Did YouTube go down to erase a livestream of an object hitting the moon?

So not one person here has speculated that THE VIDEO THAT SHUT DOWN YOUTUBE COULD HAVE BEEN WHAT SHUT DOWN SUNSPOT?

A solar observatory that can photograph the sun can photograph the Moon just as well. Maybe they filmed what they saw and it took them this long to leak it?

There are many websites a video could be sent to for hosting.

Send it to several before public release to prevent one shut down from stopping it.

This guy is getting WAAAY to much attention for nothing. 15 mins and he's gone. Bets?

A fake alien invasion would have to have some serious props to simulate alien beings and machines.

As well would need sacrifices, False Flag attacks on humans (maybe 911 type) events.

I mean, think about it, IF 911 wasn’t the government the only other explanation would be aliens since we know damn well it wasn’t these terrorists of al-Qaida.

Indeed, the proof that 911 wasn’t these simple-minded terrorists is the way some kind of technology obliterated the buildings 1, 2, and 7...Oh, and of course building 5, some of the Pentagon.

a reply to: Sublimecraft>>> ,I didn't notice any Youtube downtime although I heard others talking about it. What I have noticed is that political ads have started big time. All pro democrat and anti republican and they're aimed at my local districts. Yeah.... good way to push a candidate is to have ads for them slow down your viewing when you hate ads already.

a reply to: Willtell

It is similar.
During the 1938 replay of the HG Wells classic the music program was interrupted with news broadcasts.

seriously? youtube goes down for a update and everyone flips out?

a reply to: humanoidlord

This virtual thread has been going on since September, there are many supporting threads.

Thousands of amateur astronomers out there,check any astronomer forum you find.not a single word on something hitting the moon.....

a reply to: Sublimecraft

Full o' poop. IMO. Too many people watch the moon. I think there'd be more than one video, and way too many reports. Besides, wouldn't the original up-loader still have the data to re-upload? Or, wouldn't it have been downloaded, due to the nature of the supposed event? I know I'd download that, snip-snap.

originally posted by: Spader
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The moon is probably the most observed object on or off the earth at any given time. I dont think the PTB have the juice to shut the whole worlds mouth up.

If they did I would sell my soul to them if they could do something about my wife.

And yet not one decent picture of anything including lunar landing sites has ever been seen.

Funny stuff..

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: Spader
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The moon is probably the most observed object on or off the earth at any given time. I dont think the PTB have the juice to shut the whole worlds mouth up.

If they did I would sell my soul to them if they could do something about my wife.

And yet not one decent picture of anything including lunar landing sites has ever been seen.

Funny stuff..

There are plenty of decent photographs of the lunar landing sites taken by several countries. No-one appointed you the arbiter of quality standards.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Prove it.

(I mean the "no one" part)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Prove it.

(I mean the "no one" part)

Fair point. As soon as I see a certificate appointing him as official arbiter of quality standards, ideally correctly spelt, not hand-written, in one colour, not a mixture of capitals and lower case and with the minimum of exclamation marks I will happily withdraw my hitherto baseless accusation.

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Prove it.

(I mean the "no one" part)

Fair point. As soon as I see a certificate appointing him as official arbiter of quality standards, ideally correctly spelt, not hand-written, in one colour, not a mixture of capitals and lower case and with the minimum of exclamation marks I will happily withdraw my hitherto baseless accusation.

Don’t forget the semen sample in triplicate.

So we have a highly focused camera from earth onto a celestial object, and one might not think that it was something earthbound that went in front of that camera..........at a highly focused level?

Like a bug........

Or anything else?

No offense but i see the same squigglies in my eye a times.......

IS that not plausible

a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Yeah. But things do hit the Moon from time to time.
phys.org...

originally posted by: ParasuvO

originally posted by: Spader
a reply to: Sublimecraft

The moon is probably the most observed object on or off the earth at any given time. I dont think the PTB have the juice to shut the whole worlds mouth up.

If they did I would sell my soul to them if they could do something about my wife.

And yet not one decent picture of anything including lunar landing sites has ever been seen.

Funny stuff..

You wouldn't know what a good image was even if it ran up and kicked you in the Gnads

a reply to: vinifalou

That would make it more suspicious than saying the whole of YouTube had a fault.

Just a guess

a reply to: spiritualarchitect


Really do you think it has the same equipment

The Moon is the most watched object in the night sky HUNDREDS of people would have seen an event like that.