It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: CynConcepts
When I do a search, what comes up mostly is overturned convictions, based on eyewitness testimony. But, they prove that it happens.
Murder Conviction, Based Solely on Eyewitness Testimony, Reversed after 25 Years www.forensicmag.com...
Why is "eye-witness" testimony enough to sentence someone to life in prison? www.reddit.com...
It happens.
My point is that testimony is considered evidence.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Because the cases that weren't overturned didn't make the news.
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Dude. There are people sitting in prison based on eyewitness testimony that are thinking "How can YOU be so stupid?"
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
So before they were great individuals when she thought they would back up her story.......and they would be credible
But because they deny it now you guys lambaste them?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
So it's your assertion that everyone is covering and lying for Kavanaugh because "bro's before ho's".
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
So it's your assertion that everyone is covering and lying for Kavanaugh because "bro's before ho's".
Yep. How do you get sixty women to sign a letter overnight?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
So before they were great individuals when she thought they would back up her story.......and they would be credible
But because they deny it now you guys lambaste them?
Your strawman shows your desperation. I never argued that the other witnesses would be credible any more than I said that Ford is credible. I have simply opined that Kavanaugh's willingness to accept a nomination from the most unpopular president in recent history on the eve of an election with the opposition party feeling angry after having their president's nomination being treated unfairly shows poor judgement.
This is not a trial, so the accusations are irrelevant. If it wasn't sexual misbehavior, it would be tax evasion, cruelty to animals, a covered up abortion... every golden statue has feet of clay.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
So it's your assertion that everyone is covering and lying for Kavanaugh because "bro's before ho's".
Yep. How do you get sixty women to sign a letter overnight?
Put the pen by the stove so they can see it.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Just stop. I never said hearsay evidence put anyone away. Get over yourself. Stop trying to move the goal posts.
Ford's testimony is evidence.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shawmanfromny
All four individuals deny any knowledge of "incident" and even knowledge of such a party.
So you believe four preppies never attended a single party as teenagers? Wow. They're his "bras." What did you think they would say?
So it's your assertion that everyone is covering and lying for Kavanaugh because "bro's before ho's".
Yep. How do you get sixty women to sign a letter overnight?
Put the pen by the stove so they can see it.
Exactly the attitude that has poisoned the GOP's chances in the next election.
"
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Just stop. I never said hearsay evidence put anyone away. Get over yourself. Stop trying to move the goal posts.
Ford's testimony is evidence.
Literally a page back man.........lol holy horse crap.........