TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Joecanada11

Or... it could be one of the possibilities I put up.

How do you brainstorm without thinking up alternatives?

Why does almost everyone seem to leave the possibility that they are being duped out of the mix? I mean, that is also a possibility.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: queenofswords

Because bargaining a second time from a position of weakness always works.

have you ever played stud poker, where 60% of 'the cards' are 'shared'?

and there are quite a few situations where a 2 and a 3 can beat a pair of aces

but that won''t be at the flop

more like at the river

this Is a Game after all, the Silent War Game and the 'blinds' are high

a reply to: JohnnyJetson

But nobody knows what cards the players hold or if they are even playing stud poker.

Anyone yet connect 3/15 with RBG? It happens to be her birthday. March 15, 1933. My husband looked that up for another reason because he thought it would be a lovely SOTU date to dig it in that she's not able to be there.

a reply to: carewemust

"Q" explained the Roger Stone dichotomy fairly extensively.
If you don't "get it" there are historical clues that can be found for tin ladies and men.
If you still "don't get it" I would advise just being patient.
"Q" said we already have more than we know, so lets not start clinging to things like Roger Stone that many of us don't know.

a reply to: daskakik

daskakik, surely that's the whole point of brainstorming? To build up theories and then evidences as to the probability of it being accurate or a dupe...

At what point is it mathematically impossible that it's a dupe?

I get the impression that, for you, the first evidence you don't empirically understand proves it's a dupe? I start from the position of building up evidences that it is true.

We will meet in the middle at some point and place our evidences on each side of the scales!

From my perspective, your weighing plate has 3 or 4 ounces on it so far - mine is into the tonnes and about to break the scales.

I feel like Nicholas Copernicus to your Ptolemy, trying to get you to accept that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

a reply to: hiddenNZ

Have you seen this post, hiddenNZ?

Or this build on it from IAMTAT?

My guts tell me to Trust the Plan - the re-opening was a step in contrasting the rationality of POTUS position against the irrationality of Pelosi and Scumer's.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
daskakik, surely that's the whole point of brainstorming? To build up theories and then evidences as to the probability of it being accurate or a dupe...

At what point is it mathematically impossible that it's a dupe?

At no point. A dupe could have the admin in the fold.

I get the impression that, for you, the first evidence you don't empirically understand proves it's a dupe? I start from the position of building up evidences that it is true.

See you are biased and ignoring all the evidence that proves it is a dupe. Why does it have to be based on my understanding and not just what is?

We will meet in the middle at some point and place our evidences on each side of the scales!

From my perspective, your weighing plate has 3 or 4 ounces on it so far - mine is into the tonnes and about to break the scales.

I feel like Nicholas Copernicus to your Ptolemy, trying to get you to accept that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

No we won't, things will play out regardless of what anyone thinks is valid or invalid proof.

twitter.com...

Here's hoping.

Roger Stone could be bad.

OR his arrest could be part of the plan.

Maybe showing they are not biased before starting arrests on the other side.

Brennan and Comey!

Would be a good prize.

Comey still has security clearance

Brennan and HRC don't.

There has to be a reason for that.

Maybe Q is quiet because the deeds explained for over a year are really about to start rolling.

"Who is really the brains behind the Bronfman trust that pays the attorneys in Nxivm case"

1/25/19

1. Question: Who has been paying for legal counsel for apparently all (or practically all) defendants and/or witnesses in the Nxivm case?

Answer: Clare Bronfman!

2. Question: By taking on the extraordinary role of funding practically all of the defense lawyers, who is trying to control the entire defense strategy of the case?

Answer: Clare Bronfman! But was Clare the designer of this sophisticated, coordinated legal effort?

Surely, such a complex legal defense effort involving precise, coordinated efforts by 20+ attorneys, could not be the result of a strategy designed by Clare alone. So, the next logical question is:

3. Question: Who advises Clare Bronfman?

Answer: Disgraced/previously censured and fined former federal prosecutor, Dennis K. Burke! (Who is now under investigation in the Nxivm case, himself!)

And, therefore, the next logical question to ask is:

4. Question: Who does Dennis Burke take his instructions from, if not Clare and not Raniere? Because Burke didn’t have a preexisting friendship with Keith Raniere.

Answer: The answer to question #4 may be the biggest unanswered question in the entire Nxivm case.

Conclusion: With the final answer to the above questions, the truth is revealed about who is trying to thwart the government’s prosecution of Nxivm, with Clare’s money!

artvoice.com...

"Members of alleged sex cult NXIVM to appear in federal court"

1/28/19

A federal judge in Brooklyn has ordered members of the alleged sex cult NXIVM into court to discuss "issues" with the fund paying for their legal defense.

In a brief order, Judge Nicholas Garaufis directed the defendants to appear Monday "to address issues it has identified" with the irrevocable trust established by Seagram's heiress Clare Bronfman.

Prosecutors raised questions about the trust and whether Bronfman, who is charged with racketeering conspiracy and conspiracy to commit identity theft, established it in order to exert control over her fellow members of NXIVM.

abcnews.go.com...

CAPS decode on POTUS tweet:


NBLBSG = N.B. LifeBoat Survival Game?

The Lifeboat Survival Game is a morality test:

The Lifeboat Game (Morality Test)

There's this passenger liner sailing from Britain to Australia (a nice long cruise). Halfway through the journey it sinks. During the panic and chaos of the sinking process you regain consiousness on some remaining debris with 15 other people. A lifeboat floats up to you all, but it can only support 10 people. Since you found the lifeboat you get to decide the 9 other people who will join you.

1) A Doctor, GP, who has an addiction to drugs and is very nervous (Male/60 years old)
2) A black Protestant Minister, (Male/27 years old)
3) A prostitute, but is an excellent nurse, she has already saved a drowning child and put him on another lifeboat (Female/37 years old)
4) A criminal. Charged with murder and can navigate the boat. (Male/37)
5) A mentally disturbed man, who carries important government secrets in his head (Male/41)
6) A law-abiding salesman. He sells automatic washing machines and is also a member of the Rotary Club. (Male/51)
7) A crippled boy, paralyzed since birth. He cannot use his hands and is dependant on others. (Male/8)
8) A housewife with two children at home (Female/23)
9) A Jewish resteraunt owner, married with 3 children at home. (Male/40)
10) A Teacher considered one of the best in England. (Female/32)
11) A Catholic Nun, supervisor of a girl's school. (Female/46)
12) An unemployed man, formally a proffessor of literature. He has a great sense of homour and is a decorated soldier for his contribution in the last war and was in a concentration camp for 3 years. (Male/53)
13) An Irish man studying to be a pharmicist. (Male/23) And is married to...
14) An Irish woman, studying to be a nursury teacher. (Female/22)
15) An American, he is also a Neo-Nazi and thus hates the Jew. However he has a large box of food which he will throw into the sea unless he goes into the lifeboat. (Male/20)

Rules
6 of the above must die. Just pick 6 and then justify your options.
Don't attempt to find holes in the hypothetical situation (e.g "Who would want to go to Australia?") it's a lot easier and saves space if you stick to the topic.

Whether you eventually arrive at a desert island or a civilised land is purely chance. Thus, you should prepare you choices for both outcomes.

IF this is a viable decode, then what is it saying? Deep state fighting over who is sacrificed and who survives - based on who can best re-build deep state?

originally posted by: WhatTheory
Stone clears Trump. HA HA

BREAKING: Mueller's indictment of Stone clears Trump of Russia "collusion"

I cannot wait for the MSM to report this bit of news. LOL

I made this exact point in the main thread on Stone's indictment. If there was any kind of secret back-channel collusion between Trump and Russia, then Trump would not need to inquire about the stolen e-mails via intermediaries. The scenario Mueller outlines in his indictment only makes sense if the Trump Campaign had no means of communication with any foreign boogeymen.

Same thing with the Trump Tower meeting. We know that there wasn't any contact between Trump and Putin, because if there was then the Trump Tower meeting would never have occurred. The existence of these events are proof of a lack of collusion.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Shutdown ended...no security issues...
...and Pelosi STILL won't allow the SOTU address from House chambers.

What's she so afraid of?

Maybe she's afraid Trump is going to call out members of Congress who are on the drug gangs' take.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

The pic JC used is found on Quill's twitter page. But, for some reason, JC has put a Red Square around his. It's not even done evenly, so I don't think it's just added as a border. It has meaning. Red Square?

Square Symbol Meaning

Structural Symbolism of the Square Implies
Implement a plan,
Build on that plan and
Manifest ideas into our reality.

Colour Red Symbolism - Occult

In occult terms the color red is representative of emotions and fire. The color is often said to symbolize power, hate, warning, or death.

a reply to: CanadianMason

Image seems to be from the quill theater site.

An interesting analysis from the /qresearch/ board; linking 5 Q posts, using a lead from the recent POTUS schedule...

It links the following to upcoming SOTU;

Springfield Armoury,
Shay's rebellion,
battles of Lexington and Concord,
1776,
1787,
"WE MUST FIGHT AGAIN".

(You may need to zoom to read easier):

Here is a take on SOTU...



I would note that last year's was the first of these such things I watched. ThankQ for that. In cranky's lifetime he has avoided all of these "not directed at me" events. From the Q POV is was blistering, the DEMS looked very bad indeed. I expect this will be far more problematic for them if AOC is their new leader in waiting.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Shutdown ended...no security issues...
...and Pelosi STILL won't allow the SOTU address from House chambers.

What's she so afraid of?

Maybe she's afraid Trump is going to call out members of Congress who are on the drug gangs' take.

The buzz is already beginning to circulate that Mexico and the cartels are secretly financing Dems in congress to avoid the wall.
I think we're on the verge of some revelations regarding this.

Just dropping this in to follow up on regarding why certain News organizations may have lost their "funding" and had to lay off workers.

Neo's gab post (gab.com...) lays it out pretty succinctly, especially if you follow all the links. Also read the Wiki layout of "Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of May 10, 2016. en.wikipedia.org...

The last paragraph in that wikipedia page reads:

On 23 December 2016, President Obama signed the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act into law.[12] Supporters of the resolution inside the Defense Department have publicly expressed their desire to weaken the interpretation of domestic propaganda protections, laws which prevent the US State Department from gathering information necessary to develop targeted propaganda messaging and prevent them from explicitly attempting to influence opinions.[7]

So, that covered the NDAA up to the end of 2018 I assume.

Additionally, www.thecitizensaudit.com...


And now here it is Jan., 2019, and all those organizations feeding us BS propaganda, lies, distortions, and misdirecting us have lost their Obama propaganda funding.