It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: mightmight
You are assuming that no country would ever attempt a surprise attack. It sounds unfeasible I suppose, but it very well could happen.
Hell, in 10 years Japan could switch sides for all you or anyone else knows.
Actually the US has relied on SAMs for national defense for more than a decade now. The only concievable military threat (besides all out nuclear war) to the mainland is some rogue state staging a ballistic missile attack. That is why the US is trying to build up Ground-Based Midcourse Defense. Not to mention all they do with Aegis BMD.
And the US hasn't really relied on SAM's for national defense for God knows how long now. Maybe we have secret SAMs that I am not aware of.
originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: JHCap
Using your definition of "building", the US have been working on building 6th gen for about six years now (maybe even longer).
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: moebius
There's also Fun With Definitions. China has a different definition of generation than we do, as does Russia apparently.
Currently, the United States has two projects: the Air Force's ‘Penetrating Counter-Air'—a long long-range stealth fighter to escort stealth bombers—and the Navy's FA-XX. So far, Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, and Northrop-Grumman have unveiled sixth-generation concepts.
originally posted by: Woody510
a reply to: JoHms
Its really not anymore unfortunately. Also can you give me next weeks lottery numbers seeing how you can see 100 years ahead?
originally posted by: Fools
a reply to: mightmight
You are assuming that no country would ever attempt a surprise attack. It sounds unfeasible I suppose, but it very well could happen.