Sex Crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell COMPLETELY EXONERATES Judge Kavanaugh in new report

**NOTE - Title changed to fit **

BREA KING: Sex Crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell COMPLETELY EXONERATES Judge Kavanaugh in NEW REPORT!

After a careful review of all of the evidence put fourth by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has released a report which completely exonerates the judge.

Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, a non-partisan third-party with more than 25 years’ experience prosecuting sex crimes in the state of Arizona, carefully reviewed the allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, including hours of testimony, and has released a report on the matter. In the report, Mitchell points out more than a dozen glaring inconsistencies in Dr. Ford’s account and paints the accusations as potentially fraudulent.

Mitchell’s points out several points, including:

click link for entire article...

Well she was thorough in her review of the situation. Frankly Ford and Democrats need to be investigated for this bs stunt.







Larger images for those who use the braille system.


The most damning part according to the report / article -

In perhaps her most damning finding, Rachel Mitchell writes that “The activities of congressional Democrats and Dr. Ford’s attorney’s likely affected her account”. Mitchell ostensibly alleges that the maneuvering of congressional Democrats, and the actions of her attorneys, who acted more like handlers, influenced her account of events, and perhaps even her truthfulness. This may have come out as Mitchell’s lines of questioning were repeatedly interrupted by her attorneys, namely Michael Bromwich, who also represents Andrew McCabe.

Touching on the Yale accuser. During his background investigations over the years it was disclosed the FBI did speak to people who were at Yale with him. The 2nd accusers claims could not be corroborated either. Nothing popped at Yale from the previous FBI background investigations relating to Kavanaugh.

Now, as for Ford and her situation / testimony and influence by Democrats. That is actually a crime to tamper with a victim / witness. Even though state charges wont apply Federal charges for the same thing can occur because she was a sworn witness in an official congressional hearing. The other possibility that was raised is she was manipulated by Democrats. During her testimony she was asked several questions, like for instance if she knew the committee had offered to travel to California to interview her. She stated she was not aware of that offer. If she is telling the truth it is possible she was walled off from society to ensure Democrats could control the narrative. I dont think Democrats thought this would go as far as it did and were caught unprepared, again blowing up in their faces.

She needs to undergo a mental health examination to see if she was manipulated.

Secondly the 5 gofundme pages need to be investigated to determine who donated. This looks like a way to pay off people who come forward to make false allegations. Her house is worth about 3.2 million dollars and the 2 lawyers said they were representing her pro bono. She doesnt know who paid for the polygraph test either.

Grassley has already sent a criminal referral to the DOJ regarding the 3rd accuser regarding the boat in Rhode Island. That referral will ensnare Sen. Whitehouse who was caught trying to peddle the story to the media. When the reporter called him out one of his aides contacted the reporter to essentially beg him not to disclose the incident. He expressed concern it would look like Democrats were behind a coordinated effort.

The irony...

Now, the good news is Democrats have dug the hole so deep they are close to breaking thru into China. A country whose policies and government actions are more in line with Democrats plan.

Additional sources -
* - Fox News - Mitchell says she would not bring criminal charges against Kavanaugh in memo
* - CNN - Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
* - HuffPost - Senate GOP's Outside Counsel Says ‘Reasonable Prosector’ Would Not Bring Case Against Kavanaugh

ETA - 1 final note regarding statute of limitations in Maryland and the law in general
When a crime occurs the laws on the books at that time are whats required to be used. In this case the 2 laws on the books (36 years ago) at the time that would apply were misdemeanors and not felony. That means there was a 1 year statute of limitations for prosecution. There is absolutely no possibility to criminal charges. The police agency and prosecutor for the county in Maryland received a criminal investigation request from Democrats. They received a letter back declining, specifically citing statute of limitations.

In addition to crimes the statute of limitations at the time are whats used and not current law. In addition court sentencing / punishments are required to follow the law at the time. This is why some murder cases today that occurred decades ago are not eligible for the death penalty. At the time the homicide occurred is when the Supreme Court struck down all death penalty convictions.

a reply to: Xcathdra


I wish there was a way you could say in the title that this is the Prosecutor who questioned FORD and KAVANAUGH. I had no idea who this was before opening your thread.

This is great news! Dims will accept it, I'm sure!

Awesome news but I'm not gonna celebrate till he's officially sworn in, the Democrats have another 5 days or so to pull some BS

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


I wish there was a way you could say in the title that this is the Prosecutor who questioned FORD and KAVANAUGH. I had no idea who this was before opening your thread.

This is great news! Dims will accept it, I'm sure!

I doubt Dems will accept it. They demanded hearings and when they got them they demanded more time and accused Republicans of being bully's. When they got more time they demanded a full FBI investigation and got one. When they got the FBI investigation, within 24 hours, they started claiming it was a farce.

The Democrats dont seem to know when to quit when one of their schemes goes south. They keep doubling down with no clear path.

ETA - Thread title changed to add clarity as to what this thread is dealing with.

originally posted by: SPNoble
Awesome news but I'm not gonna celebrate till he's officially sworn in, the Democrats have another 5 days or so to pull some BS

Grassley sent a letter to FBI Director Wray saying he wants to know immediately if he or his agents conducting the supplemental investigation are contacted by anyone related to the case whose intent is to influence the investigation. He also wants to know immediately if they encounter any persons who tries to delay the investigation.

I dont think the Democrats are going to be able to influence this investigation like they thought they could.

a reply to: Xcathdra


Maybe you should put the title back the way it was. ATS is horrible with formatting title fields. Most people probably recognize the name Rachel Mitchell. It's just that I didn't.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


Maybe you should put the title back the way it was. ATS is horrible with formatting title fields. Most people probably recognize the name Rachel Mitchell. It's just that I didn't.

lol done.

All of these items were also mentioned in the real-time thread during the hearing. Imagine if Ms. Mitchel had been permitted to conduct a true, uninterrupted, line of inquiry.

a reply to: Xcathdra

"Larger images for those who use the braille system."

Thats age discrimination and I resent it.

Thank you, my eyes were starting to hurt.

a reply to: Xcathdra

I think the Dems aren't worried about truth, they are all about wagging the dog with the help of MSM, to carry this into the midterms...

It will be interesting to see how they try to EXTEND the 1 week FBI investigation...

originally posted by: loam
All of these items were also mentioned in the real-time thread during the hearing. Imagine if Ms. Mitchel had been permitted to conduct a true, uninterrupted, line of inquiry.

I believe the 2 lawyers were present to more run interference than to protect their client. During a part of the question Mitchell asked Ford about her letter to Feinstein. In her response Ford stated Feinstein told her she would release the letter just prior to the vote occurring. Mitchell caught the comment and began to ask her about it at which point her lawyers interrupted and were able to move off the slip onto something else.

originally posted by: PubertJohnston
a reply to: Xcathdra

"Larger images for those who use the braille system."

Thats age discrimination and I resent it.

Thank you, my eyes were starting to hurt.

Lol mine to.. Its why I added it

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Xcathdra

I think the Dems aren't worried about truth, they are all about wagging the dog with the help of MSM, to carry this into the midterms...

It will be interesting to see how they try to EXTEND the 1 week FBI investigation...

My guess is they wont accept any FBI results that dont go in their favor. I have also seen conversations regarding propositioned protestors who are supposedly going to go apepoop if this doesnt go their way. Huffpost already ran an oped saying Republicans need to drop this guy for the sake of peace and the country so the ground work for the media narrative is already being rolled out.

Democrats didnt get their way during the elections.
Democrats didnt get their way with the courts.
I think their final strategy is to destroy the country in hopes the people will elect them to fix it.


I honestly think we are seeing a new party emerging in the US via a split of the Democratic party.

The old guard Democrats and the new social democrats (aka fascists / nazis / communists).

a reply to: Xcathdra

Those Soros' backed protestors surely flipped FLAKE in an elevator...

I wasn't a fan of Kavanaugh being nominated... since he's a DC lifer...

This is a battle of Swamp vs Swamp IMO...

it kinda amusing to see the SWAMP eating their own

I would love to say this will matter, but it wont.

The Dems got exactly what they planned for

1. A Delay
2. An FBI investigation
3. A republican who can be turned

The issue is no longer ''did Kavanaugh do the crime'' but ''Will you allow sexual abuse to go unpunished''

Unfortunately for the DEMS, they set a dangerous precedent in a 2 fold situation

1. Trump Russia - we now know that investigations are allowed to look at everything AROUND the topic - So Kavanaughs accusers, Fords history, the Democrats links are all going to be looked at

2. Future Democratic nominations - You now only need an accusation with 0 evidence to grind the political system to a halt.

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Xcathdra

Those Soros' backed protestors surely flipped FLAKE in an elevator...

yep.. that did it.
As soon as I saw that, i knew it was a problem.
The girls in the lift looked scared
Flake was looking around for security
He couldn't leave
He was being filmed
the Girls were asking legitimate questions about sexual assault and rape - but framing it very dishonestly.

Soros, Clinton, Kamel, Comey, Mccabe, Strzok... they all watched that little piece of footage and laughed!

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Xcathdra

Those Soros' backed protestors surely flipped FLAKE in an elevator...

I wasn't a fan of Kavanaugh being nominated... since he's a DC lifer...

This is a battle of Swamp vs Swamp IMO...

it kinda amusing to see the SWAMP eating their own

Their is speculation Flakes encounter was a setup that he helped orchestrate. From what I have seen 2 democratic senators tried to call Wray to see how much time an FBI supplemental would take. They were unable to reach Wray but did get a hold of Rosenstein, who said it could be done within a week. Shortly after that call the 2 democrats talked with Flake, who then had is elevator moment and his change of position.

There is speculation Flake is either going to challenge Trump in the 2020 Republican primary or is going to team up with a Democrat to run as some kind of unity party option. Let's see how long it takes for Flake to get hired by CNN or MSNBC after he leaves office in January.

As for eating their own I completely agree. I think its sad our politicians dont realize just how idiotic they look with the way they act.

This HUGE news has hit FoxNews.com
www.foxnews.com...

CNN.com is still in full "stop Kavanaugh!" mode, however.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

The goal of Democrats is to derail the nomination and force it p[ast the midterms. Democrats think they will take enough seats to retake both houses and have already said that they will leave the seat open until 2020 where they expect to win the Presidency.

To Democrats its all about the power and control.

a reply to: Xcathdra

About this report, Democrats will say, "Poor Christine was traumatized so badly by beer-loving Kavanaugh, that her mind erased memory of the ordeal!"

Thankfully, the ONLY opinions that will matter are the few "on the fence" Republicans.