Parallel Multiverse

On the hunt for the Higgs at CERN it came out as being exactly in the middle of supersymmetry and multiverse predictions.

My question now is why nobody is considering that both is true?

There could be multiple parallel universes. A more complex symmetry than just two, 3-4 parallel multiverses. I bet if we approach the topic from there we just have to solve for x to figure out how many symmetrical multiverses there are to make the Boson fit.
Not?

Most of this went over my head, I have to admit.

But it was cool dream fuel so thanks for that.

-Alee

a reply to: NerdGoddess

Are you sure you answered the right OP? Funny that you say "dreams", that's where I got the idea from.

In the television series the Flash they addressed this.

The multiverse is infinite.

a reply to: neo96

Not necessarily true just because you saw it in a show...

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: NerdGoddess

Are you sure you answered the right OP? Funny that you say "dreams", that's where I got the idea from.

Yes, I know about protons and neutrons and electrons but once you get past that to the higgs and the other... things, I just don't really understand them that well yet. I think I need to go back to school lol!

But seeing words like multiverse and parallel multiverse really gets me thinking.

-Alee

a reply to: NerdGoddess

Well then: mission accomplished. One person is thinking parallel to me.

It's all well and good hypothetically, but if there are multiverses and parallel realities, then why do I only perceive the one I'm in right now? What makes it so special?

a reply to: Blue Shift

The version of you is born in this one. The others are seperate even though they're technically you but in an anti-you, meta-you, cis-you,... kind of way.
Maybe if you die here you split up and parts of you merge with your parallel symmetrical yous?

originally posted by: Peeple
Maybe if you die here you split up and parts of you merge with your parallel symmetrical yous?

Ugh. I can barely stand to be around this version of myself.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Haha, maybe a sign other yous have already died and miss the other ways you were? The possibilities are endless.

a reply to: Blue Shift

It's funny, I just finished season 3 of Man in the high castle (very good show btw) and this show deals with the parallel multiverse theme, one of the characters 'Abe' says something along the lines of, we can only exist as ourselves in one of them at a time, so we can only enter another reality where we don't exist anymore.

I have never thought/heard that before and I find it quite interesting tbh. I mean I have no explanation as to why that would be but its the only reason I have ever heard that somewhat relates to your question, which i have thought about before myself.

a reply to: valiant

That is an odd show, I started watching that series and also watched it almost to the end of the 3rd season. An alternative reality in the 60s where the Nazis and Japanese won WWII each ruling over sections of the former USA with a neutral zone between with the Nazis having the majority.

Beyond the 6th and 11th dimensions theoretically every possible outcome, or starting point for the world all exist simultaneously. Your consciousness bound to your existence in this current reality makes the possibility of parallel universes seem unlikely. The past cannot be changed, the present is a result of that past, the future unknown.

Fascinating topic nonetheless.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Blue Shift

The version of you is born in this one. The others are seperate even though they're technically you but in an anti-you, meta-you, cis-you,... kind of way.
Maybe if you die here you split up and parts of you merge with your parallel symmetrical yous?

What if we all got our own "parallel reality"?

We all percieve the world differently, with close friends and family having a similar but not totally same perception of what our reality is and how it works, while people on the other side of the world, sees it quite differently.

How you percieve things, maybe closer to my perception, in "my world", but totally different in yours, and vice versa.

I have had this idea for some years, based on nothing but thought and dreams, but why not?

originally posted by: IAMNOTYOU
What if we all got our own "parallel reality"?

We definitely have our own individual realities which begin when we are born and end when we die. Nobody else has ever experienced reality seeing from behind my own two eyeballs. There seems to be some overlap with the universes of other living things, but that might all be an illusion, also. But it's a strong and persistent illusion, if so. Until I die, that is.

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: IAMNOTYOU
What if we all got our own "parallel reality"?

We definitely have our own individual realities which begin when we are born and end when we die. Nobody else has ever experienced reality seeing from behind my own two eyeballs. There seems to be some overlap with the universes of other living things, but that might all be an illusion, also. But it's a strong and persistent illusion, if so. Until I die, that is.

Yes exactly
So what if what scientist calls multiverses or parallel universes, are just other peoples perception of reality?

a reply to: Peeple

The multiverse thing is metaphysical speculation by a couple string physicists. Imho it is a cop out argument to explain away why our universe is special aka fine-tuning.

www.prospectmagazine.co.uk...

I learned in Dragon Ball Z that if you go back in time you go to a different Universe. I learned you can't change the past of your Universe. I found that out almost 2 decades ago from Trunks before it was mainstream.

So I do think you can learn a lot from shows.

a reply to: Peeple


Shouldn't this be in Gray area and not Science? Come on Mods where are you?

Perhaps the reason people Schiz out over quantum physics is they don't have an intuitive model?

I find the explanations that start with basics like "entropy" to be easier to understand since they don't defy any laws of causality. As one goes "forward" in time, the second law of thermodynamics says, the entropy of an isolated system can increase, but not decrease.

The arrow of time is a unidirectional part of the space-time continuum, as verified subjectively by the observation that we can remember the past, but not the future. In this regard time is very different from the spatial dimensions, because one can obviously move back and forth spatially. However, there is a contradiction between the empirical observation that time is irreversible, and the time-reversibility of physical laws. Most laws in physics are expressed in a time-reversible manner, meaning that they can be applied in either temporal direction.

The ceiling of the Sistine chapel is a good example the entropy increased dramatically from AD 1508 to 1512.


arxiv.org...


Of course ever since Maxwells demon scientists have tried.

phys.org...