Kids from ‘right-wing’ families must be re-educated: German govt.-backed brochure

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
Hey look, another unneccessary thread about Germany!

What do you guys want?

A Germany which does not fight against far-right and (at least pre-)neo-nationalism? Really?

Germany? ... Remember?

Go ahead and lecture other countries about their relationship to nationalism and the far-right. We do our thing here.

How do you fight it? Quashing dissent?

Surely you know history well enough to know that The Austrian was imprisoned for trying to overthrow the government of Bavaria? They made a martyr out of him. He used that experience to build up his credibility. He wrote a book about.... His struggle....

Germany of today still bears hallmarks of a totallist society---and that's the true indicator of fascism. Quashing all dissent is not how you inoculate the people against fascismus. Repression creates a breeding ground for it. Their rise to power was fueled by the people's fear of communism, another face of totalism.

America shook off its own brush with the millennialism of the German-American Bund. And did so because America was an open society.

Who was on here 10+ years ago when we predicted the male being feminized? ATS actually predicted all this stuff, but we got one thing wrong back then: No one saw them injecting this mass brainwashing into schools and Universities the way they have, back then we predicted it'd be through chemicals, etc. We were wrong to think on such a lowly level—they went straight for the kids and our educational institutions.

a reply to: Lulpin

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

The Germans have a real knack for marching into classrooms and forcing people to subscribe to a certain set of beliefs. They’ve been doing it since the 1930s. It was anti communist and anti Jewish then. It’s anti white and anti conservative now.

Today, the chant across Germany is “Wir mussen die Weissen ausrotten!”

I just think that conservative people in general have more restraint and civility. They compose themselves more properly and use proper etiquette. I also feel that conservatives tend to be more educated... and not by schooling alone. Conservatives also tend to think things out a little more. Admittedly, conservatives do tend to be stingy and often could care less for the homeless and the downtrodden.

Man... That reads almost like an astrology sign

What about the liberal side?

My father included.... I see the total opposite and even to the extreme. The downtrodden is all, is everything, nothing else matters and we need to make more regulations that keeps them downtrodden so we can help them. (no, sorry, the conservative side does that just fine on it's own). Say what ya want, it's just how my eyes see it and I try not to be judgemental as much as I can help it but the mind wanders...


Then there are those which are far worse... They just go by whatever the people they like decide. You know... They'll take your word for it if they like you.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
You can't be serious. Nazism is something that Germany doesn't want to be associated with. So much so that it's illegal to sport a swastika in their country. It's definitely not the left who is sporting swastikas these days.

You are right.

The left is sporting something that is far more evil, bloodsoaked and oppressive than the Swastika.

The Hammer and Sickle.

The most oppressive and disgusting ideology ever dreamed up by man.

The Nazis never committed half the crimes and atrocities that Communists have.

The Fascists are back people, and they’re far more powerful than they ever was before, lock n load

The scary part is... they were never German, they were never Adolf Hitler... They were the globalist elites who engineered every major war

a reply to: StallionDuck

This is how I see it: People are people. Some are liberal, some are conservative. Both tend to be greedy and covetous, but those traits manifest in different ways. We were having that discussion in the health care thread and I came up with this example today to sort of explain what I mean. There was a leftist in there wining that none of us cared at all that he and his would suffer, and we were saying that wasn't true, but that none of us would let our families suffer to give he and his what they wanted.

I thought of it this way:

Right now, through unusual circumstance, my kid has two coats. One is an older coat we would have ordinarily donated, but it has a stained and scuffed sleeve, so I didn't know what the donation places with do with it. Since it's still fundamentally sound and I didn't want them to throw it out or something because of the stain and scuffing, we kept it on. He uses it as a play coat.

But ... if I noticed a kid of the right size consistently showing up at the bus stop with no coat, I'd be happy to let that kid have the extra coat. We don't really need it, and that kid wouldn't need to freeze when there is a perfectly good coat for the taking. But if my kid only had 1 coat? Well, I'm a lot less inclined to take that coat from my child and see if he can last the winter in a light fall jacket so that other kid has a warm winter coat.

I might be inclined to try working with his parents to source a coat though.

But this leftist is like the person who sees all the other kids in the neighborhood with coats and his own without and covets what they have that he doesn't. And he assumes that because those kids have coats, that their parents are just rich ... rich enough to provide a coat for his kid too, and that they just won't because they're stupid greedy and don't care. When the reality is that some kids may have parents with the luxury of an extra coat to give up like we have right now, some kids may have parents rich enough to provide it, but not every kid does.

Most of the time and most kids, only have 1 coat. Some kids have parents who save for a long time to provide that coat. Some kids only have that coat because their parents go to thrift stores and get it secondhand or maybe they only have it because they have an older relative who could pass it on to them. The point is that while the leftist sees all these "rich" kids with coats, he has no idea what their reality actually is.

It doesn't matter though, he demands a policy that targets all those greedy rich kids, so their parents will have to provide a coat for his kid. And because of that and circumstances some of those kids are in, because of the greed of the leftist, some of those rich kids will inevitably lose their coats in order that his kid can have a coat.

originally posted by: Swills
Then I just decided to Google Translate that website that housed the PDF and went to their about page

originally posted by: Swills
Clearly I did do a little research and am looking for answers so back off with attacks because they aren't warranted at all.

you did very, very little research, mate.

oh look, english version:
www.amadeu-antonio-stiftung.de

Amadeu Antonio Foundation
foundation... ok.
Anetta Kahane
Stasi... ok.

looks right, right?

as her wikipedia page says:

In 2015, the Amadeu Antonio Foundation followed the German Ministry of Justice's invitation to take part in a task force against hate speech on social media.

you'll need google translate for that one though

3 years later and that's the result.
Kahane and her foundation are out of their minds? that's their right.
but it's one thing when some left-wing foundation with unhinged activists publishes a load of BS, and another when the government pays for such BS, effectively supporting it.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Thank you

I’ve just never equated the word “Arab” with “Islam” before. One is a nation/territory and the other is an ideology.

They are separate unless of course you are a little dense and just lump the two together because trying to think anything else would be too complex. It's a little bit like getting some of the more stupid people on ATS to understand that not everything and everyone doesn't fit into the compartmentalised view of the world, but I guess it keeps them off the streets.

i was searching for some finance reports, no luck. what i did find though...

www.pattberg.org...
judas.watch...

this isn't some one-time brochure by some extremist foundation, this is an organized effort with huge backing.

also, let's not forget about this:
www.amadeu-antonio-stiftung.de...

Open Society Foundations - is anyone surprised to see Soros involved in this crap?

I think this is nonsense

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
...
Germany? ... Remember?

Go ahead and lecture other countries about their relationship to nationalism and the far-right. We do our thing here.

Except for the fact that "nazis" were, and are not as a majority right-wing. Hitler was voted in Germany by the left, not by the right. The "liberals" of the time, alongside most of the left, voted for Hitler and in turn for the nazis.

People like yourself want to claim that "nazi Germany was right-wing" because of nationalism, but you forget that they were socialists as well, a new branch of socialism known as "fascism." The same thing with Mussolini. He was a lifelong socialist, whom like Hitler, invented a new branch of socialism known as fascism.

As a matter of fact, in socialism and communism there are two branches as it were. Those who adhere to the "international" form of socialism or communism, such as Lenin/Trotsky, and those who adhere to the "nationalist" form of socialism or communism such as Stalin, Hitler, and Mussolini.

Also, the claim that "because Hitler/the nazis were against other socialists" does not make them less socialists. Throughout the history of socialism and communism there have been socialists who were opponents of other forms of socialism, and the same thing occurs in communism. National Socialism is one of the branches of socialism, and it is not "right-wing" as the left keeps on claiming.

I have also read/heard from several leftists that "being militant" made Germany right-wing, but this is again false, as in general socialism/communism also tend to be militaristic, such as China, Soviet Union, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Burma, Vietnam, etc, etc.

Even today we see many "socialist or communist" groups show that they can be "militaristic," and resort to violence such as "Antifa, BLM, etc."

originally posted by: uncommitted

They are separate unless of course you are a little dense and just lump the two together because trying to think anything else would be too complex. It's a little bit like getting some of the more stupid people on ATS to understand that not everything and everyone doesn't fit into the compartmentalised view of the world, but I guess it keeps them off the streets.

First of all, I never said that Arab and Muslim are the same... However, when it comes to Arab socialism/Islamic socialism it is the same thing. It is socialism as seen in the Muslim world and under the tenets of the Quran.

Don't worry that brochure is just a waste of money. It is so boringly written that if puts you to sleep right away, I bet no one gets over page two.

originally posted by: infolurker

originally posted by: Lulpin
I'm a bit tilted right now, but let me let you guys in on something.

We're in the middle of WWIII right now. And it's not a war of weapons and conventional means. It's a war of culture, and ideology. And right now, all of us on the righteous side of good and sanity are losing. Until we realize what's going on, and say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, to these people that want to completely destroy humanity, and free thought, and reaching conclusions without the state absolutely dictating what we should or should not believe in, we're absolutely doomed.

Time is running out, and if things continue as they are now, by the the time we put our foot down it will be far too late.

Then the beast was allowed to speak great blasphemies against God. And he was given authority to do whatever he wanted for forty-two months. And he spoke terrible words of blasphemy against God, slandering his name and his dwelling--that is, those who dwell in heaven. And the beast was allowed to wage war against God's holy people and to conquer them. And he was given authority to rule over every tribe and people and language and nation.

Which God were the blasphemies spoken against?

Vengeance is a trait of a beaten or jilted God...seeing as all of them have lost battles things could get confusing lol ?

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Thank you

I’ve just never equated the word “Arab” with “Islam” before. One is a nation/territory and the other is an ideology.

Arabic peoples are most definitely the originators of Islam...even the Jews are according to specific sources.

Why would you not equate the words together, must be some racial fluidity thing going on.

originally posted by: infolurker

originally posted by: Lulpin
a reply to: infolurker

That's a really interesting quote. What verse is that from?

Funnily enough I've been an atheist for most of my life, but with all the "weird" stuff going on around the world these past years I've been moving more and more towards Christianity. I really should get around to reading the bible (and pretty much every other religious text) one of these days.

Revelation 13:6-8

Let your thirst for knowledge lead you to Yashua.

Yashua is most definitely not a quest to find.

Knowledge can lead anywhere..not limited to a finite repeater system.

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
Hey look, another unneccessary thread about Germany!

What do you guys want?

A Germany which does not fight against far-right and (at least pre-)neo-nationalism? Really?

Germany? ... Remember?

Go ahead and lecture other countries about their relationship to nationalism and the far-right. We do our thing here.

I'm wondering how many times Germany must be destroyed before the ghost of nationalism doesn't make some people pee their undergarments. Self-loathing is a recipe for disaster and cultural suicide. Keep going and there won't be any Germans left in 100 years to worry about.

Indeed they are being had again...then again this has all been scripted nicely and appears to have to play itself out...Again.

originally posted by: TritonTaranis
The Fascists are back people, and they’re far more powerful than they ever was before, lock n load

The scary part is... they were never German, they were never Adolf Hitler... They were the globalist elites who engineered every major war

Keep going farther back..no human wrote these scripts.

Cannot beat the enemy when believing humans have the say in these decisions.