TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -14-

originally posted by: airforcerulessky

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: airforcerulessky

originally posted by: Mike Stivic
I have a suggestion..

If you want to debate the bible perhaps you should make a thread on it or take it to pm's.

It's highly frustrating as a lurker to watch this derailment unfold.

The focus could be on dissecting the crumbs,
But instead , even those of you who (supposedly) believe in Q, spend page after page feeding the derailment.

You are doing a disservice,if Q turns out real or Not,there is a lot of good digging in this thread. Some solid connections made.And that's why it gets the page views.

Don't help bury the gems in the dung.

For the record I'm still on the fence.


Respectfully,
~meathead

Absolutely. Dask is always the culprit tricking people into his/her stupid, senseless, meaningless, off topic, one line responses. People wake up! Stay on topic and let Cranky take over.

Not to play devil's advocate, but dashakiks responses are no more stupid, or meaningless than a lot of others' (read: pro-Q peoples') responses. If people expect everyone to get along, let's learn some equality, and quit going at each other with grade school tactics. What if I told you there is a way to coexist in this discussion, respectfully, with alternative views and opinions? Would you believe me, or would you continue being you? If the latter is your choice; then you're part of the problem, not the solution.

I expect everyone to focus on information. That is why we are here. To share information and not try to SELL our beliefs. I rarely post bud and what pisses me off is stupid off topic crap. Let the regular fantastic minds on this discussion thread do the thinking.

Bold emphasis clearly mine. It's a discussion thread, you highlighted that point above, yes? A discussion often involves banter from both sides. If you're not a fan of the opposing opinions and/or interpretations, perhaps you should ignore them, much like everyone else does. I'm not saying you're wrong in your frustrations with it -- there are a lot of off topic posts that get through in this particular thread -- but that's the job of the moderators, not you, nor I. I, and I assume others, also get frustrated with it, but it is what it is. Ignore and move on.

You say you want to learn and grow, and not debate useless opinions, yet everyone who posts here -- on both sides -- is doing nothing but offering their useless opinions and/or interpretations of Q drops, and Q themselves. It's useless because no matter what we say in this forum -- nothing will change. Either Q is real and the plan with unfold as they want, or Q is false and there is no plan to begin with. Nothing brought forth in this discussion thread means anything in the grand scheme of things. Even if the opinions and viewpoints put forth are correct, on either side, it changes the outcome 0%.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Thanks Rel. Substantial filesize increase.

Seem familiar?
caesar-cipher

a reply to: crankyoldman

So what is 2015?

2015 is when it all started.
The decision was made then to go with a Donald Trump POTUS run instead of a military coup.
I believe the decision was arrived at because of the BO implants in the military at key points that provided an insurmountable hurdle to the coup plan.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

en.wikipedia.org...

A red herring is something that misleads or distracts from a relevant or important issue.[1] It may be either a logical fallacy or a literary device that leads readers or audiences towards a false conclusion. A red herring might be intentionally used, such as in mystery fiction or as part of rhetorical strategies (e.g., in politics), or it could be inadvertently used during argumentation.

The term was popularized in 1807 by English polemicist William Cobbett, who told a story of having used a kipper (a strong-smelling smoked fish) to divert hounds from chasing a hare.

a reply to: carewemust

Care, whenever there is mention of the title "Acting" X my mind is drawn back to Q post #461:

What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?
Q

Is this hinting that people in these acting positions move the chess game forward?

originally posted by: LurkNoMore

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: 40CalTone
Bait expends ammunition.
EVIL has no place here.
Q

So do guys at the shooting range.

Evil isn't asking for permission. Been here since the beginning of time. Built into the world by the creator (if you are into that narrative).

I’d say the Q Team is doing a jamboney job in the short time they have taken up the battle of Good vs evil!
Plenty of drops shining LIGHT on evil.

You've got it , and I agree completely

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I know that there , is, the other side. Big step right there.

So do I. There is no god there. At least not how that one book describes him.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: carewemust

Care, whenever there is mention of the title "Acting" X my mind is drawn back to Q post #461:

What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?
Q

Is this hinting that people in these acting positions move the chess game forward?

Acting: Following the script written by another.
Acting: Not actually in charge, taking the formal position but without power.

In both cases the acting suggests that all is not what it seems from either Q's perspective down, or from ours up.

a reply to: JohnnyJetson

Q says they are fighting evil and satanists.

The book of Job shows that god is tight with satan, to the point that satan is allowed to walk into heaven whenever he likes.

Just pointing out the contradiction in the narrative.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: carewemust

Care, whenever there is mention of the title "Acting" X my mind is drawn back to Q post #461:

What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?
Q

Is this hinting that people in these acting positions move the chess game forward?

Good point. Mulvaney despises Trump and the feeling runs mutual. He will not last long and both know it. Just another broker brought in to do a specific task then exit. Mulvaney is a wrecking ball.
What they have in common is both hate BANKS.

Enjoy the show!

a reply to: crankyoldman

So a quick look at this picture turns up something of a mystery.

Link to Pic



Arlington National Cemetery has an Explore feature that allows you to locate the headstones of everyone buried there.

In the image above, I am able to locate the following:

1. Roger J Wells
2. Julian Clemente Chase
3. James Talbot Kolb (found by process of elimination, only two last name Talbott, not Talbot, so assume it is the middle name as there is only one Jesse Talbot anyone)
4. Patrick Delaney Feeks (only one Feeks listed, so I assume I got it right.

All four above are buried in an are marked 61 on the map.

Where I'm puzzled is that I cannot, for the life of me, find a Jesse Wade with that headstone.

The only Jesse Wade anything is a Jesse Wade Stites, and the Headstone doesn't match.

Not only does the headstone not match, none of the information for Stites makes sense.



Anyone care to explain what the heck I'm looking at here.

The headstone looks like a marker for several marines KIA in Hemland Provance, but it is not the Infinity headstone shown in the pic. If anyone can locate it at the official Arlington site, I'd appreciate it.

ETA: The headstone that does list Stites has an Eagle as the approved religious engraving above his name.



The list of Approved Religious Symbols for US Military Grave markers is at the link.

ETA(Deux): The dates are OK. I read it as DOB 1998. Yikes!

Ummm.

JW?
Is this one for you?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: JohnnyJetson

Q says they are fighting evil and satanists.

The book of Job shows that god is tight with Satan, to the point that Satan is allowed to walk into heaven whenever he likes.

Just pointing out the contradiction in the narrative.

I don't think they're separate entities to be honest. If Jesus is God, and God is Jesus (reincarnate?), then one could likely assume that all of the angels, including Lucifer, are more like branches off the big tree ("God"). The branches (Angels) have strength (Godlike powers) but not as strong as the trunk (God).

If "God" denies access to one of his "children," "God" is therefore denying himself access in small amounts. Then there is the speculation that Lucifer is the "God" portrayed in the bible because of all of the carnage and death reaped upon the populace. Common misconception that Lucifer is evil, and I truly don't believe that, although I'm not a believer in general. Lucifer is the punisher of evil. Lucifer's job is to punish those who have sinned and haven't repented for those sins. If Lucifer is the punisher of evil, how can he be evil himself?

I tried to make as much sense that I could, so pardon me if any (or all) of that is nonsensical.

originally posted by: 3n19m470

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: crankyoldman

Like to try this device on the soulless psychopaths starting with the inventor.
Luciferians be damned

About halfway down I found this to be of interest:

One example of a test to determine whether a person is a Luciferian comprises a video clip of an ice skater performing in a competition. Everything goes flawlessly until, at the very end, a mistake is made during a jump and the skater falls to the ice—all hope of winning the event is gone. A Luciferian will experience pleasure and satisfaction from this. Accordingly, the Luciferian's neurophysiological processes 12will register pleasure over the skater's misfortune which may be identified and quantified using the medical instrumentation 20. On the other hand, a non-Luciferian will feel sympathetic and empathize with the unfortunate skater. Unlike the Luciferian, a non-Luciferian's neurophysiological processes 12will not register as pleasure for this stimulus.

[0049]

Another example of a test to determine whether a person is a Luciferian that may be given is to have the subject view a film of human torture. Instrumentation 20 will reveal that a Luciferian subject viewing a torture movie is experiencing a pleasure response. Further, external stimuli (i.e. not included in the torture movie) such as a door slamming will not elicit much response, if any, from a Luciferian subject. A Luciferian may be enjoying the scene too much to divert attention to other things. This may also be due to a low startle response typical of sociopaths. In contrast, when a non-Luciferian views a torture movie, pleasure centers in the brain are not responsive and may even diminish from a previous level. A non-Luciferian will exhibit a greater response to external stimuli such as a door slamming. This may be due to a desire to direct attention elsewhere rather than on the uncomfortable scene in the movie. The preceding examples are merely illustrative and any other criteria for defining the scope of a Luciferian.

[0050]

A test to determine whether a person is a Luciferian may comprise elements designed to identify a person's true physiological response to stimuli. A Luciferian may fear discovery and may attempt to outwit a test that would reveal his true character. A Luciferian may try to control his responses, possibly by disinterest or unresponsiveness to certain types of stimuli or possibly by mimicking responses he feels would be appropriate from “normal” people. Accordingly, a test may have obvious stimulus S test elements (e.g. questionnaire, movie clips, pictures, etc.), but a test may also incorporate stimulus S test elements which are unobvious. A test may contain stimuli that a subject does not realize are part of the test. There may be unobvious test stimuli that are being administered before, during, or after, the obvious test elements. Unobvious test stimuli may be of any type including visual 14, audio 16, tactile 18, multimedia 19, and combination 21. For example, unobvious test stimuli may be subliminal audio or video signals, a slamming door, a person tripping on a sidewalk while visible to a subject through an outside window, or any other stimuli that may be administered to a subject without the subject's recognition that the stimuli is part of a test. 

I didn't read the whole thing, (EDIT- just to clarify though, I DID read the entire portion I quoted) but, I don't think this invention causes any pain or harm to the person it is used on. It reads their reaction to being exposed to certain stimuli.

It SAYS it is a machine to "tell if someone is a Luciferian, and if they can be rehabilitated".

But wait a minute... This is an elite Hollywood sex cult. What are they doing "rehabilitating" Luciferians? Are they secretly "good guys"?


Hmmm. Well. I SUPPOSE, a device such as this could ALSO be used to make sure your Luciferian Cult is not being infiltrated by Bible Thumpers... "Oh, you're one of us, huh? You enjoy torturing humans and seeing them tortured?" They can test you and detect if you are grossed out or feel sympathy for the on screen victims. If you were raised Luciferian these automated reactions will have been ground down to nothingness by repeated exposure to such material.

They can find the right person for the right "job". And they can root out pretenders and infiltrators and wannabes.

what I find 'weird' is why anyone would want to Patent such an idea/concept?

originally posted by: 3n19m470

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: All Seeing Eye

The interesting point is that god, supposedly being omniscient, would have to ask.

Also, how does satan just "stroll on up" from hell?

Knowing everything is boring. You'd like to challenge yourself. But how? Its like everytime you pick up a videogame, all the GodMode codes are automatically entered in and theres no way to remove it.

Well, luckily you are God so you can do anything, including temporarily (or permanently, you Are god, you Can do Anything) limiting your own powers and abilities.

You could even divide yourself into two opposing personalities just to see which one wins. Each with their own strengths and weaknesses.

You could even divide yourself into trillions of lifeforms for the 1st Two MegaPersonalities to fight over.

You could entertain yourself forever, devising the most epic battles and dramas.

Like imagine if you had unlimited memory and power for the ultimate open-world MMORPG computer game, that spans entire galaxies, billions of years of time, leveling up from an atom to a molecule, to a living cell... up to the modern era. Trillions of participants. No lag, miniscule glitching.

Could you resist setting up the ultimate game? With countless side quests, near infinite characters, all kinds of powerups, levelups, skills, occupations...



I think it was an ATS Member's signature where I found this quote which I will paraphrase to the best of my memory:

"The greater part of human suffering comes from the fact they take seriously what the gods made for fun."


Anyway, this thread isnt about the existence of God so I will not go into it any further than this single post.


How does Satan stroll on up? From Hell? Is that were Satan is/was? Hell? But Satan said he just got back from walking the Earth. Hmmm.

At what point did Satan enter Hell?

Maybe you've just been watching too many cartoons and believe that your cartoons are a sufficient source of Biblical knowledge to give you the authority to comment. In truth, your Biblical Knowledge is so sorely lacking, you don't even know what questions to ask, and the questions you do ask are heavily laced with false assumptions.


Why didn't your post just say "I don't believe the Bible has much Truth or Wisdom to offer" Or "I don't believe in the Bible" or something like that? Thats basically all you were trying to convey, no?

well said

and yes, most of us are "gods" and we have One Choice to make in this Game, "who are we going to play with, ourselves Or with 'the team' . . .

and as we know, there's no "I" in team

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Good point about the file size increase! Excel files start to become slow and inefficient around 20MB. Not surprising though... for example - 1 section alone of the gematria tab has 1452 cells; each of which has a formula 51 lines long!

I'm going to have to start spending sometime finding smarter ways to reduce some of the formulae sizes in large data arrays. That and removing some of the older unused tabs.

Caesar cyphers - yes, one of the foundation stones of the cryptex. Fortunately our sheet is both more sophisticated and more flexible now... evolution to aid the revolution.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: carewemust

Care, whenever there is mention of the title "Acting" X my mind is drawn back to Q post #461:

What makes a movie GOOD?
GREAT actors?
Q

Is this hinting that people in these acting positions move the chess game forward?

Good point. Mulvaney despises Trump and the feeling runs mutual. He will not last long and both know it. Just another broker brought in to do a specific task then exit. Mulvaney is a wrecking ball.
What they have in common is both hate BANKS.

Enjoy the show!

I see your comm line getting a clear signal

Ho this is going to be so Sweet

a reply to: dashen


Re: Jesse Wade Stites:

Marine Cpl. Jesse W. Stites
Died January 19, 2012 Serving During Operation Enduring Freedom
23, of North Beach, Md.; assigned to Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron 363, Marine Aircraft Group 24, 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, III MEF, Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii; died Jan. 19 in Helmand province, Afghanistan, when the CH-53D helicopter he was riding in crashed.

thefallen.militarytimes.com...