How would you classify the people threatening HS kids, mainstream left, far-left, alt-left...what?

a reply to: Sublimecraft

The lie is you and your type are better.

a reply to: SocratesJohnson

i reckon the spectrum of politics, you might look towards the rainbow section.

thats where these anti covington catholics are all about.

Got not a God-Darn thing 'bout abortions.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The lie is you and your type are better.

What is his “type”? How do you know him?

If you haven’t met him face to face you don’t know crap.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The lie is you and your type are better.

You do know that there was a thread before the primaries were decided asking members who they would prefer, Bernie or Trump....

Sublimecraft said Bernie.

From what I've seen, there are many refugees in the (perceived) Trump camp.

Many who feel disenfranchised by the Left and the Right.

Not everything is black and white, like you are trying to make it seem.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: SocratesJohnson

They're criminals. Threats are, last I heard, somewhat illegal, aren't they? Many, if not most, crossed state lines in the process...

But I'm sure that nothing will happen. So we rest easy knowing that those asshats won't be held accountable. [/sarc]

This Person used a hurtful word to describe a democrat! Burn them, burn them! And of course the FBI will probably show up at your house this afternoon and take you in for questioning.

oops I did it again

They're called Liberals. Dumbass liberals. The country is chock full of them.

originally posted by: SocratesJohnson
This kind of should be the center of the covington catholic school issue.

The people who are calling for violence against these kids, their teachers, parents, and so forth, where are they on the political spectrum?

are they mainstream left? Are they far left? Alt-Left(is that even a word), twitter left(pretty sure that's not a political philosophy but it should be)

Homeland Security got involved due to bomb threats. Again, who are making these threats. It looks like it's mainstream left. which happens to be the blue checkmarked left.

The list that wants violence, death, torture and rape to a bunch of catholic kids and their family is staggering(feel free to post some screen shots from twitter wishing evil on kids, it's late and i am going to bed), and from the little I read the comments from their tweets, their supporters weren't to offended by them. You think someone would be like, you want a school shooting....let me unfollow you.

Again, the question must be asked, where do you put these people on the political spectrum? Where do you put these people? What politicians do they think share their values?

Democrats have taken a turn so far left that the moderates who didn't follow ended up on the right. It's unbelievable how far left they've gone. The same mainstream left that reported this fake news story is the same mainstream left that STILL hasn't reported the foul, racist language that was coming from the black guys there, nor the lies that the Indian told.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
Threatening kids. For something that everyone knows was fabricated to begin with.
Openly supporting the actual racists and the actual instigators.

Who does that sound like?


Main.
Stream.
Leftists.

“ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!”

It didn't take them long to come out and call Trump the Grand Wizard and extreme racist after this fake news either.

There should really be something that holds these media sources, ALL who reported the sensationalized part, accountable for everything that happens. All the threats. And those who are making these threats need to be arrested for their threats.The longer this type of behavior goes unpunished, the longer they'll continue to do it. These people don't even get a damn warming.

Now all opf this is just my opinion, but here goes.

There are several groups I would outline on the left in reaction to this incident.

1. Left people that waited to judge and are disgusted by this.

I would put this number at around 10%. Not the loudest of voices, but these people are probably traditional democrat voters who are aghast at what they see happening.

2. Left people who jumped the gun on the story but now feel bad

I would say this is probably around 25%. Not good to jump the gun, but we all do at times. Sadly these people still do to their biases (which again we all have) are not calling out the real racist in the incident, and are not near vocal enough about the doxxers making threats

3. Left people who jumped the gun, acknowledge the story was way out of proportion, but still think the kids are bad and focus on that including trying to find more dirt in the kids

I put this at probably around 35%. This group is still really bad in my opinion. Their bias against maga hats and white kids is so strong that even when they see that racist were attacking these kids, they ignore that and still want to tell us its the kids fault for how they reacted.

They are searching for dirt on kids that were attacked by racist, and thats disgusting. Although they are not doxxing or threatening anyone, they use these kids to condemn white privilege.

4. Left people who think the original story was correct, and these kids are terrible racist, but arent issuing threats.

I would say around 20%.

This includes many people in the media. These people are so indoctrinated that they have doubled down on the initial story. these are media people you see writing articles about the smirk of white supremacy, they saw the video of kids yelling "build the wall" (which still hasnt been made public), the reaction to the media being wrong is horrible trump people defending white racist kids, etc.

Disgusting people whose minds are so warped by cultural marxism they cheer for racist yelling at kids as innocent black men. Maybe not issuing threats themselves, but certainly not to upset by them.

5. The left who wants the kids attacked, doxxed etc.

About 10%

Undefendable evil scumbags. And whats worse, this is where a lot of blue check mark Hollywood type people are. These people are not only cheering on violence against kids despite all evidence showing they acted better than the other two groups, but they feel morally righteous in doing so.

They are hypocrites who yelled the loudest that no one could even criticize any parkland students, yet have no problem offering threats of violence against these kids.



Now I think group 1 is great, and group two is at least salvageable if they are contrite.

But thats only maybe 35% of the left.

The rest is so invested in cultural marxism and identity politics that skin color and maga hats are the primary factors in this story.

This is bad enough, but when you realize that the more extreme you get to groups 4 and 5 the more people with cultural power you get, dem politicians, media people, and celebrities, a truly frightening picture emerges.

People with actual power and influence that hate white people and trump supporters so much that they cheer on racist attacking these kids.

a reply to: Grambler

Fantastic insight! Your numbers, the way it would appear from the world today, are pretty damn accurate.

nvm

Grown adults who threaten kids, are insecure losers who can't even express their thoughts or feelings with out violence.

Those HS kids are probably more mature than the foolish wannabes pretending to be adults.

Adults are supposed to set a good example, be a role model and mentor to the younger generations.

One must be the change they wish to see in the world. We do not change others by force, first one must change themselves.

A man or woman convinced against their will, is of the same opinion still.

They should simply be called leftists. One shouldn't call them liberals because they are against liberty. On the political spectrum they are left of Stalin. They judge people as a whole by the color of their skin instead of judging people as an individual by the content of their character. MLK is probably rolling in his grave seeing how most leftists behave & perceive politics today. What they do goes completely against what MLK preached. Today's leftists want segregation. MLK wanted unity of all races. To put this in perspective Trump is on the same point as JFK on the political spectrum. JFK was considered far left in his time & Trump is considered far right today. The difference is the leftist MSM has no respect for the president today.

Do you have any proof anyone is threatening anyone? a reply to: SocratesJohnson

originally posted by: soundguy
Do you have any proof anyone is threatening anyone? a reply to: SocratesJohnson

well for starter we have the kids statements they have recieved threats.

And we can see all over twitter threats to punch the kids, fiure on them, lock them in the school and burn it down, etc.

And of course the school had to close because the police said there were credible threats.

So yeah, I would say there is proof.

a reply to: soundguy

Here we have the 10% as mentioned by Grambler. I would suggest we name this class #Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetard.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Some of you not long ago were championing a grown man Smashing an 11 year old girl now these poor boys are victims, that's a special kinda #ed up...

There was a clear difference in circumstances on those two incidents.

For one thing, the mob of girls was actually surrounding and physically attacking the man. You could see them taking turns hitting him and pushing at him from behind. Sort of like bull baiting, and they had been threatening and woman and her child prior to him trying to help them.

On the other end, you have a closed group of high school boys doing their thing after having been taunted by some Black Hebrews. Phillips inserts himself into this group. No one touches Phillips. At first they chant and clap in time with his drumming. Some have words with his compatriot who is telling them to go back to Europe, and the central just stands there without touching Phillips. There is no aggression.

a reply to: Grambler

There are screenshots all over.

The kids lawyer has given people 48 hours to apologize before the lawsuits start.

The attorney stated he was giving the the libelers 48 hours to correct and retract their smears.

"Everyone now is on 48-hour notice. So by Friday everybody needs to retract and correct any false statements they have issued about these kids. That includes any major member of the media, that includes any major celebrity, that includes anybody with a substantial media platform. If you've said anything false about these kids, they are willing to extend you a 49-hour time period — a period of grace consistent with their Christian faith — for you to, through confession, get redemption and retract and correct and apologize."

The lawyer warned that if libelers don't do this by Friday, they may be "a defendant in a lawsuit because those lawsuits will start to occur next week."

Barnes specifically named Haberman at the NYT for one, but they may be looking at more.

They are scummy idiots..don't give a F about their politics/label.