Criticizing Migration Could Become Criminal Offense Under New UN Plan

Sounds like the UN is getting more like a dictator than anything else. I think they should just disassemble the UN and the countries exile their UN diplomats. I think that the south pole is a good place to send them.

originally posted by: infolurker

MEP has warned EU citizens they could be “jailed” for criticising migration policies if a new United Nations agreement is acted upon.
“One basic element of this new agreement is the extension of the definition of hate speech.
“The agreement wants to criminalise migration speech. Criticism of migration will become a criminal offence.
“Media outlets that give room to criticism of migration can be shut down.
“The compact for migration is legalisation of mass migration.

“It is declaring migration as a human right so it will, in effect, become impossible to criticise Mrs Merkel’s welcome migrants politics without being at risk of being jailed for hate speech.”

Do human rights only work in one direction?

What about the human rights of the residents?

Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Israel, Poland, Slovakia and Switzerland have already stated they will not sign the agreement.

At last some sense ...... Please let TM not hang around for too long -

she's liable to sign anything!

One of the “guiding principles” of the document asks for a “whole-of-society approach” to promoting mass migration, including the role of the media.
Governments are asked to “promote independent, objective and quality reporting… and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants”

Sounds more like a dictatorship than a government .....

# Free speech? gone

# Free press/media? gone

I wouldn't necessarily believe anything the Express says about anything.

They have a long tradition of publishing entirely fictional stories about things the EU 'might' do.


THE EU MIGHT SNEAK INTO YOUR HOUSE AND STEAL YOUR CARPETS!

THE EU MIGHT BE LIVING IN YOUR SHED!

THE EU MIGHT BORROW ALL YOUR GARDEN TOOLS! (And never give them back!)


The 'might' word carries a lot of meaning in the tabloid world.

F--- the UNa reply to: infolurker

originally posted by: rickymouse
Sounds like the UN is getting more like a dictator than anything else. I think they should just disassemble the UN and the countries exile their UN diplomats. I think that the south pole is a good place to send them.

That's exactly what the writers of the Express wanted you to think and feel.

With their almost certainly fictional story.

Think on how you're all being manipulated here.

Don't think and feel what the billionaire owner of the Express paper wants you to think and feel. Resist!

a reply to: infolurker

Free speech may be the least of their problems. British MEP Janice Atkinson is claiming that the UN Compact on Migration would result in Europe being swamped with 59 million new migrants in the next 6 years.

Call to action: stop the signing of the UN Global Compact for Migration
4:48


But it gets better! There's more! The UN’s Refugee Pact – which is a totally separate suicide pact – is allegedly even worse.

Warning : The UN’s Refugee Pact is even worse than its Migration Pact and both will be signed in December

In parallel with the highly criticised migration pact, the UN has also prepared a refugee pact. Both these treaties are intended to be signed at the conference in Morocco on 10-11 December. Even if the pact is not legally binding, it refers to obligations. Thus, a kind of soft laws that restrict the sovereignty of the countries. Some of the points included in the refugee pact are as follows:
• The refugee concept is extended to people affected by climate change and environmental destruction (paragraph 12).
• Every four years starting in 2019, a global refugee forum will check and produce an index for how each country has lived up to the agreement’s obligations (paragraphs 17-19).
• A global academic network with universities, academic associations and research institutes will be established to create opportunities for refugees for education, research and scholarships (paragraph 43).
• Promote a positive attitude towards refugees being transferred from one country to another (paragraph 90).

It is not only the UN that works actively to bring about changes in migration issues, but also the EU and other actors. A relevant element is the EU document which concerns the promotion of relocation of refugees within the Member States.

The document uses terms like “compulsory measure”, “legal instrument” and “hard sell”, which suggests a binding character and that the authors of the document have recognised the difficulty of convincing the public of the proposals.

In this document, the EU has also calculated the maximum absorption capacity of each country and concluded that, for example, Germany is estimated to have a capacity of 274 million people and Sweden of 440 million (Table 12).

a reply to: infolurker

I'll be darned...

More clap-trap from the UN to ignore? Sweet!

For those who actually wish to deny some ignorance today, here's an interesting breakdown on which tabloid newspapers tell the most lies about the EU, and how many stories have been thoroughly debunked:


www.economist.com...

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: infolurker

Free speech may be the least of their problems. British MEP Janice Atkinson is claiming that the UN Compact on Migration would result in Europe being swamped with 59 million new migrants in the next 6 years.

This would be the same Janice Atkinson that got kicked out of UKIP for the astonishing feat of being too racist even for the UKIP party?

Who got kicked out for lying on her expenses claims forms?

Who sends angry messages harassing journalists?

She's a piece of doggy doo. Don't believe a word she says, she is a lying liar who lies. The UN Declaration for Refugees and Migrants is intended to develop a global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration.

It's actually designed to restrict and control the uncontrolled migration we see at the moment, through a number of measures. Including investments in the home nations migrants are coming from, to encourage them to stay at home and have good lives there instead.

originally posted by: Painterz
For those who actually wish to deny some ignorance today, here's an interesting breakdown on which tabloid newspapers tell the most lies about the EU, and how many stories have been thoroughly debunked:


www.economist.com...

roflmao Owned by George Soros!


Edit, not owned by Soros but worse yet, Lynn de Rothchild...

originally posted by: Painterz
For those who actually wish to deny some ignorance today, here's an interesting breakdown on which tabloid newspapers tell the most lies about the EU, and how many stories have been thoroughly debunked:


www.economist.com...

I see the *Daily Mail* is top of the graph, However that is old news,

there is a new editor now and over the last couple of weeks it is very

noticeable at the change in tone, the are backing T.M. is now being backed

with some fervour.

a reply to: infolurker

Doesn't sound like they are finding many other signatories, hopefully it stays that way.

a reply to: Painterz

From the OP's link

The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration was approved in July by all 193 member UN nations except the United States, which backed out last year, and is due to be ratified formally in December. Salvini Salvini said Italy will not sign the declaration (Image: GETTY) The ministry said: ”Foreign Minister Miroslav Lajcak has decided, following today's vote in parliament, to resign.”

Slovakia's Prime Minister Peter Pellegrini has said his government would "never" accept the pact because of its take on migration as a generally positive phenomenon, which contradicts Slovakia's will to distinguish among the migrants.

Besides Bratislava, other European Union members like Austria, Hungary or the Czech Republic shunned the pact, while Switzerland delayed its decision.

Maybe your dream won't come true.

originally posted by: Painterz
For those who actually wish to deny some ignorance today, here's an interesting breakdown on which tabloid newspapers tell the most lies about the EU, and how many stories have been thoroughly debunked:


www.economist.com...

From the Global Compact

OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public
discourse to shape perceptions of migration

c) Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet-
based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on
migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and
advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets
that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of
discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media

Sounds like the media will be "guided"in its reporting.
So sad Canada is signing on

originally posted by: markovian
have fun with that slow slide into becomong a 3rd world country

I 'think' visually ...... so I see the whole of Europe with those vast 'crocodiles'

of people landing ...tents up on every piece of parkland and private gardens

bedrooms used in shifts (one out/ one in 24/7 no kidding I've seen the reality

TV programmes) overcrowded and all that goes with it.......


Then I see vast swathes of countries/land deserted derelict and unkempt

just going to waste and wonder......

Two problems 1) overcrowding 2) wasted space. /smh.

a reply to: fernalley

Canada has lots of space. They can live in North American Siberia. How many of those tropical migrants will move to the Arctic Circle? Greenland needs people, is Denmark signing?

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: infolurker

In this document, the EU has also calculated the maximum absorption capacity of each country and concluded that, for example, Germany is estimated to have a capacity of 274 million people and Sweden of 440 million (Table 12).

Why would Sweden sign on when they took so many and are shipping a bunch out? Heard Germany is infighting about this. Must go look to see what Canada's quota is

Apparently migration is a human right, but free speech isn’t.

The U.N. is a damn joke.

originally posted by: markovian
have fun with that slow slide into becomong a 3rd world country

Not before civil war happens. You do realize that right?

Their plan to elevate themselves to World Government and Overlords can't get up if there are people who can oppose them...which is us in the West with the knowledge they exist and know their plans. The poor black African only wants a free meal and a cosy life doing nothing but putting their hand out.

Of course they will vote for the overlords who give this to them.