Jon Titter Arrested

This is kind of funny and also a little strange. I couldn't remember how to spell John Titor's name so I did a search for Jon Tittor and saw an article from a few days ago about a guy called Jon Tittor being arrested for breaking into schools at night and stealing stuff. Apparently he also had a record for "use of a minor in nudity-oriented material" so they weren't very happy about this and "will seek a high bond to keep Titter behind bars".

CLEVELAND - The man out on bond after pleading guilty to several charges of burglary and theft for breaking into schools was arrested by Marshals on Friday on new charges.

Jon Titter, 38, was wanted for stealing cell phones and laptops from a boys locker room at Willoughby South High School Tuesday evening, according to U.S. Marshal Pete Elliott.

He was also wanted for stealing items, including yearbooks, from Hawken School.

fox8.com...

There's also articles from a few months ago when he was previously arrested for breaking into schools, this article has a picture of the guy. It's pretty funny that he looks like the sort of guy who might be a soldier. This Tittor is 38 so he would have been around 20 years old back in 2000 when Titor popped up. Most likely has nothing to do with it but I still thought it was amusing.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

How does he "look like a guy who might be a soldier"?

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: ChaoticOrder

How does he "look like a guy who might be a soldier"?

I guess it's mainly the beard, can easily picture the guy in some military fatigues. Obviously I'm not trying to suggest he's an upstanding guy, I just think it's funny he looks not far off how I imagine the time traveling Jon Titor would look like.

It will be interesting to see if my post is deleted for drift. I say this because this thread seems to be a thread about total randomness. A poster who could not recall how to spell a name he was searching for. A name that was randomly ''close'' to the name searched for. A man who appears guilty of random crime. A man who looks just like other people yet according to the OP ''looks'' somewhat like OP's imagination of a time traveler. And then for some random sparks of neural firing, gets posted on a conspiracy website yet offers not conspiracy to ponder.

So I guess I am free to talk about my leaf covered lawn without it being considered drift.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

I guess it's mainly the beard

isn't facial hair banned in most Western military's?


maybe in recent times, very recent times its changed but beards are a no no in the military as far as I am aware.


Just looked quickly, In the past before Reagan the Navy allowed its sailors to have beards but that changed.

There are petitions by military to get officials to allow facial hair but not sure if its allowed yet.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Yes it is just a random thread about something random I found which I thought was funny. Considered posting in the off-topic section but it does relate to John Titor so I just put it in the general conspiracy forum. I didn't "offer" a conspiracy because I knew it would sound dumb. Although I think it's fairly obvious what I was hinting at by checking how old he was in 2000.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

It's more a veteran look then.


Wrong name, beard reminds of soldier, you're the only one who thinks it's funny... @OP fail. It happens to the best and everybody else.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I suppose that my real question is the nature of randomness. Should we relegate our own random thoughts to fit in with the random thoughts of others or is there some larger, existential set or sets of randomness that can be approached all the while being loyal to the original posted randomness. Do I need to speculate on specific randomness parameters established by OP or in some manner is it that all randomness is partner to all other randomness. Is it possible to take a specific example of randomness and extrapolate from that into a general randomness? Let's as our mods.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Ok so they are "seeking to violate the Constitutional Rights" of this guy because of their "Feelings" ???

What happened to: "“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”" ???

I guess the Constitution doesn't matter anymore anyways right?
Let's keep him in jail because WE FEEL LIKE HE DESERVES IT???

Tyranny, it's Tyranny I say!

And actually, just what do we suppose that linear background could be behind that photo that looks suspiciously like my old high school friend Billy Boils.

a reply to: muzzleflash

Yes this bail is out of order. Oh wait a second. It is stated that

Apparently he also had a record for "use of a minor in nudity-oriented material" so they weren't very happy about this and "will seek a high bond to keep Titter behind bars".

Is this reference to child porn. And as the wording is ''use of a minor'' in nudity oriented material, would this not mean that he has a record of not just looking at child porn but rather taking pictures of nude children himself? Do we consider that a possible pedo is being handled excessively when so many here on ATS generally call for castration without trial for this type of sickness?

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: muzzleflash

Yes this bail is out of order. Oh wait a second. It is stated that

Apparently he also had a record for "use of a minor in nudity-oriented material" so they weren't very happy about this and "will seek a high bond to keep Titter behind bars".

Is this reference to child porn. And as the wording is ''use of a minor'' in nudity oriented material, would this not mean that he has a record of not just looking at child porn but rather taking pictures of nude children himself? Do we consider that a possible pedo is being handled excessively when so many here on ATS generally call for castration without trial for this type of sickness?

The Constitution doesn't say "No Excessive bail UNLESS...", it says "No Excessive Bail".
There is no exception, he's entitled to be treated fairly like everyone else.

This is how tyranny happens and the Constitution erodes - people have "feelings" and those "feelings" override the law of the land.

Look, if everyone hates Constitutional rights so much than maybe we should just burn the damn thing and get it over with. I'm just tired of all the hypocrisy, people claim they support it but at the same time demand all these things that violate the hell out of it.

a reply to: muzzleflash

I'm just amazed you found a conspiracy in this.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I would say that wording refers to something like taking pictures of kids on a beach or something else that doesn't involve real nudity but is "oriented" that way and is still considered to be wrong. I cannot really say whether he deserves to rot in jail because I don't really know enough about what he actually did or why he did it.

a reply to: muzzleflash

These latest actions came while he was out of jail on a 2500 dollar bail. The new crimes he is charged with seem to be very much like the charges he faced that he already got a reasonable bail for. He is also a registered sex offender. And all these theft charges come from thefts of institutions that are child oriented. Schools.

So to me, it appears that this ''excessive bail'' is not just due to the ''feelings'' of authorities but rather the unlawful pattern of crimes he is accused of.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

AS it may be. However the article you offered has as it's Headline

Marshals arrest convicted sex offender accused of breaking into schools

So, a regestered sex offender is arrested because he was breaking into a bank? An office? A gas station? No, schools.
Schools for children.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I never said his bail is excessive, I don't know what it is yet. The News5 article from back in June states "Titter is being held at Shaker Heights Jail in lieu of a $750,000 bond" due to breaking into schools at night-time. That to me does seem excessive even considering his record, however that bond came down to $2,500 if we're to believe this Fox8 article published a few days ago. It seems like he got caught breaking into schools again while out on bail.

Obviously the conspiracy I was hinting at was that this guy is the John Titor from our time line where he was able to grow up without experiencing a war, and the time traveling Titor altered his name slightly to prevent anyone tracking down his younger self from our time line. However the men in black uncovered his real identity and tracked him down and want him locked away in case he knows anything. John Titor did state that his younger self was alive in this time line when he visited in 2000.

However the ages don't line up, Titor would have been much younger than 20 back in the year 2000, because he claimed to have come from the year 2036 and said he joined a militia as a 13-year-old in 2011, meaning he would have been around 2 years old in 2000. Obviously it's dumb which is why I didn't spell it out, but I did investigate the possibility since they were making very vague claims as to what crimes this guy actually committed and trying to get huge bonds.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

a reply to: TerryMcGuire


"Excessive bond" is defined as any bond you cannot reasonably afford.
So if I have 20 $ total in all assets, than a bond of 25$ is excessive - because I could never pay it and I'd be trapped in jail the entire time hopelessly.

Read this link on Excessive bail for a decent overview

So if they think he is a "danger to the public" and can show proof of that, than the procedure is to Deny Bail entirely on the grounds that if released, he would harm people.

Otherwise, Bail must be set at something attainable by the defendant.
In the case of the guy with 20$, the Court would be obligated to release him on his own recognizance (zero dollars) with whatever legally applied restrictions that will ensure his appearance in court to face trial.