It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sabrechucker
Q needs to put down the COVFEFE. Going to be a crazy day, I can feel it
Q 2736 is a copy of the RBG post above. Announcement on her today??
qmap.pub...
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: pavil
Those numbers deleted appear to be actor friends of Smolett who did the so called "attack".
That appears to be a reach. I fail to see how a redacted phone list proves anything simply based on who the guy talked too. It will take much more than what has been reported to prove anything. Maybe they can flip a friend or something but unless they have said people that he made calls too in the area at the time of the crime i would not buy too much into it yet.
If he had anything to hide, it would likely be in the redacted portion. That lets the investigators know where to look for other evidence. Smolett is not too swift. Purportedly, there was some security cam vid that showed these clowns buying clothesline at a local store. I think he wanted some attention and did a Twana-like hoax. Maybe the prosecutor will let him plead out with a fine; Chiraq needs cash and Smolett has some.
BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has returned to work at her office for the first time since receiving treatment for cancer in December. t.co...
originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: pavil
Those numbers deleted appear to be actor friends of Smolett who did the so called "attack".
That appears to be a reach. I fail to see how a redacted phone list proves anything simply based on who the guy talked too. It will take much more than what has been reported to prove anything. Maybe they can flip a friend or something but unless they have said people that he made calls too in the area at the time of the crime i would not buy too much into it yet.
If he had anything to hide, it would likely be in the redacted portion. That lets the investigators know where to look for other evidence. Smolett is not too swift. Purportedly, there was some security cam vid that showed these clowns buying clothesline at a local store. I think he wanted some attention and did a Twana-like hoax. Maybe the prosecutor will let him plead out with a fine; Chiraq needs cash and Smolett has some.
Interesting how you do not seem to favor innocent until proven guilty. I could imagine you the type to want to hang people based on little evidence while chanting we don't need no trial. Sometimes i have a wild imagination though.
From what i can tell this morning they likely have what they need from the other two in regards to their phones and anything else that was at their house.
US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin arrive in Beijing as the March 1 truce deadline looms