KY Prosecutor Confirms: Multiple Investigations Underway Into Twitter Users

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Making threats is obviously not socially acceptable, the problem I see with this is it will get expanded on and soon a simple disagreement with the state could be construed as a crime .

A little like how women can merely make an accusation and it can ruin the life of the accused, even without proof.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Quetzalcoatl14
Agreed, she is (was?) a social studies teacher with the following quote on her LinkedIn page:

She also does not seem to have much regard for border patrol agents:

WordPress

a reply to: queenofswords

I'm wondering where he got that image. The 'blood' is stylized and looks like it was made to have a 'festive' appearance with all the curlicues.

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

This is very tempting to wish upon them, but I think they should face what is fair and just and nothing more or less than the average person would regardless of their level of fame. Sentencing might take into account that they may have greater influence based upon the size of their audience though.

I dunno ... she looks like an Ocasio-Cortez wannabe.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

And this has absolutely nothing to do with, "a simple disagreement with the state." Nice try at deflecting from actual threats of violence against high school boys though.

Anything to attempt to not talk about the very real possibility that someone's child could be injured or killed simply because someone else cannot reconcile themselves with the fact that Hillary Clinton lost the presidency and they've fallen for the false programming of deceitful media.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thought crime here we come...

I'm not exactly sure how that's a "thought crime". It says in the piece that there are laws in place for this and it constitutes terroristic threats in many of the cases.

This is where it begins ,soon terroristic threats will be redefined, it's a slippery slope.

How is this where it begins? Again, there are already laws in place that these people have violated. We just want those laws enforced. There's a reason you can't shout fire in a crowded theater...

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thought crime here we come...

I'm not exactly sure how that's a "thought crime". It says in the piece that there are laws in place for this and it constitutes terroristic threats in many of the cases.

This is where it begins ,soon terroristic threats will be redefined, it's a slippery slope.

How is this where it begins? Again, there are already laws in place that these people have violated. We just want those laws enforced. There's a reason you can't shout fire in a crowded theater...

Yes indeed, the wall will enforce those laws well won't it.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

And this has absolutely nothing to do with, "a simple disagreement with the state." Nice try at deflecting from actual threats of violence against high school boys though.

Anything to attempt to not talk about the very real possibility that someone's child could be injured or killed simply because someone else cannot reconcile themselves with the fact that Hillary Clinton lost the presidency and they've fallen for the false programming of deceitful media.

You mean like that 11 year old girl was smashed by a grown man, and yet that behavior was excused by many as necessary escalation and we have a bunch of smart asses in need of championing... Yeah right...

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

And that has exactly what to do with this?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

And that has exactly what to do with this?

Isn't this a thread about the Covington kids and their subsequent doxing, the poor kids that stood up to an old man?

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

No, it's about possible prosecution of people who've made various threats online to that group of boys.

You really trying to somehow equate or correlate the two situations?

My comments on that topic are there if you wish to discuss that otherwise your continued off topic jaunts are duly noted.



Ah, yeah I had forgotten that thread got closed and not reopened as it had gotten quite heated and some posters had to have their posts moderated.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I guess yes I am correlating those two events under kids are #ing kids, they are dumb as #, and accept they will make mistakes.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

And what mistakes did the boys make that warranted the reception of online threat up to and including death?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

They certainly didn't deserve the vititol thrown at them, however were living in some really messed up reality where media has so much influence it can radicalise people into acting out all sorts of nasty.

it doesn't make it less of a terrible statement to say just because it was said on the internet.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

This is a very key point.

The media has whipped people up into an frenzy and these boys are bearing the brunt of that misdirected emotion.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

I guess yes I am correlating those two events under kids are #ing kids, they are dumb as #, and accept they will make mistakes.

Except, these kids did absolutely nothing wrong, in fact, the opposite, they behaved far better than most adults would under similar circumstances.

If you disagree, either you haven't bothered to watch the full length videos available for a long time and/or read the back tracking by CNN and the other MSM mouthpieces - or you are deliberately choosing to remain ignorant.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
You mean like that 11 year old girl was smashed by a grown man, and yet that behavior was excused by many as necessary escalation and we have a bunch of smart asses in need of championing... Yeah right...

Wtf are you yammering about?

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

They certainly didn't deserve the vititol thrown at them, however were living in some really messed up reality where media has so much influence it can radicalise people into acting out all sorts of nasty.

Again, you apparently are deliberately refusing to examine the evidence - they did NOTHING wrong. Got it? NOTHING. They were actually extremely well behaved, considering their age and the circumstances.

Update

Remember the teacher who doxxed the wrong boy?

DOUGLAS COUNTY, Colo. – The Superintendent of Douglas County Schools has asked the school board to fire a teacher over tweets she wrote last month.

Mountain Ridge Middle School teacher Michelle Grissom has been on administrative leave since January 20th following tweets accusing a student in Kentucky of being involved in a viral video of teens and Native Americans in Washington, D.C.

Douglas County teacher facing termination following controversial tweets

This is the social studies teacher who attempted to doxx the teenager she thought was central in the incident between young Mr. Sandmann and Nathan Phillips. It turned out she was wrong about the boy she identified as being involved in that scenario.



Parents had shown up to a school board meeting and signed up to speak about the incident, but were not allowed to speak on the topic.

Last month, Harvey and a handful of others signed up to speak during the public comment period at the school board meeting about Grissom. He says his request was denied.

“They were telling most people they couldn’t speak at all because we weren’t speaking on the topic that they wanted us to talk about,” parent Brad Wann said.

According to board policy, public comments are limited to items on each meeting’s agenda.

“The system in which to get your voice across is broken and it’s time that we as citizens stand up and do the right thing,” Wann said.

The school, principal, and the school board has been inundated with irate parents calling for Grissom's permanent removal from the district and it seems as though the Superintendent is acceding to their wishes despite the parents not being allowed to speak before the school board.