Give up your guns now

Who voted for this idiot!! Wait, I know........

..,and the anti gunners go full retard.
Serious question.,. Are any of you this friggin stupid ?

But I guess if you are, you really wouldn't know huh?

a reply to: DAVID64
Imagine those who voted for him just cheering, yaaa nuke em all!!!! Nuke us allll!!!!

Unreal. Just come right out and tell the world you are going to violate the entire Bill of Rights for roughly one third of this country.

Unbefreakinbelievable.

And they say Trump should watch his words??? I don't recall Trump threatening to kill millions of Americans for exercising their Constitutional rights.

its actually good for them to talk like this. It wakes people up to the fact that these mutts will never stop. It does not matter if they have power or not.

Μολών λαβέ

a reply to: Golantrevize


I am glad that guy is not the President. Maybe we should call for Arms Control for our government.

a reply to: DAVID64

These are the same party that said that Guam would tip over and wanted the Mars Rover to drive by the American flag.

originally posted by: agenda51
A very wise man once said...

m.youtube.com...

Swallwel is a gutless soy boy new world order baby eating satanic demon commie.

You forgot to add that the hopes and dreams of the left are heavily invested in this guy.
It is like a bad movie with the DNC.


[Movie anouncer voice.]

From the people who brought you Hilary Clinton for President.
If that didn't scare you enough,
we have a bold new tale of Democratic Rep. Swalwell.
A man who does not mince words.
He will kill you.
All of you.

Coming soon to an election, near you.


Or something like that.

a reply to: Golantrevize

Superior military technology worked out so well in
..Vietnam and pretty much every middle eastern conflict in the last 20 years.

Guerrilla warfare is tough, if the us ever saw such a conflict, it would make all the prior conflicts pale in comparison.

Unfortunately for the globalists, there is just too many real Americans, and not enough north American globalist inhabitants in the us to make this a walk in the park.

The last bastion of freedom will really be the hardest nut to crack and any attempt to crack it may just cause the world to spiral down into a position that eradicates hundreds of years of technological progress.

I'm excited, to be honest.

a reply to: Golantrevize


The context was the motive of the second ammendment was that the people could protect themselves from a government gone rogue. Swalwells point was that in this day that is ludicras in that (using nukes symbolically) the weapons available to the government so out weigh the paltry weapons available to citizens, that war would be a total miss-match



Joe Biggs
✔
@Rambobiggs
· 7h

So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your #ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell
✔
@RepSwalwell

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

And Rep. Swalwell reveals how crazy he is.

Yes, the government has nukes, but if the government's aim is control of the country, then they would not nuke it. Then, they win nothing but radioactive ashes.

Rep. Swalwell is the biggest moron of all.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Golantrevize


The context was the motive of the second ammendment was that the people could protect themselves from a government gone rogue. Swalwells point was that in this day that is ludicras in that (using nukes symbolically) the weapons available to the government so out weigh the paltry weapons available to citizens, that war would be a total miss-match



Joe Biggs
✔
@Rambobiggs
· 7h

So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your #ing mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell
✔
@RepSwalwell

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.

Didn't we have nukes during the Korean conflict? Why were they not used?
Didn't we have nukes during the Vietnam War? Why were they not used?
Didn't we have nukes during the Iraq War? Why were they not used?
Don't we have nukes now during the Afghanistan War? Why are they not used?

His argument is a non-starter and hyperbole. It shows his complete misunderstanding and lack of knowledge of the proper use of weapons. Just like his lack of knowledge of firearms....In plain words, he's a moron.

a reply to: ketsuko

I say launch the nukes, hit the top 10 city centers. Those of us smart enough to not be in some dense urban #hole will be fine.

.Gov nukes major cities thinking an easy cleanup will gain control. Then the Chinese make landfall and the Russians. 3rd word sleeper cells get fired up, world stock market collapse, western Europe goes middle east overnight, while rural America barely bats an eye.

Got to wonder why any of these 3 star fools are even being paid for their "consultation".

The world will burn, and all that will survive is rural areas. That in mind the only country with good rural, but modern, areas that survive will hold staunch American values. Values such as freedom and independence.

WaPo? Don't expect anything less than division!


Video here
Orange Goblin "Rage of Angels" -Song to Death Wish 3, "Duel" and Mad Max (warning)

The good news for the alt left is, most Americans will gladly give up their guns.....when they're empty.

We all intend to give up our bullets first.

This is what happens when you give democrats power.

I am guessing no one has explained the math to him exactly. The world has roughly 45.5 million active duty and paramilitary forces. There are in the neighborhood of 120 million private gun owners owning upwards of 340 million firearms in the US. At least half of those world’s soldiers are from countries that don’t particularly like the US and might not give mutual aid to the US Government.

Nukes? Many of them are kept on bases where a lot of those gun owners live. So other than submarine arms, a very real risk of those bases being taken by the very people you want to nuke exists.

Somebody just needs to beat the holy crap out of him repeatedly until he figures it out. I’m not volunteering because I know there are people far better at it than I am.

originally posted by: Nickn3
I have no guns, lost them all in a freak boating accident. If I did , I would say come and get them sucker. If you didn’t know I am a firm believer in the US Constitution, including the 2nd amendment.

What? You too? I'm still trying to find mine.

“The government has nukes.Too many of them. But they’re legit,” the congressman tweeted. “I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.”

At least they're not bigly.

Kind of sounds like a threat, too bad tweets are so easily taken out of context.

-The government has nukes. check
-Too many of them. Okay sure
-They're legit......... Err.. I would hope so. Enough tax payer money has gone into them.

And yes, we the common people should talk, and you, the other politicians and those who sit in a seat of authority and power should listen.