It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mr Hilliam has been striving for 50 years to prove Spaniards or Portuguese sailed to New Zealand long before Maori.
Why say it was a dead link then say its funny I fixed it.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: schuyler
I believe it was organics in the bottom of some of the statues carbon dated. Pretty common in archaeology to dig underneath the focus and date that material for your dates.
originally posted by: bloodymarvelous
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: schuyler
I believe it was organics in the bottom of some of the statues carbon dated. Pretty common in archaeology to dig underneath the focus and date that material for your dates.
I'm guessing they must have been at least partially buried when they were first erected, or else they would tip over.
So yeah. That's pretty good. They can't really be older than the dirt under their feet.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Hanslune
Rano Raraku.
Does that translate to "Old Baldy?"
Sorry, just looking for a bit of relief from some other stuff on ATS.
originally posted by: ThatDidHappen
a reply to: Phage
Has anyone studied the erosion pattern of the moai? For example, the stones at Tiwanaku have on their surface patches of slow-growing lichen.
If there was a global entity that existed and there was cooperation between the different stone builder civilizations it would correlate with Moai being Egyptian in origin
The carbon dating has never sit right with me because of the vague merthod the mainstream archeologist would employ to arrive at a specific range of dates.