It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: underwerks
Why would the right even try this ?
Trump has been winning.
The blue wave all but evaporated.
Supreme court, and lower court nominations.
Solid economic numbers.
Comments by Holder,Clinton, and Jacksnip Obama.
This miraculous appeared?
Doesn't pass the smell test.
originally posted by: Agree2Disagree
Can't we just call it what it most likely is? A right wing nutter...nutters exist on both sides and it's not surprising given the political climate.
I mean, according to the data, almost two thirds of domestic terrorism within the US is from right-wing extremist nutjobs...
A2D
originally posted by: shooterbrody
www.sandiegouniontribune.com...
San Diego Union-Tribune staff, others evacuate after suspicious package spotted
crazy day out there
originally posted by: oloufo
a reply to: headorheart
is there anybody 'normal' out there? do anyone besides me realize that ats is flooded by far-right-propaganda right now? it's always the same: it was the left, its false flag, the right never would do something like that etc... these people are dangerous (and lost), but it seems most of ats-members aren't willing to realize.
originally posted by: Tempter
originally posted by: narrator
I posted this in the other thread, but it's relevant here too:
If the script were flipped, most on this site would be calling for the bomber's head. Now, most of this site is saying "well, they didn't blow up so it's no big deal. It's the dems sending them anyway".
Folks, someone sent BOMBS to private citizen's houses! We need to drop the collective liberal/conservative hissy fit and find common ground, fast. It's clear that it's tearing this country apart.
We have no info on the bomber at this point. Making guesses doesn't do anyone any good. Let's wait for facts.
And for the love of all that is good, be nice. What I'm reading in here is ridiculous.
An aside: I fully expect everyone in here postulating on who it is to retract their statements if/when they're proven wrong. If it is someone on the right, everyone saying that it can't be needs to man/woman up and say they were wrong. Same for the left, if it turns out it is some crazed left wing person, y'all need to own up and say it.
The lesson: wait for the facts! It doesn't do anyone any good to throw out random guesses and instigate more arguing. We're better than this. Deny Ignorance. Some in this thread are doing the opposite of that.
Trump supporters don't condone violence, that's the Left's DAILY MANTRA.
Look at the list, will ya:
- Obama
- Hillary
- DWS
- Holder
- CNN
- Brennan
And they were all delivered and the media reported on them ALL within an hour or two of each other.
THIS IS A FALSE FLAG. No questions about it.
originally posted by: Kryties
originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Kryties
Desperate humans do stupid things. I think we can all agree with that.
Just one question... Why do you think "Trump supporters" are desperate?
I never said anything about "desperation". You did.
Why are you trying to manufacture a comment I never made?
Q. How large can an envelope be and still be eligible for First-Class Mail letter rates?
A. The maximum size is 11-1/2 inches x 6-1/8 inches x 1/4 inch thick. Determining the processing category of a mailpiece (letter, flat, or parcel) is dependent solely on the physical dimensions of the piece without regard to address placement. If an envelope exceeds any of the physical dimensions, or 3.5 ounces in weight, it is classified and priced as a large envelope (flat).
Q. Are items sent at First-Class Mail flats rates (large envelopes) required to be flexible and “uniformly thick”?
A. Yes. Large envelopes as well as padded mailing bags must be somewhat flexible (not rigid) and uniformly thick. Items mailed in large envelopes cannot have more than a 1/4 inch variance in thickness. Also, mailpieces must be rectangular with a maximum thickness (at the thickest point) of 3/4 inch. A mailpiece that exceeds any one of the maximum physical dimensions (15 inches x 12 inches x 3/4 inch thick) is classified and priced as a package (parcel).
originally posted by: toysforadults
Taurus full moon. This one is going to be in the news for a while.
Look for synchronicities in this event that may indicicate a ritual aspect
They're nobody. If this was a right winger doing this, they wouldn't have targeted irrelevant people,
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: MrRCflying
It will be interesting to see where this leads. A far right nutter, or a far left nutter trying to gain sympathy for the left. Either way, violence is not the answer.
I fear however, that something like this, someday soon, could be the opening shots of a new civil war. I pray that I am wrong.
I believe in a third option, how about an anarchist nutter? I have in many of my posts about the left during their protests that have turned violent is to identify that the groups doing the violence is not typically left protesters as much as ANTIFA and fringe anarchist, and we could easily have the same situation here as people want to point to the right in all this...
The other side of this is there was zero chance that these makeshift bombs would ever get to their intended targets, so I would need to put this down as the main purpose would be not to blow anything up as much as cause further rift between parties and we can pick dozens of bad actors for that roll.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: underwerks
Why would the right even try this ?
Trump has been winning.
The blue wave all but evaporated.
Supreme court, and lower court nominations.
Solid economic numbers.
Comments by Holder,Clinton, and Jacksnip Obama.
This miraculous appeared?
Doesn't pass the smell test.
originally posted by: narrator
originally posted by: Tempter
originally posted by: narrator
I posted this in the other thread, but it's relevant here too:
If the script were flipped, most on this site would be calling for the bomber's head. Now, most of this site is saying "well, they didn't blow up so it's no big deal. It's the dems sending them anyway".
Folks, someone sent BOMBS to private citizen's houses! We need to drop the collective liberal/conservative hissy fit and find common ground, fast. It's clear that it's tearing this country apart.
We have no info on the bomber at this point. Making guesses doesn't do anyone any good. Let's wait for facts.
And for the love of all that is good, be nice. What I'm reading in here is ridiculous.
An aside: I fully expect everyone in here postulating on who it is to retract their statements if/when they're proven wrong. If it is someone on the right, everyone saying that it can't be needs to man/woman up and say they were wrong. Same for the left, if it turns out it is some crazed left wing person, y'all need to own up and say it.
The lesson: wait for the facts! It doesn't do anyone any good to throw out random guesses and instigate more arguing. We're better than this. Deny Ignorance. Some in this thread are doing the opposite of that.
Trump supporters don't condone violence, that's the Left's DAILY MANTRA.
Look at the list, will ya:
- Obama
- Hillary
- DWS
- Holder
- CNN
- Brennan
And they were all delivered and the media reported on them ALL within an hour or two of each other.
THIS IS A FALSE FLAG. No questions about it.
I'm not saying whether it is or isn't. If it's proven that it isn't, I expect you to retract this statement. And none of that "well we can't believe the facts, so it's still a false flag" dancing around. If you're wrong, own up to it. That's all I'm asking, to be accountable.
originally posted by: queenofswords
The "potentially explosive" device was sent to John Brennan at CNN. CNN itself was not the target although they are milking that for all it's worth.