It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: KansasGirl
You were doing great until the last paragraph. Totally unnecessary, and IMO, beneath a "music professional" by leaps and bounds. It comes off as the stereotypical snotty musician attitude most poke fun at.
There is also an alternative that hasn't been suggested. Logically, I'd say letting them literally PLAY with the instrument is probably the best intro you can give, free exploration of it for a while versus diving head first into lessons. It might sound like a dying cat with it's tail slammed in a door for a bit, but a little kiddie DIY time before lessons might strengthen interest.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: randomtangentsrme
In my experience (with people I've met who attended it), Berklee is an empty bucket as a music school. I have no idea (nor do any of the other musicians I work with) why anyone has the impression that this place is a good music school.
I'm talking about Colleges of Music, where you get a hearty, balanced, yet also specialized degree in music, whether it's Music Education (band directors, choir and orchestra directors), Music Performance (you specialize on your one instrument; this degree isn't practical unless you are REALLY good and make the most of the degree by doing everything balls out; most folks who get performance degrees end up going back and getting what they need to fill out a music Ed degree because they don't want to spend years of their life in a practice room for 6 or more hours a day), Composition, Music Theory, Music History, or Musicology. If your school doesn't offer all of these degrees, don't go there. So I'm talking about Colleges of Music within a university.
The best in the US are the University of North Texas, U of Illinois, and Michigan. The one I went to is of course the best, in my opinion. The job I have and had is incredibly difficult to get; extremely competitive auditions by invitation only, and there are only a small number of positions. Yet a large percentage of the positions are taken by alums from my school. π. So I can say for sure that folks who graduate from my school are likely to be able to win elite positions. The band I was in at my school (classical wind symphony) would make two CD's a year. One year we won a Grammy for one of them, so there's that, too. They still make the recordings every year but they're under a different label now (when I was there it was Klavier).
So those three cant be beat. There are some smaller places like Ithica that has a good balanced and rigorous degree program that has put out some phenomenal players the last twenty years, and Arizona State and U of Florida have put out some good players as well.
It can be hard to be a small fish in a huge pond (there were 3,000 music majors when i was getting my Bachelor's), but if a person can use that to make themselves better and eventually rise to the top of all of those phenomenal players, they'll be unstoppable.
What's your opinion on the best music school? When you've asked people the question over the years, what kind of answers so you get? What kind of degree are you thinking of when you say "Music School," and what type of musician do you work with (singers, instrumentalists, classical, jazz, etc).
Learn what paragraphs are and I'd take you more seriously lol.
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
capitalize your damn sentences and we may take you sorta kinda serious.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
Learn what paragraphs are and I'd take you more seriously lol.
originally posted by: openyourmind1262
capitalize your damn sentences and we may take you sorta kinda serious.
Come on dude, have you got some issues with the poster, you seem grumpy?
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: TinySickTears
Sounds like you're on the right track--obviously, it shouldn't be forced to the point of making the child hate the activity, but if we as parents never force something, there is an entire world of things out there to which children will not be introduced.
Sometimes we need to be forced into trying things to realize that we may like something.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: TinySickTears
she wants to learn it with you. But the moment you become pushy it will deter her interests. It needs to evolve naturally as a together thing.
originally posted by: ketsuko
This is truth.
Whatever she does, you will get better results if you practice with her and take the time to be her parent and mentor, another teacher.
You will have to trust the professional to teach her the deep techniques, but she will be far more likely to be invested and enjoy what she's doing if she feels like you are invested and involved too and care about her success.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
i'm torn on this one.
my general way of thought is i dont want to make my daughter do something she does not want to do. she is 6 btw.
i dont mean # like homework. brushing your teeth.
none of the # you actually have to do.
more like extracurricular things.
you know like the dad that makes his son play basketball and he does not want to. i dont want to be that guy.
the flip side is i am the parent and i dont need a reason. just do it.
you know?
my daughter loves art. loves music. loves to listen to music i mean.
music all day. all generes.
i played guitar until i got hurt and nothing for a couple years now i dabble in the bass(so does the wife) as well as the ukulele and the jews harp.
mostly i dont touch them anymore but i still study music. the instruments are still around.
anyway i want my daughter to play an instrument.
i dont want to force her to but i would like her to.
in the end if she does not want to then she does not have to but she is 6. she has no interest in messing with the instruments we have laying around.
so i am thinking a compromise of sorts
i dont want to force her cause its not cool and i dont want to put her off.
so i was thinking put the foot down.
agree. dont agree. i think is is important.
next 3 months we are going to take a 30 minute lesson twice a week. we are going to be serious while we are there and try.
after 3 months if she does not want it then we are done.
it is winter and we do # all for the next 4 months so we have the time.
i figure if she goes and gives it an effort and just does not like it then its over. i can live with that. she is still young
but just maybe. maybe we get that awesome teacher that makes it fun and gets it to her in a way that i cant and she likes it and wants to keep going...
that could happen.
im not talking you will become first chair. im just talking learn an instrument.
what do you all think?
i am just curious here cause i really am torn.
half feel like a total dick for entertaining basically making her go if she does not want to.
but im dad and i want it to happen. thats it.
some parents think this or that is important.
i think this is important.
originally posted by: one4all
..ever seen a kids eyes when a Cobra is sung out of its bag....
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: one4all
..ever seen a kids eyes when a Cobra is sung out of its bag....
no dude. i have not
when i was thinking of things to interest my daughter in music i came up with stupid # like go check out the orchestra and go see the largest collection of pipe organs in the world.
totally didnt think about going to calcutta to catch a cobra show