TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: wanderingconfusion

Wand, there is something SPOOKY about the Katie Meyler bio link in your post... it crashes Internet Explorer if you try to save the page as an archive. I've tried 5 times so it looks like something is in the page coding to stop it being archived.

That's probably more of an indication that you need to stop using IE than the site/article being coded to prevent archiving.

Internet Explorer is no longer supported by Microsoft. Microsoft Edge is the new browser.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: pavil

CNN ran a segment today on the "dangers of deepfake videos".

www.cnn.com...

This indicates CNN is GUILTY of producing them, and is now alarmed that the technology to make deepfakes is becoming so available.

""deep fake technology"" gotta love it 🚬

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

And numerology as well but you are not actually breaking encryption codes.

ETA: Maybe the more accurate description is that you are not getting clear messages but just acronyms that are useless. I mean someone asked if any of the info uncovered could be used in a trial, those decodes wouldn't cut it.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: pavil

CNN ran a segment today on the "dangers of deepfake videos".

www.cnn.com...

This indicates CNN is GUILTY of producing them, and is now alarmed that the technology to make deepfakes is becoming so available.

They're just jealous that they're being out-faked. Who was it that they use to call "The King of the Green Screen"? Wolf Blitzer? Anderson Cooper? I'm talking about the douche who liked to make it look like he was in the middle of a warzone, when he was really back at headquarters.

a reply to: carewemust

That is a bit of a leap. Who do you think they deepfaked?

a reply to: xuenchen

Our favorite CA Rep is deeply troubled by 'Deep Fake' technology. Why so worried Adam

twitter.com...

www.sgtreport.com...

No more hunting parties I guess.


Puts me in mind of this secret society of hunters who were likely present when Justice Scalia was mudered, I mean died.

It's behind a WaPo paywall just paste link in icognito tab.

www.washingtonpost.com... 6/02/24/1d77af38-db20-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html


Eta. Link will not work. Search the article title:

Justice Scalia spent his last hours with members of this secretive society of elite hunters



When combined with Fiona Barnett's account of his death is rather intetesting.

fionabarnett.org...

I may have posted this several threads back or maybe I just read it, not sure.

The memory hole is deep and crowded these days!


Damn TPTB for stopping Jan and the Q wiki.

Would have been so cool to have.

a reply to: daskakik

Intriguing, thought I'd mention it.

a reply to: daskakik

daskakik, genuine question... do you believe that at least some tweets and some Q posts hold secondary messages (=> codes)?

Haspel contradicts Trump on Iran, says they are "compliant" and not seeking nukes.

Just weighing in on a couple things. First, I've seen some discussion concerning "numbers stations", they are nothing new. They have been around for decades. There are folks including myself who follow a part of shortwave listening called UTES. That's listening in on all types of utility stations which include military, shipping etc. That also includes modes like digital, teletype, weather fax etc. Numbers stations are believed to be blind covert messaging to operatives around the world. Back in the day their signals were tracked to a number of countries to include those behind the Iron Curtain. They have never been explained. Enough said about that. A while back Q asked the question to the effect "How do you bring in evidence that you have but cant legally dump?" Looking at the events that have been happening I've got a theory. It really doesn't appear that the Trumpster is trying to defend himself. Its clear that the objective here is impeachment. So lets try this:

A) No real defense = weak
B) House draws up articles of impeachment. They vote, agree on impeachment. Yes, you've been impeached but they have to pass this on to the Senate because they are responsible for the trial and removal
C) Now on trial on the Senate. Everyone who is accused is entitled to a defense in this country. NOW, you get to introduce evidence in your defense

just my $2.17 accounting for inflation

Remember, never interfere with an enemy in the process of self destruction.

originally posted by: CAPT PROTON
a reply to: bluesjr

White Rabbit equals 33 in chaldean numerology. Think of it as calling card. A lot of different groups like 33.

It was the highest energy available, until recently. 44 is the new 33 now. Software upgrade on your DNA...

a reply to: daskakik

One of these days I'll waste hours paging through all of part 2 of the thread just to identify to you which posts from Dash and I were used in court, as per this 0311Warrior post. If those included decodes and/or acronyms then your position will be shown to be evidentially wrong.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

ToL, I for one am still hoping QWiki can go live at some point.

The OIG has a new report out today on misconduct by 1 former and 2 current high level officials regarding contractors.

CTH

Just started reading but that y'all would want to take a look. It is just a brief statement so hopefully more will be out soon.

Q posts certainly have them but Q is the source of the egg hunt so that is a given.

In all of twitter I'm sure some have secret messages. I'm not sure about specific people's accounts and I also don't think you have actually cracked any.

I don't know, maybe I have the wrong concept of secret communications but acronyms to the general public seems flawed. I mean, Q tried to convince his followers that posting a reflection of the interior of AF1 did not constitute a breach of security but for some unknown reason they can't send messages in complete words?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
One of these days I'll waste hours paging through all of part 2 of the thread just to identify to you which posts from Dash and I were used in court, as per this 0311Warrior post. If those included decodes and/or acronyms then your position will be shown to be evidentially wrong.

Don't bother. I won't believe it unless I can see that it was actually entered as evidence.

originally posted by: Bill1960

A) No real defense = weak
B) House draws up articles of impeachment. They vote, agree on impeachment. Yes, you've been impeached but they have to pass this on to the Senate because they are responsible for the trial and removal
C) Now on trial on the Senate. Everyone who is accused is entitled to a defense in this country. NOW, you get to introduce evidence in your defense

just my $2.17 accounting for inflation

Good to see you B60.

This process would not even happen overnight like some folks think. He has at least two years left assuming they did it tomorrow it'd be the rest of his term to deal with it. He'd also have the SC packed...

Assuming it got as far as the Senate is has a right to put on a defense. Exhibit 1: ENTIRE FISA documents will bring down the house, not because he asked for it but because, like Flynn and probably Stone, it would be required per a defense.

If that doc was the end of DJT the NY Times would have leaked it...

For instance, Stone indicted for lying to Congress, with the added show of force.

Clapper- "not collecting data on Americans"



Cue: expert witness...Snowman