Another woman brings sexual allegation against Kavanaugh

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT


I find her flaccid accusation, limp.

This is just the tip.

I was at a spring break party in the Caribbean and there must have been 300+ naked people (it was spontaneous) who all "exposed themselves" to each other dancing on stage at a party. Do I have a case against all of them for "sexual assault"? I even have pictures and video of a lot of it, so my case should be air tight!

I wonder how many people would be disqualified from "society" if what they did as a freshman at college, or the first year out of high school - elsewhere, were held against them 35-50 years later.

originally posted by: DigginFoTroof
I was at a spring break party in the Caribbean and there must have been 300+ naked people (it was spontaneous) who all "exposed themselves" to each other dancing on stage at a party. Do I have a case against all of them for "sexual assault"? I even have pictures and video of a lot of it, so my case should be air tight!

I wonder how many people would be disqualified from "society" if what they did as a freshman at college, or the first year out of high school - elsewhere, were held against them 35-50 years later.

I'm just glad there were no cell phone cameras when I grew up. Film was too expensive to waste on penis...there was lots of penis flopping around.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

So know we know why they wanted to drag this out.....the democrats had an army of PI's out there trying to dig up dirt.

Correct. They are doing to Trump's nomination what the Republicans did to Obama's... running out the clock to the election. Choosing Kavanaugh was a huge mistake. The Democrats will have no problem smearing a white guy. If Trump wasn't such a racist misogynist, he would have realized that nominating a woman or a minority would have put the Democrats on the wrong foot. Oh well.

How about the right person for the job instead of race and gender?

originally posted by: JDmOKI

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist

So know we know why they wanted to drag this out.....the democrats had an army of PI's out there trying to dig up dirt.

Correct. They are doing to Trump's nomination what the Republicans did to Obama's... running out the clock to the election. Choosing Kavanaugh was a huge mistake. The Democrats will have no problem smearing a white guy. If Trump wasn't such a racist misogynist, he would have realized that nominating a woman or a minority would have put the Democrats on the wrong foot. Oh well.

How about the right person for the job instead of race and gender?

Oh, c'mon...THAT'S just Crazy Talk!

a reply to: JDmOKI

Sorry, off topic. But you have to wonder when the first sexual assault charge will be filled against a sex bot/sex bot company.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Isnt it time to just say NEXT... This guy is flawed. Time to move on. No one has anything invested in this guy and he's not the last possible candidate for the position.

The guy has had a highly respected career for decades. They have so little dirt they had to find people from the 80s to smear him.

If not him who? They'll do anything to stop a republican nomination.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I tried to make a joke about this all being a cock-blocker, but I couldn't find a word related to the process in question that was close enough to cock in sound to make it work.

I tried really hard though. I even pulled out my WIle E. Coyote Super Thesaurus and combed through.

originally posted by: JDmOKI

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Isnt it time to just say NEXT... This guy is flawed. Time to move on. No one has anything invested in this guy and he's not the last possible candidate for the position.

The guy has had a highly respected career for decades. They have so little dirt they had to find people from the 80s to smear him.

If not him who? They'll do anything to stop a republican nomination.

"By All Means Necessary"
- Chucky Schumer

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Good lord, I bet someone even inadvertently bumped up against someone else and scarred them for life too. If I was a therapist, it would only take me 6 or 7 days and enough money from the right political donors to get you to see it my way on that too.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Good lord, I bet someone even inadvertently bumped up against someone else and scarred them for life too. If I was a therapist, it would only take me 6 or 7 days and enough money from the right political donors to get you to see it my way on that too.

Big checks can usually take up to 6 days to clear.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Good lord, I bet someone even inadvertently bumped up against someone else and scarred them for life too. If I was a therapist, it would only take me 6 or 7 days and enough money from the right political donors to get you to see it my way on that too.

Speaking of six or seven days, the most damning hole in this story is the woman not being sure it was Kavanaugh until she sat with a democratic lawyer for 6 days.

In fact, she even admitted to some of the classmates she called she wasnt certain it was Kavanaugh.

5. Ramirez contacted her former classmates, asking about the incident, and admitted she was not sure that Kavanaugh was the male who exposed himself.

The Times' report states:

Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

www.dailywire.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Yea next time the Dems should win the election that way they don't need to make a circus out of the system. I'm kind of embarrassed.

Holding up the process, last minute accusations without evidence or wittnesses, made a mockery of the hearing just to delay, and senators grand standing and breaking rules, protesters etc.

What a joke

Heard someone on Fox News say this morning that these allegations don't have to be true only to be deemed "credible" by someone on the committee and at least one democrat on the committee has already said they are credible.

So, that means you really could destroy a person with a lie in this country.

Unbelievable?

There was a time when people were burned alive for being accused of witchcraft based on lies to which they were tortured into confessing to.

Maybe someday we will go back to something like that when all is said and done here?

I just watched Michelle Obama hug a man and her boobs pressed against his chest....he should go see a therapist.

originally posted by: ausername
Heard someone on Fox News say this morning that these allegations don't have to be true only to be deemed "credible" by someone on the committee and at least one democrat on the committee has already said they are credible.

So, that means you really could destroy a person with a lie in this country.

Unbelievable?

There was a time when people were burned alive for being accused of witchcraft based on lies to which they were tortured into confessing to.

Maybe someday we will go back to something like that when all is said and done here?

Theres a term for this....its been used for the last 2 years....its a witch hunt.

a reply to: JDmOKI

What do you think all the ridiculous accusations republicans have been doing have been?!?!

Benghazi, clinton rape allegations, Clinton email scandal, Clinton boddybag conspiracies, ellisons allegations now, James Gunn, al franken...


Republicans have been fabricating fake scandals that went nowhere for political clout for decades....


I can’t think of any fake sex scandal that predates the clintons..

a reply to: JDmOKI
It is sad that I have to start my post with this declaimer: I am not a lib and think brett would make a good judge.

The guy has had a highly respected career for decades

Irrelevant.

The women making the accusations have had respectable careers as well.

john wayne gacy was a nice man that sold ice cream to kids. Bernie madoff was very respected in his field. Can't judge a person by the job they do. We all have secrets.

I think you understand this.

After all you are not taking the careers of the women into account when you decided they were lying.

If careers mattered you would give the women the benefit of doubt.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Oh no.. that term predates two years ago by decades..


How many of this Benghazi commuters went anywhere??

What about Juanita broadrick who the friggin president brought to his own debate with is wife..


After being accused of rape by his ex wife in divorce filings..

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: JDmOKI
It is sad that I have to start my post with this declaimer: I am not a lib and think brett would make a good judge.

The guy has had a highly respected career for decades

Irrelevant.

The women making the accusations have had respectable careers as well.

john wayne gacy was a nice man that sold ice cream to kids. Bernie madoff was very respected in his field. Can't judge a person by the job they do. We all have secrets.

I think you understand this.

After all you are not taking the careers of the women into account when you decided they were lying.

If careers mattered you would give the women the benefit of doubt.

Great point.
...and let's not forget Stormy Daniels' stellar career choice.