Filemaker admits to making alien autopsy film.

We all know it's a fake but is this guy taking credit for someone else or did he really make the film?

www.foxnews.com...

www.thesun.co.uk...

I mean if something like this did really happen I would think there would be no way that the cameraman that filmed it would still have the film in his possession. Something like this would be kept far away from public consumption if not long destroyed. I would like to think that a film like this does exist but who knows for sure the people that know aren't talking.

I remember that clip from that film when the camera scanned across the body and there between the aliens legs where one might suppose to find the aliens genitals the film was fuzzed out so that we could not see alien junk.

If that had been real I can only imagine that seeing alien junk would be interesting.

I had a feeling that footage would be faked. Gov/Militarily never release any footages to the public. I believe that should be clear by now lol.

Did we really need the confirmation on this one?

I remember the blurred junk too and thought it was odd. but then remembered all aliens have 3 boobs so I debunked that straight away.

At the very least if this was an actual body of a person with birth defects or just a corpse with crazy makeup, thank god they blurred it!

I've no reason to believe him and I also have no reason to say that footage is authentic. He could be telling the truth but he could've also be paid to come with his revelations.

originally posted by: Butterfinger
Did we really need the confirmation on this one?

I remember the blurred junk too and thought it was odd. but then remembered all aliens have 3 boobs so I debunked that straight away.

At the very least if this was an actual body of a person with birth defects or just a corpse with crazy makeup, thank god they blurred it!

Refurbished blow-up doll

Snooki edition

a reply to: skeeterslint

Spyros revealed he was given a £30,000 budget and set to work creating the set, props and “contamination suits”.

Question is who gave him the £30,000 , lot of money 20 years ago.

He found an old tramp living on the streets, offered him $500 and a night in a hotel and he agreed.
By pure chance the homeless man had been an actor many years ago. He cleaned him up, gave him a shave, added a bit of make-up and a false prosthetic nose and chin.

Until someone else admits to it he can make the claim but I'm not convinced.

a reply to: gortex

It would be interesting to find out who fronted the money to do it. Also I wonder how much they made off of it, probably not a small amount either.

originally posted by: skeeterslint
I mean if something like this did really happen I would think there would be no way that the cameraman that filmed it would still have the film in his possession.

I don't know. Somebody kept the ruby slippers from the Wizard of Oz. Seems like he would keep a piece of the dummy, if nothing else, as a collectible.

Over the years the body has been attributed to that of a deceased woman with a genetic condition which was used to clam that of an alien body. That alone had me wishing the body had been constructed by someone rather than someone's remains paraded as evidence as an alien as it may have appeared to some.

Dis-info to taint the claim? Perhaps that is it. I wish for true evidence as much as the next. However, there's a high chance it is fake similarly described in the OP despite I can't say I believe him to be the film maker. The claim begs of more information. Why wait so long to release this? have the original body or evidence? Why do it in the first place, to make money(that probably never showed)to muddy the water of research? He had no fame(as he calls himself the magician) in it. Maybe in some twisted way just the act of hoaxing itself.

Spyros was on TV tonight and he is a very poor liar - so he definitely didn't make the film. To add to his lack of cred he tried doing a simple magic trick and it went completely wrong; so that clinched the fact he's a conman.

Despite how the film looks to some people I know it has to be real due to the massive push to convince the public it's fake; even going so far as to make a comedy about it. I think Santilli and everyone else was threatened by the military to convince the world it was faked.

There are too many things that don't fly to make me believe it's a hoax. (1) It was apparently made in the 1980s or early 1990s when it would have been too difficult without any internet to ensure every prop and the film stock were authentic, plus to source them all - acquiring rare historic props is tough. (2) It would have taken months, or years, of pre-production work and research by an expert; but the men were just ordinary guys who claimed to have put this together without any effort. (3) It would have cost a BOMB to make the film; the props alone would have cost a huge amount and the dummy thousands. (4) It really isn't easy to make a prop dummy - anyone who's tried to make a prosthetic will know how hard it is and how much time, effort, skill and materials it takes. The alien dummy was a very top-class professional job for the 80s/90s they claim made by a total amateur, which I cannot believe at all - so therefore it has to be real, because no-one could have made it at that time without a big stack of money, big skills and a proper model-making studio, plus several assistants.

So little about the fake story about faking the film adds up.

What?

No way man.

That footage was so legit.

a reply to: skeeterslint

I'm sure somehow a real thing got out,you can tell by the half assed excuses,and these fools saying they made it,with no proof

Perhaps a quick check of the names produced would suffice.

"John Humphreys", the Sculptor.....said he made the Alien Model, back in 2006.

www.bbc.co.uk...

Though, he claims it was recreated off some Old footage??? Who Knows.

Some of his work.....

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
I remember that clip from that film when the camera scanned across the body and there between the aliens legs where one might suppose to find the aliens genitals the film was fuzzed out so that we could not see alien junk.

If that had been real I can only imagine that seeing alien junk would be interesting.

If they were another species and from space or another planet.....

What makes you think their genitalia would be in the same area as

us earthlings?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Must have been the version you watched as the original version had no censorship.


Either it was female or the hoaxer took the easy way out.

a reply to: gortex

The missing genitals and belly button were part of the hoax which was at the sub-genius level of Doty's ice-cream luvin' captive alien or those 'tall whites' who love Vegas gambling. Hoaxers love a twist and a hook to catch the smarter audience. "Whoa whoa whooooooaaaaaaaaaaa there. Hang on! Look, it's got no belly button. Who could possibly dream that up?! It must be real!!"

Hmmmm. No belly button means it wasn't birthed and, HOT DAMN, no genitals either. OMG! It must be a hybrid alien. Oh gosh, aren't there also stories about hybrids being created in Dulce vats? Awww man, does this mean the Holloman landing and Eisenhower Briefing document was for real? OMFG we did deals with hybrid alienzzzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!

a reply to: Kandinsky

No belly button means it wasn't birthed

But as you know mate Greys are a creation of the Reptilians so we should expect no genitals or belly button , +1 for the video.

a reply to: gortex

Sneaky buggers aren't they? Serpo, TTSA, captive aliens, dead aliens, gun camera footage (ahem), secret bases, hybrids and hoaxes that are so bad they must be true (Strieber and Howe). It never ends!

ETA - man, it was fun back then.

a reply to: Kandinsky

Can't believe you're suggesting the A51 footage is hoaxed too , you've shattered my reality !


Yeah , it was fun back then.