Ted Olson - Barbara Olson - Lady Booth

Ok Ted is back in the news because he is helping CNN sue Trump.
He is Deep State for sure, remember him pushing the narrative via his wife's death on 9/11.

Those of us following 9/11 always questioned those phone calls from the plane he said he got from his wife.

This is one 9/11 conspiracy I have not seen before.
Now some are theorizing how his new wife which looks a lot like Barbara Olson "might" be her but with surgery .



ATS what do you think ?

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Love the premise but I’m not buying this one. Ears are totally different and I’m not sure how surgery could change her entire mouth area that much. Plus Evelyn has some weird thing going on with her eyes that doesn’t look present in Barbara’s at all. Again, not sure how surgery could change that either way.

I suppose if he has a certain taste in women then it’s not unlikely his wives look alike.

a reply to: faint1993

Very similar both born in 1955 too.

Where did Lady Booth go to law school?
Why did an attractive, educated lady not marry until 45?
Why did she appear as if out of nowhere, and conveniently meet Ted?
Where is her photo in a high school, college, and law school year book?
Why is there so little information about her available?

Inquiring minds want to know.

That’s obviously a totally different person....

Pretty disgusting though to claim a guy lied about his final words with his wife because it doesn’t fit with your ignorant views of what happened....then drag it up again years later because he doesn’t say nice things about your favourite politician.

Sometimes I wonder if you people realise that people like Ted Olson are real and not some bad guy in a bond movie.

Honestly suggesting that his new wife his actually his dead wife.....

You can believe BS like that but not that 19 guys just hijacked a few planes and flew them into buildings.

One thing that has endlessly fascinated me my whole life is how so many people have so many doppelgangers (which is probably all this is, TBH). I have always been pretty good at remembering faces and as a young kid I used to acquire enemies from mistaking one kid from the next because so many people look the same.

Somewhat OT but it's kind of like how George was dating the girl who looked just like Jerry. LOL

This phenomenon is even more common than I realized before I got the internet. I see so many people who look alike and even some have very similar voices and speech mannerisms. Sometimes I even get suspicious that some youtubers (different people) are the same person but it turns out that they're not. It's interesting how nature can often make almost exact copies of people who are not closely related (obviously, if you go back far enough you could likely find common ancestors but still).

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33

ATS what do you think ?

Even with millions of dollars of surgery that is still a different person.

Different eye shape, different eyebrow shape. Different nose shape and different mouth. The smiles are different. One also seems to have slightly protruding upper jaw. Ears look different in shape and the lobes don't match - one is straight, the other hanging.

Where the hair is split and color of the skin are also different, but those are not as important. Color may be due to lighting or equipment, hair can change.

I wonder if the OP just saw the movie “face-off” and thought what if.....?

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

We come here to discuss conspiracy theories, even the bizarre ones that are really out there.
That's what ATS is all about, trying to shut down discussion of a conspiracy goes contrary to what ATS is all about.

But obviously Ted has his type that he really likes.

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

We come here to discuss conspiracy theories, even the bizarre ones that are really out there.
That's what ATS is all about, trying to shut down discussion of a conspiracy goes contrary to what ATS is all about.

But obviously Ted has his type that he really likes.

The idea of "deny ignorance" isn't a goal that ATS hopes to accomplish. Instead, it's a challenge. A call to all those who come here to aspire to a higher state of awareness through informed discussion and debate. Deny ignorance is what we do.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Wasn’t the phone calls also attested to by phone operators, the secretary, and a person in the room? Like how conspiracists grasp at straws while ignoring things like DNA evidence, personal effects recovered, jet wreckage, with no other plausible explanation for what was witnessed. Well, other than it’s all a lie, they all lied, and you don’t know what magic technology the government practices.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

so , do you really think that :

mr & mrs olson - faked mrs olsons death - then [ after surgery ] remarried

makes any kind of sense ????

hint - this is real life - not a scooby doo episode

She is probably a different person but I still don't trust Ted.

Olson’s Story Contradicted by the FBI

The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson’s story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

Back on 9/11, the FBI itself had interviewed Olson. A report of that interview indicates that Olson told the FBI agents that his wife had called him twice from Flight 77.10 And yet the FBI’s report on calls from Flight 77, presented in 2006, indicated that no such calls occurred.

This was an amazing development: The FBI is part of the Department of Justice, and yet its report undermined the well-publicized claim of the DOJ’s former solicitor general that he had received two calls from his wife on 9/11.

Why did the FBI suddenly go against part of the official narrative ?

That is the better question, if Ted wants to resurface and go against the current white house, he needs to be prepared to have this all dredged up, Ted you should have stayed in the shadows.

DP due to a slow ATS

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

What dragged up? That his wife was a victim of a horrific crime?

Start with the fact the cell phone calls could not have happened, at the altitudes, and for the times claimed. Knowing this, Olson’s calls were not real. Maybe Ted is this naive, but I doubt it.

Maybe he wanted her gone? The plastic surgery idea, is interesting in theory. But, the two women don’t look that similar to me. What about height? Dental records?

originally posted by: Jchristopher5
Start with the fact the cell phone calls could not have happened, at the altitudes, and for the times claimed. Knowing this, Olson’s calls were not real. Maybe Ted is this naive, but I doubt it.

Maybe he wanted her gone? The plastic surgery idea, is interesting in theory. But, the two women don’t look that similar to me. What about height? Dental records?

Can you cite what altitudes the calls were made from? Which call were from cell phones. Which calls were made impossible by altitude? Some? All? And which calls were made by the installed phone system on the jets?

Or do you just have the spoon fed innuendo of the truth movement without being able to state actual altitudes, which calls were made by cell phone, which calls made by the installed phone system, which calls were backed by phone operator accounts?

a reply to: Jchristopher5

Start with the fact the cell phone calls could not have happened, at the altitudes

People always say "cell" phones while totally ignoring the planes built in seat back phones.

a reply to: samkent

Not relevant as the FBI says the call was made but never connected, why would they contradict Ted ?

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: samkent

Not relevant as the FBI says the call was made but never connected, why would they contradict Ted ?

And here is a counter viewpoint that actually looked at as many facts as possible released to the public.

Can you quote the FBI in they started Barbara Never called her husband. Or you only have a classic example of the truth movement creating false claims by hiding the whole truth, using information out of context, and right out lies. There is a reason the truth movement killed its own credibility.

2009-12-22/fake-phone-calls-what-evidence-shows-1

911blogger.com...

911myths.com/images/9/95/265A-NY-280350-302-22170-Unredacted.pdf
she received a series of approximately six to eight collect telephone calls.
intelfiles.egoplex.com...
The trial was in 2006, and the evidence presented was simply the calls. The airphone calls were classified as "unknown" because they were collect calls and no record from the airphone recorded the number dialed as the operator, ....not the person using the airphone, dialed the number. They could have gone ahead and presented the evidence to show who made these "unknown" number calls, as they already found out in 2004 as the documents show, but there was no reason to do that because Ted Olson wasn't on trial, and it would be irrelevant to the case and a waste of the courts time. Anyway, that's my guess.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

'19 guys just hijacked a few planes and flew them into buildings'

Hmmm, strange that you use that example when it's already been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the majority of those '19 guys' could not possibly have been aboard the planes that hit the towers.........only arguing that one point and nothing more.

Not sure why people still use this description of 911 when it's just not valid