Saying “Men Aren’t Women” on Twitter Now Classified as ‘Hateful Conduct’

Will this be construed as 'fake news' too or will the far left accuse this website outing them as being worse than CNN? Are opinions and information now only allowed from specific outlets ?

I'd really like to know. What websites are adequate for the left, I wouldnt want to upset any more of them on here.

Twitter’s crusade against “hate speech” has vanquished yet another meany face. A prominent Canadian feminist says that the company flagged a tweet she wrote which meekly suggested that men aren’t women. Isn’t Twitter fun? Meghan Murphy, editor of Canada’s leading feminist news portal, Feminist Current, was recently informed by Twitter that two of her tweets had violated the platform’s rules against “hateful conduct.” One of the offending tweets stated that “men aren’t women,” while the other asked: “How are transwomen not men?”

This is #ing bull# @twitter. I'm not allowed to say that men aren't women or ask questions about the notion of transgenderism at all anymore? That a multi billion dollar company is censoring BASIC FACTS and silencing people who ask questions about this dogma is INSANE pic.twitter.com/dul6iOdbaz —

Meghan Murphy (@MeghanEMurphy) November 15, 2018 “This is f*cking bull# @twitter. I’m not allowed to say that men aren’t women or ask questions about the notion of transgenderism at all anymore?” Murphy tweeted. “That a multi billion dollar company is censoring BASIC FACTS and silencing people who ask questions about this dogma is INSANE.”

Link

a reply to: MrPopularity


I read a little snip about this I think yesterday. From someone that leans left but also is very conservative I can say with complete certainty that "jegs" is the only site I trust.....
That and "the onion" of course.

You should mudpit it if your gonna diss people, it's more fun.

Is anyone surprised that social media is actually social engineering used to divide everyone?

It keeps all the sheep chasing their tales and not paying attention to the 50%+ and climbing in taxes and crap wages while a few fheads get rich.

Twitter and Farcebook are leftist social engineering operations. The longer they exist the more evident that truth will become and people will start leaving in droves. My opinion but I would sell their stock while the getting is good. Their days are numbered.

originally posted by: CharlesT
Twitter and Farcebook are leftist social engineering operations. The longer they exist the more evident that truth will become and people will start leaving in droves. My opinion but I would sell their stock while the getting is good. Their days are numbered.

Great point.

Is there a way to see how many shares are being traded at any point in time.

If there was, I would bet that shares are being traded in large numbers. As usual, the Mom and Pop investors will be the ones getting burnt.

The writing is on the wall and has been for some time.

P

a reply to: pheonix358

well they are tanking anyway but tech is in a bubble from what I hear and I wouldn't doubt it, Cisco is still probably a good bet though and VMware is pretty big wonder how their stock is doing?

originally posted by: pheonix358

originally posted by: CharlesT
Twitter and Farcebook are leftist social engineering operations. The longer they exist the more evident that truth will become and people will start leaving in droves. My opinion but I would sell their stock while the getting is good. Their days are numbered.

Great point.

Is there a way to see how many shares are being traded at any point in time.

If there was, I would bet that shares are being traded in large numbers. As usual, the Mom and Pop investors will be the ones getting burnt.

The writing is on the wall and has been for some time.

P

You should be able to monitor the CEO's, board members and other high ranking employees and what they do with their shares. It's pretty easy to watch their sells/buys and determine what might be going on in the company. I figured this out before 2000 when I watched the tech stocks before Y2K, seeing if they thought things were going to go bad.

You will see on a lot of forums lately when registering you get asked, Are you

male
female
non-binary

and I'm like 01100111 01110100 01100110 01101111...

www.nasdaq.com...

Farcebook:
Number of Insider Trades

Last 3 mo.Last 12 mo.0200-400-200400
Last 12 mo.● Number of Buys: 197
3 Mo. 12 Mo.
# of Open Market Buys 20 197
# of Sells 44 292
Total Insider Trades 64 489

Number of Insider Shares Traded

Last 3 mo.Last 12 mo.0-100M-50M50M100M
3 Mo. 12 Mo.
# of Shares Bought 2,838,784 50,110,398
# of Shares Sold 3,793,941 55,795,348
Total Shares Traded 6,632,725 105,905,746
Net Activity (955,157) (5,684,950)

Twitter:

Number of Insider Trades

Last 3 mo.Last 12 mo.0-200-100100
3 Mo. 12 Mo.
# of Open Market Buys 1 18
# of Sells 47 167
Total Insider Trades 48 185

Number of Insider Shares Traded

Last 3 mo.Last 12 mo.0-30M-20M-10M10M
3 Mo. 12 Mo.
# of Shares Bought 295 2,058,201
# of Shares Sold 4,378,038 19,326,035
Total Shares Traded 4,378,333 21,384,236
Net Activity (4,377,743) (17,267,834)

Man are Wamans.

Can I has 280 chrs now?

Cutting off yer pecker don’t make you a woman. It makes you a dude that cut his pecker off.

a reply to: MrPopularity

Silencing the opposition has become a huge problem regarding trans issues:

Academics are being harassed over their research into transgender issues

Barbara Kay: Absolutist dogma is chilling transgender research

We're all being gaslighted on a major level. Its not just hateful conservative "cis" people who are having problems with the Trans Activism. There are very serious concerns and issues in many corners.

Well I'm on a 30 day Facebook ban for saying that a large portion of Trumpers are white trash. So... it goes both ways.

There are four lights.

it's very simple, if people can be made to disagree that something as immutable as someone born a man is a man, then you may force them to concede to all manner of falsehood.

Men ARE NOT women.

You can hack it off, turn an outie to an inie

But the DNA is male = man, which means NOT WOMAN.

No two ways around it.

This is certainly what they want isn't it?

a reply to: ketsuko

1984 is their wet dream.

a reply to: Boadicea

And the gas lighting will continue until it hits sudden death, and that would be a problem for everyone.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Well I'm on a 30 day Facebook ban for saying that a large portion of Trumpers are white trash. So... it goes both ways.

If what you're saying is true, what or who provoked your anti white Trumpers response on, of all places, facemock?

a reply to: MrPopularity

After giving this subject a lot of thought, I find that indeed a man could be a woman, IF he could give birth.

But of course, he would have to be a Muslim; and then all his kids would be little Shiites.