It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Kryties
There is no other way of describing a person who supports investigations without evidence into an individual, their families and friends going back 'as far as necessary'. It's pure fascism... and really does speak volumes.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kryties
Quick question:
What are you afraid they are going to find?
You do know the entire American justice system is predicated on innocence until proven guilty.
Not deeming someone is guilty and putting people through an enema to find something wrong.
It's called a gross abuse of power, IE DESPOTISM.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
RE: www.foxnews.com...
Do you think investors LIKE what the new Democrat-controlled U.S. House is proposing today?
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
RE: www.foxnews.com...
Do you think investors LIKE what the new Democrat-controlled U.S. House is proposing today?
Blaming it on Democrats controlling the HoR is like blaming an oncoming hurricane on someone repainting their house. It's beyond silly.
from the present, back to "as far as necessary"
originally posted by: Irishhaf
from the present, back to "as far as necessary"
doesn't this statement mean that Schiff doesn't think the last 2 years with Mueller has uncovered anything that could be actually useful to get trump?
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kryties
Quick question:
What are you afraid they are going to find?
You do know the entire American justice system is predicated on innocence until proven guilty.
Not deeming someone is guilty and putting people through an enema to find something wrong.
It's called a gross abuse of power, IE DESPOTISM.
originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: carewemust
I will never believe anything the democrats can dream up.I am
sure they will go back as far as they can and find something they
can blow out of proportion.
I wish some hacker group would find and release all documents
on the democratic party and make them public.I wonder how they
would feel being in a bad spotlight?
originally posted by: SKEPTEK
a reply to: carewemust
I don't think Maxine Waters on the brain has thought this through.
How about we investigate her finances? How about Saggin Nancy Pelosi's finances?
Funny how they have become incredibly wealthy being a public servant.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I'm honestly loosing patience with this "game", and would like to see some executions. Is that too much to ask?
originally posted by: gimcrackery
Maxine can shove her investigation up her criminal arse.
a reply to: carewemust
More (if you have a strong stomach) at: www.foxnews.com...
Self-described socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced on Twitter late Tuesday that she will join California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters on the influential House Financial Services Committee, which oversees Wall Street and the housing industry.
California Rep. Katie Porter, Michigan's Rashida Tlaib, Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, and Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley have also reportedly been tapped for the committee by Democratic House leaders, and a vote finalizing their appointments is expected within days.
"I am very grateful for the opportunity to sit on this committee as a freshman, and look forward to working under the leadership of @RepMaxineWaters!" Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter late Tuesday. "Financial Services is one of just four exclusive committees in the House. It oversees big banks, lending, & the financial sector."
She added: "Personally, I’m looking forward to digging into the student loan crisis, examining for-profit prisons/ICE detention, and exploring the development of public & postal banking. To start."