Federal Grand Jury To Hear Evidence - World Trade Center 9-11 Was Controlled Demolition.

a reply to: neutronflux


Silver probe at the atomic level. collapsed to dust

//
Read a little about:
Protection against corrosion

outside aluminum - inside steel construction - add 30 years ... (aluminum gets fist / nut - big holes) ... slow process ... where is the aluminum?

during the collapse you get the same effects, just a little more complicated. (silver run through the steel)

//////////////////////////////////////
wikipedia:
... the Montreal Protocol by calling for a complete elimination of CFCs by the year 2000. By the year 2010, CFCs should have been ...

Many years ago, I read about the refrigerator (air conditioners) of the Twin Towers. Gigantic "Chlorofluorocarbon CFC" construction. CFC no longer allowed ...


The towers were not a refrigerator like your grandma's have one.
These were industrial plants, and therefore the coolant had to be changed.
(Government authorities: 1 year extension no problem = exemption until 31.12.2000 //
2 Extension: No, they said on 1.1.2002 something else had to be in there)
Did they changed the medium - and does anyone know the exact formula (the exact electrochemical potential of the new medium)?

I have zero information about that topic, but have anyone exact information about the CFCs...

a reply to: loocstkb

You know the towers did not collapse to dust. The core columns had to be cut from the foundation. Load after load of structural steel and rubble was taken to lay down yards for sorting, examination, and documenting.

How many chunks of WTC are on display around the world?

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Why do you post falsehoods that damage your credibility?

Have you ever asked yourself the same question?

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Why do you post falsehoods that damage your credibility?

Have you ever asked yourself the same question?

Than provide a quote of what you think I posted was false with supporting evidence and arguments.

Let’s start with the below for the WTC nuke fantasy

Based on what evidence? Zero evidence of a detonation with the force to cut steel columns. No video, audio, seismic evidence of an event relating to nukes. The bottom of the core columns of the towers had to cut from the foundation to be removed. No breaching of the slurry walls surrounding the WTC foundations. No damage to the bed rock the would have prevented the building of the new towers. No evidence of fission products. No radiation levels above background for the area.

Nuclear warheads actually take constant monitoring and PMs to ensure their usability.

Where was the control center for initiating the detonation of the fantasy nukes.

The only conspiracy theory more idiotic and less credible than WTC nukes is Dustification.

Sad to see the nuke crowd fall for the charlatans of the truth movement, pure pseudoscience, and pure fantasy. People believing in fantasies like nukes killed the credibility of the truth movement.

a reply to: neutronflux

Every post you make is an example of you posting falsehoods and nonsense. It's been going on for so long that you no longer have any credibility.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux

Every post you make is an example of you posting falsehoods and nonsense. It's been going on for so long that you no longer have any credibility.

Then quote what is false with evidence that shows it was false.

You cannot because there is ZERO evidence of nukes at the WTC. The is ZERO evidence of WTC planted pyrotechnics.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

True or False. For WTC 1 and WTC 2, after the complete collapse of their floor systems, there were still core columns standing?

I'm going with True

What is in this picture still standing

A stick?

Seriously, do you even know what WTC1&2 cores where?

The WTC Cores As Seen In Construction Photos

a reply to: democracydemo

Again

So....

There is video evidence that shows, “significant portions of the cores of both buildings (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) are known to have stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse.“

Thank you to mrthumpy to posting pictures of the core columns still standing after the collapse of the floor system of one of the twin towers.

Richard Gage has not pursued a redaction from Skeptic Magazine that called him out on his Lie.

The American Welding Society documented the physical samples of floor connections from the twin towers that shows they were bent downward or sheared away from still standing vertical columns.

There is zero chance any CD system would have survived the jet impacts and fires to initiate the collapse of the Twin Towers as captured by video from multiple angles.

a reply to: democracydemo

Let’s see if this post a picture will work?

a reply to: democracydemo



Upper right hand area of the picture. Looks like more than a stick of vertical columns standing after the complete collapse of the tower’s floor system.

a reply to: democracydemo

a reply to: democracydemo

So we have gone from this:
Me

Six, the core columns fell after the collapse of the floor systems.

You

Based on what fact not yet debunked?

You keep obsessing with this false claim. As it is the key driver for global natural collapse for both towers you can not it to be false.

I can understand and feel your passion in this matter, but the admit nothing, deny everything atmosphere you create leaves you blind to what is actually observed.

Core first, rest follows.

To pictures of core columns still standing to validate

The lower portions of both buildings' cores (60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) remained standing for up to 25 seconds after the start of the initial collapse before they too collapsed.[44]

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Making your claim of:

Core first, rest follows.

A blatant falsehood with no supporting evidence with the existing evidenced showing after the collapse initiation the floor system collapsed first with the vertical columns toppling in the wake of the floor system failures.

originally posted by: democracydemo

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Why do you post falsehoods that damage your credibility?

Credability: "the fact that someone can be believed or trusted". Quotes from Wikipedia [44] and skeptic.com. Is this credability?

Are visual, actual, real-world, true observations false?

Yes or No?

From your own posted video....

First the collapse of the floor system


Second picture, the vertical columns toppling in after the floor system collapsed


Notice a large block of vertical columns still standing on the left side of the collapsed tower

a reply to: carewemust
I've said this before, and I'll say it again.
The 9/11 plan is a 2 fold, double edged sword.
There is the initial goals achieved from reactions to the event itself.

...then there will be goals achieved from reactions to the official realization of the reality of the conspiracy behind it.
If America were ever to erupt into absolute chaos... A guilty verdict in this and/or the following cases.

The sheep will follow along predictively.

a reply to: prevenge

Too bad no one has been able to prove your second point.
How many decades does it take??

Too bad nobody has been able to prove the official narrative....

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: democracydemo

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Why do you post falsehoods that damage your credibility?

Credability: "the fact that someone can be believed or trusted". Quotes from Wikipedia [44] and skeptic.com. Is this credability?

Are visual, actual, real-world, true observations false?

Yes or No?

From your own posted video....

First the collapse of the floor system

Second picture, the vertical columns toppling in after the floor system collapsed

Notice a large block of vertical columns still standing on the left side of the collapsed tower

Smoke!

As i stated in the YouTube description "Shows section of the perimeter structure standing."

Notice the void of Core Structure on the right side.

This is a hollowed out building.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Looks like core columns to me.

originally posted by: democracydemo

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: democracydemo

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: democracydemo

Why do you post falsehoods that damage your credibility?

Credability: "the fact that someone can be believed or trusted". Quotes from Wikipedia [44] and skeptic.com. Is this credability?

Are visual, actual, real-world, true observations false?

Yes or No?

From your own posted video....

First the collapse of the floor system

Second picture, the vertical columns toppling in after the floor system collapsed

Notice a large block of vertical columns still standing on the left side of the collapsed tower

Smoke!

As i stated in the YouTube description "Shows section of the perimeter structure standing."

Notice the void of Core Structure on the right side.

This is a hollowed out building.

Looks like the core falling after the floor system in the center of your posted video to me...