TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -14-

a reply to: Sillyolme

You are so right!!!!

Nobody uses doublespeak on Twitter, that's a fantasy!

No codes ever by anyone.

Thanks for helping me to understand.

Dbl so meeem

a reply to: ErrorErrorError

The only sealed indictments so far have been on trump associates.
That and redacted memos protecting ongoing investigations one of which is a criminal case the other so secret that it is entirely redacted.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Ha, yes that too!
Weird how AgarthaSeed posted that IMAGE and then less then 2 hours later Q posted same IMAGE in #2566.
Aside from the obvious uniqueness due to the location I wonder if this image is hiding something in plain sight?
OR
It's not so much the image itself but a message based on location. ""THE WORLD IS WATCHING.""
OR
It's nothing and Q found it just amusing but then again we know better.

On a personal note of interest, my neighbor who is retired Air Force but Active AF Reserves makes frequent trips to Antarctica (during pole summer months) on a C-130 outfitted with Ski's. He flies out of a AFB in NY, the only base in the country with these special C-130's that fly to South Pole. Might be this specific location given the large building in bg. He says there is much more activity (scientific/military) going on than what most people think. One of his remarks was, they can do stuff down there and not have to worry about being bothered by left wingnuts, various laws and left/right activists.

ETA: I see this was covered...need to catch up first.

a reply to: SmellyOlPee

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: wanderingconfusion

You're digging up so many links Wand!

Can I ask if you're storing them in a network diagram to visibly show the web?

If not then maybe a spreadsheet of the links should be kept, that can be sorted on person or entitiy.

No kidding! I need a whiteboard the size of a football field to visualize the bigger picture.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ErrorErrorError
The only sealed indictments so far have been on trump associates.

SO FAR that have been revealed.

originally posted by: 3n19m470
Wow his PR guy should be fired... at any SECOND Q could give "orders" and they would be followed as if it came from Trump.

Record voters in the midterms so it must have worked to some extent.

I don't think the keyboard warriors are really going to follow orders that include more than wearing a shirt or holding a sign but even if they did Trump would just react to them like any other group.

You are a fool if you believe Trump and all the people around him would be okay with this situation. It doesn't even have to be Trump. Anyone close to him or anyone mentioned in the drops (sessions huber horowitz) could speak out against it, so you think they are ALL being controlled by Trumps PR team?

Controlled by the PR team? No, probably a direct order Trump. That still doesn't make it "The Q Team" as indicated by the drops.

The SWAT guys boss obviously didn't agree with what he did or was feeling pressure from elsewhere. *shrug* Q offered the guy a job, he could speak out and say the offer was a hoax. *shrug*

By the way, Pence deleted the pic. How is that not disavowing?

Q didn't offer a thing. He posted a couple of links that are available to anyone. Typical Q BS. A real job offer would have been one of the agencies contacting the guy directly.

What is it that you think I read wrong? Muzzleflash's post or yours?

Muzzleflash's, of course. I said it right in my first post to you. How could you have read my wrong when I hadn't posted any?

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: daskakik

I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.

If a "fervent follower" is not a "worshiper" then what is the distinction?

Healthy skepticism?

On a different note, can anyone summarize the predictions that "Q" is making in this OP?

Not being a "follower" I find most of this very cryptic and confusing.

I may "follow" the Kardashians and buy their products (I don't ), that doesn't mean I worship them.

See the difference?

The phrase was "fervent follower" not being a "worshiper"

fer·vent
/ˈfərvənt/Submit
adjective
having or displaying a passionate intensity.

fol·low·er
/ˈfälōər/Submit
noun
noun: follower; plural noun: followers
an adherent or devotee of a particular person, cause, or activity.

worshiper
/ˈwərSHəpər/Submit
noun
noun: worshipper
a person who feels great admiration or devotion for someone or something

I believe "fervent follower" and "worshiper" are interchangeable in colloquial speech.

If possible I would still like a translation of what "Q" is predicting near-term.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.

Figure of speech. Do you trust the plan? That takes faith. It involves devotion even if it isn't technically worship.

Also, 8chan followers are way above Q's ATS followers.

a reply to: 3n19m470

Actually, it does and not only creeps go to church for socializing.

The point of course was that just because you are not fully invested in Q, it doesn't mean others are not.

a reply to: 3n19m470

I wasn't asking for an explanation. I was pointing out the flawed logic.

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: daskakik

I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.

If a "fervent follower" is not a "worshiper" then what is the distinction?

Healthy skepticism?

On a different note, can anyone summarize the predictions that "Q" is making in this OP?

Not being a "follower" I find most of this very cryptic and confusing.

I may "follow" the Kardashians and buy their products (I don't ), that doesn't mean I worship them.

See the difference?

The phrase was "fervent follower" not being a "worshiper"

fer·vent
/ˈfərvənt/Submit
adjective
having or displaying a passionate intensity.

fol·low·er
/ˈfälōər/Submit
noun
noun: follower; plural noun: followers
an adherent or devotee of a particular person, cause, or activity.

worshiper
/ˈwərSHəpər/Submit
noun
noun: worshipper
a person who feels great admiration or devotion for someone or something

I believe "fervent follower" and "worshiper" are interchangeable in the colloquial speech.

If possible I would still like a translation of what "Q" is predicting near-term.

Pretty sure I used the terms exactly right, and the person questioning it needs a lesson in basic English.

interesting graphic.

a reply to: Sillyolme

And it didn't auto-correct because it is a real word.

a reply to: daskakik

When you start throwing around words like worship and cult they bring certain connotations. Which is it? Is it a figure of speech, or are we in a cult?

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
Ohhh what have we here????

www.urbandictionary.com...

It's also a style stitching patterns.

Code is in the patterns.

😎🚬