It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And in the Crimea the parliament also voted
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RussianTroll
We already went over this. Russia's Human Rights Council, which is part of the Kremlin, admitted that the actual referendum only had a 30% turnout. Of that 30%, at most, 50% voted in favor of annexation.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: RussianTroll
And in the Crimea the parliament also voted
After armed gunmen took over the building, and deposed the Prime Minister while they raised the Russian flag? After they placed Aksyonov (whose Russian Union party had a 4% vote share) as PM? A vote taking place behind closed doors with armed guards? A vote which garnered 64 of 100 votes somehow while only 36 ministers were present? Where votes were recorded for multiple members who say they were not there? That vote?
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RussianTroll
I'm not speculating on anything. There were only a handful of countries that officially acknowledged the annexation. These include places like North Korea and Iran. China was not included in the list.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: RussianTroll
Here is the council. They all seem to be pretty Russian to me.
Council Members
Those whom you call "armed militants", together with the police, defended the Crimean Parliament from local gangsters and those who arrived on trains from Western Ukraine. Galicia. By your logic, "armed militants" can be called the US Army, which guards the White House and Congress
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: RussianTroll
Those whom you call "armed militants", together with the police, defended the Crimean Parliament from local gangsters and those who arrived on trains from Western Ukraine. Galicia. By your logic, "armed militants" can be called the US Army, which guards the White House and Congress
Did the US Army recently seize control of Congress and the White House, depose elected officials and replace them with people whose party garnered 4% of the vote? If not, I'm not sure what you're talking about.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: RussianTroll
If armed gunmen (who weren't in this case, by the way, uniformed military officers of Crimea/Ukraine) take over the White House and Congress and depose elected officials and install fringe politicians as President/Congresspeoples, I both anticipate and fervently hope there to be a response from "armed gangsters" in this country.
originally posted by: RussianTroll
A political analyst tells how he first came to Russia in 1994 and saw people who, in his words, felt "humiliated to the last ounce of their vital energy."
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: RussianTroll
The "gangs" installed a new unelected government and had a vote for annexation that violated several provisions of the constitution. Attempting to play role reversal and pretend they were the legitimate government protecting itself is pretty blindly nonsense to anyone who paid the slightest attention.
I don't have anything against Russians. It really doesn't enter into it. I met several russian servicemen in the mid-90's through various exchange programs. I still vaguely remember a drinking song in Russian. I found them remarkably similar to everyone else in the West. I find it hard to even hate Putin. He's very predictable in his self-interest. I can even admire the realpolitik of it all. Very pragmatic and barely bothers masking with pretense like Western democracies. They took Crimea for the same reason they do many things -- because they could and knew the West didn't care enough to actually remove them. Very pragmatic if less than ethical. I'm not sure I even blame them necessarily. But that doesn't mean I don't recognize your fertilizer. Why bother with the fake reasoning that everyone with half a brain sees through?
originally posted by: rickymouse
I have no problem with the Russian people. Most of them are probably just like us...
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: CriticalStinker
And I didn't agree with the Iraq War either. The whole War on Terrorism is a sham.
So what's your point with bringing Iraq up?
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: RussianTroll
I wrote a paper on it, and detailed with other indicators why I believed this. I got a D because my teacher was an avid Bush supporter, and at the time, Bush and Putin had very close ties, and Russia was considered an ally.
3 years later, Russia invaded Georgia, then Crimea 7~ years after that.
So a referendum in the Crimea, that had 96% of the population wanting to leave Ukraine and align with Russia, is a Russian "invasion"?