Acting AG Could Appoint a Second Special Counsel to Investigate SpyGate

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: burntheships

But whose going to investigate the new Special Counsel's investigation, after that??

The United States Supreme Court !!

If it ever gets there 😆

originally posted by: UKTruth

a new SC should have the remit to investigate every aspect of Obama's, Comey's, Clinton's, Rice's, Holder's, Brennan's lives. Everything they have ever done to find out if they have ever broken the law. Everyone around them should also have their lives investigated.
That would be fair and equal application of a second SC.

Agreed, although I may not have stated it clearly.

But yes, fair is fair right? Game on.

Great idea, but if the Acting Attorney General appointed someone else, it might make Robert Mueller feel less special.

originally posted by: Majic
Great idea, but if the Acting Attorney General appointed someone else, it might make Robert Mueller feel less special.

We can call them the "participation counsel".

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
a reply to: burntheships

Whitaker is not qualified and is a criminal.

Anything at all, any facts or sources to present in favor of your opinion?

originally posted by: burntheships
I am pretty sure that the Dem's have a corner on those Russian nesting
dolls lol. Don't ya think?

I was hoping the joke wasn't too subtle it went unnoticed.

And eta, better and cheaper than a civil war eh?

I was sooooooo hoping for the civil war, I had my rifle all oiled and loaded too.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: burntheships
I am pretty sure that the Dem's have a corner on those Russian nesting
dolls lol. Don't ya think?

I was hoping the joke wasn't too subtle it went unnoticed.

And eta, better and cheaper than a civil war eh?

I was sooooooo hoping for the civil war, I had my rifle all oiled and loaded too.

I got my powder and musket balls are stacked and ready! It's only fair if we have civil war again that we use the instruments of the time right?

Trump is a counterpuncher the like of which the Leftist have never seen. The puny House investigations hold nothing compared to the Justice dept. if the Left really want to destroy themselves just start it. EVERYONE of them on both sides, well perhaps except for Mike Pence, have things to hide. Personally I’d like all of it to come out.

originally posted by: luthier

Hate to break it to you but FISA has been grossly abused since 911. It's the expansion that is the problem. You can't legislate restraint into the laws. If they are wide open they will be abused.

Can't think of a better way to reign it in than a big explosive
investigation that outrages a lot of Republicans who are in
control of The Senate, and might just legislate a fix or two?

You should read the list of fisa abused during the last two administrations.

All kinds of misdeeds, bulk collection, purposeful misleading judges....

Yet they expand and extend it all the time.

So your all for giving it an overhaul?

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
We can call them the "participation counsel".

We should just say every Counsel is Special.

And give them a trophy.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: burntheships

But whose going to investigate the new Special Counsel's investigation, after that??

Well we’ll have to appoint a special counsel for that.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: luthier

Hate to break it to you but FISA has been grossly abused since 911. It's the expansion that is the problem. You can't legislate restraint into the laws. If they are wide open they will be abused.

Can't think of a better way to reign it in than a big explosive
investigation that outrages a lot of Republicans who are in
control of The Senate, and might just legislate a fix or two?

You should read the list of fisa abused during the last two administrations.

All kinds of misdeeds, bulk collection, purposeful misleading judges....

Yet they expand and extend it all the time.

So your all for giving it an overhaul?

Um yeah.

Every post I make is that fisa is a huge problem because of the lack of restraint politicians have and will always stretch the law.

No need for an investigation its already well documented how much it is abused.

Problem is these Republicans you trust keep voting for extensions and expansions.

The reason I am.not calling out dems who are just is guilty is I hope to reach you to check out who voted to extend and expand surveillance laws..


I will say again I am far more concerned with the rights of average people than those in power. They have plenty of access to law.

We however nobody cares about.

All the NPC's just started blankly after Snowden dropped the evidence.

I can think of a better way to stop it. Vote out people voting to expand its powers. Whatever party they belong to

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: burntheships

But whose going to investigate the new Special Counsel's investigation, after that??

Maybe we will just have a procession of them indefinitely.
I honestly wonder at this point!

Maybe Trump will just use this as leverage, however the Dem's
DDT are just too predictable. Can't let them have the upper hand
we already know the playbook.

Besides, think of all of the great SJW marches this will spawn.

Hollywood will have a boom, maybe even Michelle O will
come out to play.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I got my powder and musket balls are stacked and ready! It's only fair if we have civil war again that we use the instruments of the time right?

Totally. So looking forward to a screaming bayonet charge.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I got my powder and musket balls are stacked and ready! It's only fair if we have civil war again that we use the instruments of the time right?

Totally. So looking forward to a screaming bayonet charge.

Those are my fave!

a reply to: burntheships

Well I am all for this, if the Democrats dare to start trying to impeach Trump.

It sounds like that is the plan based on the overheard call from the congressman yesterday.

If they want a war, I say Trump needs to give them one.

originally posted by: theantediluvian


No.

Okay, maybe not a hundred times, but 10 times worse than Watergate easily. If you buy the official version of Watergate especially.

Spygate is the biggest abuse of federal powers by far that we know of. Alleged and nameless Russian "sources" with ties to the Kremlin and Putin at a time we know that they want to cause chaos in our political processes. FISA abuse in numerous ways. In one instance on a patriot who just helped them convict Russian spies. Circular reporting/evidence. Leaks and leaky lies. Conspiracy. And so much more. Anyone who digs into the details with an open mind can see it with just what's already in the public domain.

Yeah, this will get really good if Trump and the DOJ pull the trigger. The DOJ could actually earn some respect back.

originally posted by: underwerks


Well we’ll have to appoint a special counsel for that.

Ah, but you noticed Jeff went out with thumbs up and hugs
to everyone. He didn't call a presser and demand a second
special counsel right?

Got to admire him for that at least?

Some unfounded chatter that Sessions is going to be named as a special counsel !!!!!

😬

originally posted by: proximo
a reply to: burntheships

Well I am all for this, if the Democrats dare to start trying to impeach Trump.

And we know they will, at least that is all they have talked
about for 2 years. Oh, wait....I forgot they also talk about
Russia alot too. But since than panned out to nothing .....