Does this "continued vote counting" in some states reek of voter fraud or what?!

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Greven

I prefer that over magically finding boxes of ballots that run 90% Democrat.

Congratulations.

You don't actually care whether votes are actually legitimate.

You only care about your side winning - thanks for the admission!

Here's a giant clue: overwhelmingly Democrat counties are going usually much more densely populated, which means more votes to count and more of those slower-counted votes are Democrats. Big shock, I know.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Greven

Generally I wait until someone breaks the law before I shout CRIME.

What law was broken on November 8th?

originally posted by: Greven


There is no evidence of electoral fraud. There is only whining. Grow the hell up.

Really?

No evidence?

In violation of court orders, already convictions of prior fraud, and you sit there claiming innocence?


You define insanity.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

It reeks of desperation by those who just can't accept what to them is unacceptable results

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Annee

No.

Not like that would ever happen either. Democrats have a lock on this.


Enjoy it, you're "party" gets to create the votes, gets to count the votes, gets to name the "winner". It appeases the masses into giving them the illusion that they get to participate in the voting process.

I know what side of the fence you are on.

If it was the GOP being accused, your "story" would be different.

No.

You're wrong again. Because the law is the law and I would abide by it regardless of the outcome.

I don't base the law on how it would benefit me.

Look, I'm conceding.

You and your "party" are the better cheaters. You and your party will gain power by hook or by crook. It doesn't matter.


Sometimes a person just has to accept the fact that the bad guys win, cheaters prosper, and the corrupt get to be in charge.


It's refreshing actually. Because the "rules" have changed, thanks to "your" party.


The rule of law doesn't really matter now. It's whomever is in charge is what matters.

About time you submitted to Mob Rule.
What took you so long?

I was naïve enough to think that the system actually worked.

That's on me.

My bad.

a reply to: Greven

LOL SMFH

Broward County

Largest Dem area in Florida

Every election the GOP finds something wrong.

a reply to: DBCowboy

This post reply gives you a sammy of your choice to go
along with the cookies.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven


There is no evidence of electoral fraud. There is only whining. Grow the hell up.

Really?

No evidence?

In violation of court orders, already convictions of prior fraud, and you sit there claiming innocence?


You define insanity.

Where's the evidence of electoral fraud, 'sane' one?

A link or two would be helpful, eh?

You make a claim, you provide support.

originally posted by: Annee
Broward County

Largest Dem area in Florida

Every election the GOP finds something wrong.

So...did the Broward election supervisor violate election laws?

Was the Judge wrong?

a reply to: Annee

They are,

Filling out blank ballots

Shipping in ballots in personal vehicles alone

defying a judge's order

Blockading the vote counting facility

refusing to let anyone watch the count

and more

and we're to blame?

You will love the New Boss

Noone can provide a plausible alternative motive outside of voting fraud for breaking the law and violating court orders? No one? One viable reason to continually give the law, judge, and inspectors the finger while you count?

Then it looks like we have evidence that might suggest voter fraud is occurring...

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: DBCowboy

This post reply gives you a sammy of your choice to go
along with the cookies.

Hehem!...I like sammiches too.

a reply to: Greven

What is your definition of "sane" evidence? What sources would you believe?

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: Greven

What is your definition of "sane" evidence? What sources would you believe?

You misread. DBCowboy said what I wrote was insanity. I asked him as the 'sane' one for evidence.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Annee

They are,

Filling out blank ballots

Shipping in ballots in personal vehicles alone

defying a judge's order

Blockading the vote counting facility

refusing to let anyone watch the count

and more

and we're to blame?

You will love the New Boss

I am aware that is what you choose to believe.

I'll wait for the facts.

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven


There is no evidence of electoral fraud. There is only whining. Grow the hell up.

Really?

No evidence?

In violation of court orders, already convictions of prior fraud, and you sit there claiming innocence?


You define insanity.

Where's the evidence of electoral fraud, 'sane' one?

A link or two would be helpful, eh?

You make a claim, you provide support.

How about all the PAST CONVICTIONS in Broward county by the same person NOW IN CHARGE AND IN VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS?

There was no blue wave.
The only logical explanation is voter fraud so let's "recount"

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greven


There is no evidence of electoral fraud. There is only whining. Grow the hell up.

Really?

No evidence?

In violation of court orders, already convictions of prior fraud, and you sit there claiming innocence?


You define insanity.

Where's the evidence of electoral fraud, 'sane' one?

A link or two would be helpful, eh?

You make a claim, you provide support.

How about all the PAST CONVICTIONS in Broward county by the same person NOW IN CHARGE AND IN VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS?

Again, evidence? Links? Prove some of this stuff you're claiming.

Is it that hard to paste a URL?

a reply to: Greven

You make a claim and you provide support! Again,we go back to what
sources would you consider valid?