It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash
So really there is a lot of overlapping and integration going on in the sciences.
True. But it wasn't a change in climate that put the shell fossils on the mountains.
The event that put the shell in the mountains led to such drastic geological upheaval that it represents seemingly cataclysmic climate changes in the past.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash
The event that put the shell in the mountains led to such drastic geological upheaval that it represents seemingly cataclysmic climate changes in the past.
No.
It took a long time. A very, very, very long time.
We were just speaking hypothetically so in my example we are referring to possible megaquakes thrusting up a mountain range in under a few thousand years.
We have millions of people who do not have sufficient data, yet due to being bored humans will still comment on a subject they know nearly nothing about.
originally posted by: Wildbob77
I live about an hour from where the fires are in northern California. We have not had any rain since May. It is bone dry. My pastures have large cracks in them.
It is also unusually warm here. I'm still wearing shorts and T shirts. When the fire broke out, there were high winds gusting over 30 mph.
So it is not a normal weather pattern here this winter. Usually, we get our first rains in early October. I used to work in the tomato industry and the first rains would pretty much shut down the harvest so I am pretty aware of what the weather used to be like.
It is no longer the same. I'll let others decide what has caused the changed patterns of weather.
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
a reply to: Knapperdude
Totally agree — multifaceted problem. Moreover, totally agree it is highly likely to get worse.
Back in your day, did you ever reference yourself (or others ‘label’ you and your cohorts) as professionals in “silviculture”? I ask because I worked with the NCSU Extension Service in grad school and spent a summer with the “silviculture” team, but have yet to encounter that term since (don’t remember encountering it in the forestry college either). Thanks in advance!
originally posted by: Knapperdude
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
a reply to: Knapperdude
Totally agree — multifaceted problem. Moreover, totally agree it is highly likely to get worse.
Back in your day, did you ever reference yourself (or others ‘label’ you and your cohorts) as professionals in “silviculture”? I ask because I worked with the NCSU Extension Service in grad school and spent a summer with the “silviculture” team, but have yet to encounter that term since (don’t remember encountering it in the forestry college either). Thanks in advance!
Silviculture is the study of trees, so in part yes, there were individuals who majored in Silviculture that were also registered professional foresters, my degree included some courses, but there were those who specialized in that field...Tree doctors...Foresty was mainly involved with timber harvest and managment (thinning, planting, ect). "Cruising" is the estimation of standing timber and just a estimate, setting up plots of land, hiking and measuring live standing trees." Scaling " is done at the mill, and the actual board feet of logs, using math formulas to subtract beetle damage, lightning damage and fire damage from the usable wood for the mill.
The Silviculturist dealt with systemic issues, like bark beetle, fungus, ect. I worked with them from time to time...they are tree doctors...literally giving trees shots. like wildlife biologist they are tasked with massive areas of responsibilities... maybe 1 guy per 100,000 acres or even more. a waiting game to get a job like biologist, with degree in hand and a waiting list exceeding 5 to 10 years.