FBI Arrests Man in Connection to Pipe Bombs

a reply to: Subaeruginosa
I guess you will believe any bull# if it can be negatively blamed on Trump. Did you forget Obama created a propaganda agency when he signed off on the NDAA 2017 which has been funded every year since?? That it's mission is to use special operators and agents to influence targeted populations And create partnerships with private companies, NGO's, academic institutions, journalists and other professionals to further that mission.

It's All laid out there in the thread I have linked in my signature.
The global engagement center receives renewed funding the few years it has existed, and the news has become quackier ever since.

But that is just an unrelated coincidence and I am stupid to believe in conspiracies and I should just shut up and believe everything the church of news preaches as the Gospel.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo

originally posted by: Ansuzrune
a reply to: GeechQuestInfo
Hopefully you leftists and your everything goes policies never come to fruition. The Marxism you will usher in would serve you right but since many of us NATIONALISTS are not going to allow that to happen, It would be mugs up at the Green Dragon Tavern just before we hammer your #@% out of the country!!

Lay off of talk radio and perverse blogs. Nobody is a Marxist in this country, nor is anybody wanting to usher in Marxism. I know you heard that somewhere, and you're an emotional wreck all in your feels, but there isn't nor will there ever be Marxism in the US. Nobody wants that.

No, that's right. When you guys talk about it, it's called "sharing" where someone comes to me, takes what I have earned by force and decides who deserves it more than I do.

You know, from each according to his means to each according to his needs.

It wasn't exactly a Marx original idea...
Acts 2:14-45
"Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day.

They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer. Everyone was filled with awe at the many wonders and signs performed by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need."

Acts 4:32-35
"All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need."

From a recent boss

'A model employee' despite views on minorities, former boss says
Gureghian, general manager of New River Pizza and Fresh Kitchen in Fort Lauderdale, said Sayoc was open with her about his views. He calls himself a white supremacist and dislikes gays, African-Americans, Jews and anybody who isn't white, she said.

Gureghian said Sayoc told her that lesbians like her and other minorities should be put on an island. And though he liked her, he told her she would burn in hell, she told CNN.

Even though she hated his political leanings, Gureghian said she didn't fire him because he did his job and there were no complaints.

"He was a model employee," she said, adding that she "can't understand" how he would allegedly send mail bombs.

Link

a reply to: Greven

The difference, dear, is that the believers did what they did voluntarily, of their own will and when countries do it, it's by force, not everyone signs on.

The first example is, indeed, sharing. The example so many of the deluded want is not sharing, but theft.

Let me try it this way:

When Christ would teach it - Example 1

Two children are eating their lunch at school. One notices the other has no sandwich, but he does. So, he breaks his sandwich in two and offers the kid without half his sandwich.

The is true charity and sharing.

When Government would teach it - Example 2

Two children are eating their lunch at school. The lunch teacher notices that one of them has no sandwich where the other does. So, she takes the sandwich from the kid who has it, breaks the sandwich in two, and gives one half to each kid without asking either if this is what they wanted.

That is government forced theft and redistribution being sold as "sharing" and "charity." That is what we end up with.

a reply to: Greven

Those acts were also voluntary, not forced by some government.

Are you advocating for a theocracy now?

TheRedneck

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
I guess you will believe any bull# if it can be negatively blamed on Trump. Did you forget Obama created a propaganda agency when he signed off on the NDAA 2017 which has been funded every year since?? That it's mission is to use special operators and agents to influence targeted populations And create partnerships with private companies, NGO's, academic institutions, journalists and other professionals to further that mission.

It's All laid out there in the thread I have linked in my signature.
The global engagement center receives renewed funding the few years it has existed, and the news has become quackier ever since.

But that is just an unrelated coincidence and I am stupid to believe in conspiracies and I should just shut up and believe everything the church of news preaches as the Gospel.

The NDAA 2017 was introduced in 2016 to a Republican-controlled Senate by Republican Senator John McCain and passed 92-7.

The NAY votes were mostly Democrats:
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Lee (R-UT)
Markey (D-MA)
Merkley (D-OR)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Wyden (D-OR)

Plus one not voting:
Cotton (R-AR)

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Greven

The difference, dear, is that the believers did what they did voluntarily, of their own will and when countries do it, it's by force, not everyone signs on.

The first example is, indeed, sharing. The example so many of the deluded want is not sharing, but theft.

I simply said it wasn't an original idea.

a reply to: Greven

Few ideas truly are, but to claim they are the same idea is disingenuous. You're smarter than that.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Greven

Few ideas truly are, but to claim they are the same idea is disingenuous. You're smarter than that.

I haven't read where Marx advocated force in such a redistribution, but I'm not communist / socialist, either.

here are some nice examples of previous nefarious activities...keep in mind Oswald please, while reading.
www.infowars.com...

(26) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(21) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

8) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this). The U.S. Army does not believe this is an isolated incident. For example, the U.S. Army’s School of Advanced Military Studies said of Mossad (Israel’s intelligence service): “Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”

(9) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Greven

Few ideas truly are, but to claim they are the same idea is disingenuous. You're smarter than that.

I haven't read where Marx advocated force in such a redistribution, but I'm not communist / socialist, either.

Because when the property is not yours and yet you produce it, it has to be taken and given out by someone, some authority.

In human society, who or what ends up being that authority?

In a society of 350 million, how do you produce in common and distribute fairly without a central authority? The answer is that you can't. So those who make have it taken to give to others. Nothing you have in such a society is ever truly yours in any real way.

You could work hard all summer to produce a crop through your very own labor only to have it all taken and see none returned to you.

This happened in Ukraine under the USSR's rule. Ukrainians in one of the richest farming regions out there died by the thousands, more, because it was taken as soon as they produced and none was given back. They were starved.

well at this point they only have like 5, right?
[/quote

Actually, I think thats the cumulative IQ of Foxnews viewers.

Quality, not quantity.

a reply to: odzeandennz

Well...kudos to you.

You pretty much nailed it with that list. Not necissarily in order, but pretty damn spot on.

Bravo.

a reply to: neo96

Why didn't they send one to Pelosi. She's most hated by us hateful republicans.

He probably ran out of stamps.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Again, for all of the delusional and disingenuous morons still somehow claiming that it's the left that is violent, and not the right, feel free to read through this and realize just how absurdly stupid that claim truly is:

ascienceenthusiast.com... tm_source=socialnetwork&fbclid=IwAR3YEAcPdl8-uIBIZW3CwXtMGE9IEfLVm1n4nbGPLuHKGtf6aWDbGy_SpIM

a reply to: Maroboduus

And here you go, concrete statistics. Left leaning domestic terrorist incidents? 11. Right wing domestic terrorist incidents? 37.
More than 3 times as many violent attacks by right wingers than left wingers.
In other words, the people still making that amazingly stupid claim are either incredibly uninformed, incredibly disingenuous, or just blatantly lying worthless POS. Come on, dbc_cowboy or whatever the hell your name is. Come make another absurdly dumb argument trying to explain this away.

www.theatlas.com...

originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: Maroboduus

And here you go, concrete statistics. Left leaning domestic terrorist incidents? 11. Right wing domestic terrorist incidents? 37.

Let's hope it doesn't turn into a contest as to who is "winning" that as well.

The Encyclopædia Britannica says that Machiavelli “founded the science of politics for the modern world.” “Machiavellianism” is now a word meaning the political principle “that any means however lawless or unscrupulous” may be used by a ruler to maintain his power.

Such politics has plagued this 20th century. Wars, coups, corruption, horrible violence and terrorism are all manifestations of it. Politics is one of the most divisive influences of mankind.

Many people have become disillusioned by politics and politicians, and do not even bother to vote. Why is it that often, in spite of high-sounding ideals and humanitarian manifestos, politics has been so divisive and destructive of human life?

To answer this question we must go back in history over 1,950 years to a mountain in Palestine. There an unusual conversation took place that is the key to understanding the question of human rulership. Jesus Christ was about to begin his public ministry. Satan, God’s archrival for universal rulership, took the opportunity to test Jesus in an effort to break his integrity. The account tells us that Satan “showed [Jesus] all the kingdoms of the world [in a vision] and their glory, and he said to him: ‘All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.’”​—Matthew 4:8, 9.

To mankind’s everlasting blessing, Jesus rejected the offer. But what does this vital encounter tell us about Satan and the world system, “all the kingdoms of the world”? That Satan is the invisible “ruler of this world.” (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11) Thus the apostle John could write: “We know that we are children of God and that all the rest of the world around us is under Satan’s power and control.”​—1 John 5:19, The Living Bible.

Therefore it is Satan’s perverse spirit that permeates the world’s political system. He is the true source of the principles that Machiavelli compiled. Some may find it hard to accept that there is an evil, invisible spiritual power motivating the political rulers of the world. Yet this is a keystone to understanding the overall picture that the Bible presents of a clash over universal sovereignty. (Revelation 12:7-9) Satan has used politics to divide mankind and divert man’s attention away from the true hope for restored righteous rulership, namely, God’s Kingdom government by Christ.​—Matthew 4:23; 9:35.

Divide and conquer is one of his main tactics for manipulating the minds of men. The Bible also tells us that Satan transforms himself into an angel of light in order to try to deceive people, i.e. playing 'the good guy'.