It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk
Shultz is an Independent in name only. In any other time in American politics he would be a staunch Democrat. Its just that they've gone so crazy lately that anyone not for total communist is seen as a centrist.
VoterFraud.jpg
www.justice.gov...📁
[Only when the election harms the D party will they claim foreign interference]
Keyword: 'Foreign'
What about Domestic interference?
>Non-Cit votes by county
>Non-Cit promo by county
>Non-Cit org by county
>Targeted districts breakdown by 'Non-Cit' data acc
>Voter irregularities [internal]
>(-2) Laws enacted in battleground areas as test for 2020 (voter roll screening/review of non_votes (D) > ballot pop > track for sign > submit late for count) - vote swing figures + rule of law (new standard of no show vote SC 2019 scope case?)
Why do D's push for NO VOTER ID in U.S. elections?
Why do D's push for OPEN BORDERS?
Find the connection.
Sometimes a MAP helps.
What SC decision (6-3) ruled VOTER ID did NOT suppress votes or deter minorities?
www.reuters.com...📁
What (FALSE) 'narrative' is pushed by D's re: VOTER ID LAW?
Racist?
Voter suppression of minority vote?
When is an ID required?
Should an ID not be required at all (for any reason) given the argument made by D's?
Does the argument 'A NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW would suppress the minority vote' suggest minorities are incapable of obtaining an ID?
When is an ID required?
Which minorities are they referring to?
(illegal immigrants?)
Logical thinking.
If there is a previous SC decision on the matter (pre-POTUS Justice conf), would a NATIONAL VOTER ID LAW MANDATE using the SC ruling of 2008 (+ common sense logic/arguments) as the LEGAL FOUNDATION, have merit?
Is every other country that has a VOTER ID LAW considered racist?
www.newsobserver.com...📁
Will the DOJ support the push instead of file legal challenges as [LL] did in the past?
If the SC ruled in 2008 that VOTER ID laws do not impact/harm or prevent 'minorities' from voting, how could the U.S. 4th Circuit Court rule opposite?
Is the 4th Circuit Court considered LEFT/Liberal?
www.newsobserver.com...📁
Why do D's want POWER at all costs?
One example above.
Logical thinking.
#FactsMatter
You are the news now.
Q
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 15e248 No.5126726 📁
Feb 11 2019 17:00:54 (EST)
If [AS] has seen 'evidence' of collusion and/or POTUS/RUSSIA
illegal activities, as he's stated in the past many times across all D-
arm media networks, why then is there a need to open 'new'
investigations?
What about the so-called 'evidence' already seen?
How is [AS] making open statements re: MUELLER not
investigating POTUS/Deutsche Bank thorough enough if the
MUELLER investigation itself is CLASSIFIED?
How does [AS] know what MUELLER has/hasn't investigated?
FAKE NEWS DESIGNED TO KEEP THE FAKE NARRATIVE IN
PLAY [COVER].
You are witnessing the greatest 'DISINFORMATION' campaign to
ever be pushed by a political party.
Ask yourself, why?
FEAR of what?
The message must be direct.
The WAR is very real.
Q
2693
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
11 Feb 2019 - 5:44:56 PM
twitter.com...📁
Let's actually use 'FACTS':
Step One: Hype an invented threat of POTUS working w/ the RUSSIANS (disinformation campaign).
Step Two: Send FBI/DOJ/CONGRESS/SENATE/C_A/NSA/INTEL/FVEY/etc… to address and investigate the IMAGINARY THREAT.
Step Three: Justify the 'SPECIAL COUNSEL' and MILLIONS OF TAXPAYER DOLLARS SPENT as necessary to protect the public and our election process against an imaginary, made-up, non-existent threat (which really is) designed to protect the illegal activities of many elected officials.
Step Four: Open 'new' Fake & False investigations as CHAIRMAN of the House Intel Comm to retain disinformation campaign designed to keep liberal/D Americans onboard to regain POWER & PREVENT prosecution - Executive Time!
Q
>>5127462
Life Lesson - [AS]
The next time you 'leak' classified information, don't have your phone (or allow phones of the 'unknown' go-between 'students') present.
FISA works both ways.
Q
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk
How do you know the first thing about Shultz' politics at this point? Literally all he has said is that he is against government run health care. I'm not trying to come down on you, but you seem to be talking out of your ass.
more than 500 million births were prevented between 1970 and 2015 (a calculation based on an alternate model of fertility decline proposed by the scholars themselves),[4] some 400 million of which may have been due to one-child restrictions.
Life Lesson - [AS]
The next time you 'leak' classified information, don't have your phone (or allow phones of the 'unknown' go-between 'students') present.
FISA works both ways.
Q