have coverage.

i guarantee you won't find any artifical structures in any of them.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

Here is an idea, just go take a look at it.

Some images look like they are made from portland cement? All the different orgs have different quality of the same image, why is that? Something just does not add up. There is absolutely zero consistancy which is a prereq for successful liars.

Just an observation. Like a low level asperger, patterns are how I live my life.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

All manipulators of the truth.

Sorry man I just don't buy it, sumink whifs???

a reply to: lunarrover

Here is an idea, just go take a look at it.

I was trying to help.

Just an observation. Like a low level asperger, patterns are how I live my life.

So now you agree it is Pareidolia and it simply patterns you are observing in lunar dust.

a reply to: lunarrover

If you don;t like the high resolution one at the ASU site. try this one

www.lpi.usra.edu...

it also hasn't managed to be processed to death.

The square you need to download from China is H1-36, you'll find all the detail you want in that and no alien bases at all.

Edit:btw Kies crater(which you linked to) and Kiess crater in the Apollo 16 image are two completely different craters.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

They are in on it and working with NASA tge military space agents.

a reply to: lunarrover

Yeah whatever.

Download the high res full sized images from any source you like instead of low res overprocessed ones and prove there's anything there.

a reply to: lunarrover

Really don't care about what you buy or not, your sense of smell is terrible.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I will take the challenge and post all I have if you like.