How a one world goverment COULD actually work.

originally posted by: Plotus
You talking the whole world ? Sounded like it. So Ethiopia and Bangladesh and Guatemala and all the impoverished places would do What ?

Who's going to raise them out of poverty in this Utopia. Utopia is an oxymoron you know.

In a perfect world ??? maybe your plan would work ...... let a natural disaster occur ......
There's a reason some places are uninhabitable and should not be populated.
Or maybe your thinking of the Georgia Guide stones.

One day there Will be a one world Government ...
And righteousness will prevail.

When did I say the the word Utopia?

Some #holes will always remain #holes. But with such a devolved government it would be up to those #holes to sort their own mess out.

S&F, at least your trying to improve the world, when so many are not.



www.youtube.com...

Hope for a better future.

a reply to: Unruhestifter
The most workable world government would actually be a federalised autocracy.
A network of local autocratic rulers all accepting the authority of one central autocrat.
See the description in Revelation ch17 vv12-13.

a reply to: Unruhestifter

What happens when a district goes over 5 million people?

originally posted by: Unruhestifter

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Unruhestifter

So your government gets to determine rights?

Last time I checked your government is doing right now.

Thats kinda the point of a constitution......to safeguards rights.

The Constitution is to limit government infringing on rights.

We are all born with rights, the government, your government, would want to define and determine them.

We should be moving towards less centralisation, not more.
There is no purpose for a world govt other than for an ever decreasing number of people to gain control of the world.

Cultures around the world are different. Stop trying to make them the same. It has never and will never work.

a reply to: Unruhestifter

We already have our militias they’re called the national guard. They can be federalized on a whim.

To me that means we don’t have a militia .

Citizens right to bear arms is the only way to guarantee a free society .

Maybe some back and forth brainstorming sessions would iron out the kinks in a global government.

a reply to: BenignChaos

We're too tribal.

Some nations have religious rulers and live in a theocracy.


You'd have to forcibly over-take their government and imprison their populations.

Other nations like socialism.


Some have monarchies.


Others have Constitutions.


Some nations don't let women drive. Some nations don't allow citizens guns.



Communism has been tried and has failed over and over again because "people".

a reply to: DBCowboy

A disaster that threatens all of humanity would be a good unifying force. Or the gradual implementation of a global constitution over a period of time would lessen the shock of change. We can do it as a species. Look at how interconnected the world already is today.

originally posted by: BenignChaos
a reply to: DBCowboy

A disaster that threatens all of humanity would be a good unifying force. Or the gradual implementation of a global constitution over a period of time would lessen the shock of change. We can do it as a species. Look at how interconnected the world already is today.

Nope.

The only way you'll ever have a one-world government is through force and the removal of individual freedoms, liberties, and ideologies.

a reply to: DBCowboy

If everyone thought as you do, maybe. You cannot say for certain they would reject a proposal that would save their lives or make them better. If the profits are good, the majority would join.

a reply to: BenignChaos

So if I disagree, then it'd be okay to take away my individual rights and liberties?

a reply to: DBCowboy

No. You would be shown where you are incorrect before being released. Why lead with violence when you can lead with compassion and care?

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Unruhestifter

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Unruhestifter

So your government gets to determine rights?

Last time I checked your government is doing right now.

Thats kinda the point of a constitution......to safeguards rights.

The Constitution is to limit government infringing on rights.

We are all born with rights, the government, your government, would want to define and determine them.

What rights are you born with? There are no innate rights. If you are born in the USA, you are born into a society that allows for certain things. If by the whim of nature you are born somewhere else, then subsequently you are born into the rights that specific society provides. Gimme a break. This whole divine rights hooey is just that. Kinda the same way that divine rights to certain land masses are also a load of it. In a time before societies existed then perhaps you had all the freedom you wanted. But the average lifespan was around 25-30 years old then, so not quite the bastion of paradise.

originally posted by: BenignChaos
a reply to: DBCowboy

No. You would be shown where you are incorrect before being released. Why lead with violence when you can lead with compassion and care?

Gods, that is ####ing scary ass stuff right there.

Thanks for proving my point.

a reply to: DBCowboy

How is that scary? You fear what you do not understand. You live in a world where people are locked away for victimless crimes, disappeared for having a differing opinion, or just murdered in the streets. You prefer the current model over one where you would still be given your freedom?

You honestly believe that the society you live in today is better than one where people are unified as one? It is sad how much people abhor unity in favor of what they have now.

a reply to: BenignChaos

If to gain unity by losing individuality, then puddin' you'll have to kill me before I ever think about joining your utopia.

Why would " One world government" need a military? I guess maybe in case a region went rouge? Anyway, we can't even get everyone on the same page here in the states, good luck with that........

a reply to: DBCowboy

Why would a unified world be the end of individuality? There is no reason for it. A benign government wouldn't take away individuality.

The fear of a single governing body is unfounded, has your individuality been stripped from you by your current government?