TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: IAMTAT

Is he? Now THAT would be interesting to find out.

Richard BLUM.
He's on the Board of Regents.

a reply to: queenofswords

How does a psychologist not understand how polygraphs work?
That's an absurd claim, and all part of her act.

a reply to: queenofswords

Yes. I thought very interesting

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: queenofswords
There is a rat route leading up to the sabotage of Brett Kavanaugh's nomination.

This woman's portrayal of herself before the cameras at the hearing is NOT who this woman is, nor is her accusation what it appears to be, imo. Something else is up....and it stinks.

Isn't Di-Fi's husband connected to Palo Alto U?

Her husband's name is Richard C. Blum. Here is his Wiki page: en.wikipedia.org...

He is connected with the university system in CA, but a cursory read did not name PAU specifically. This little blurb jumped out at me though:

Blum's wife, Senator Dianne Feinstein, has received scrutiny due to her husband's government contracts and extensive business dealings with China

Dianne continues to use her 2nd husband's name. She's had 3 marriages.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

I enjoyed diving down that Payseur rabbit hole from your link Cranky.

I can't wait to tell my mother that St. Francis of Assisi was a Doge of Venice!

Remarkable how much connecting could not be done in the past, but now, all this madness (to an extent) can be lit up on a tweet thread. For those who missed the link. Paysuers and your enslavement


Separate Topic before I share a thought...

TAT, didn't you mentioned that Wictor was NOT a Q guy?

a reply to: All Seeing Eye

Very interesting if it's all accurate.
I think they actually started scrubbing stuff about her and her family before the story leaked though.

One terrible thing happened while reading through the article you linked.

A song spontaneously popped into my head and it will not leave so I will share it with y'all.

Only fair. I should not have to suffer alone.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: queenofswords

How does a psychologist not understand how polygraphs work?
That's an absurd claim, and all part of her act.

Exactly, BlueAjah....exactly! They must count on people being too stupid to see what's what!

originally posted by: doobydoll

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: doobydoll

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
a reply to: doobydoll

More to the point, why would the question be "is your statement false" rather than just ask her about the underlying facts of the event? LIke, "have you ever been in the same room as Kav?" or "Did Kav ever touch your on your b#?"

To me, that doesn't make any sense.

What if the statement they asked her about wasn't the statement we are seeing?

What if her statement was something like:
"My cat has whiskers".

"Is any part of your statement false?" No

"Did you make up any part of your statement?" No 

I'm no brief or legal expert or anything, but that written statement is so unnacceptable to base any sort of a case on. The most feeble 'evidence' ever. Shocking.

Exactly!

The entire story is feeble.

What gets me is that top-notch super-expert $millions per year lawyers have looked at that ridiculously vague statement and actually thought ''this is a very strong statement to build a case on''.

If it was any other case with such a vague statement with unverified changes made to it they wouldn't even use it to wipe their arse with never mind take it seriously.

They actually make themselves look fools. They should be embarrassed.

DD said "What gets me is that top-notch super-expert $millions per year lawyers have looked at that ridiculously vague statement and actually thought ''this is a very strong statement to build a case on''.

If it was any other case with such a vague statement with unverified changes made to it they wouldn't even use it to wipe their arse with never mind take it seriously."

They didn't, they removed anything that would be actual "evidence" and could lead to either perjury or real investigations. That statement is the result of detailed efforts to remove anything real. Everyone who says now "he's a rapist and can't coach girls basketball because he's a pedophile too" is simply taking a vague nothing burger statement and filling in a reality of their own choosing. Frankly, it/they were perfect on this.

But... it presumed they'd succeed and it would never be investigated. If DiFi is headed for the treason noose, this was expected but a terrible play, as it isn't the public that matters, only a couple of votes in the senate - but it is clear to me the legislative blackmail system has stopped.

originally posted by: doobydoll

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: doobydoll

originally posted by: Quadrivium

originally posted by: LanceCorvette
a reply to: doobydoll

More to the point, why would the question be "is your statement false" rather than just ask her about the underlying facts of the event? LIke, "have you ever been in the same room as Kav?" or "Did Kav ever touch your on your b#?"

To me, that doesn't make any sense.

What if the statement they asked her about wasn't the statement we are seeing?

What if her statement was something like:
"My cat has whiskers".

"Is any part of your statement false?" No

"Did you make up any part of your statement?" No 

I'm no brief or legal expert or anything, but that written statement is so unnacceptable to base any sort of a case on. The most feeble 'evidence' ever. Shocking.

Exactly!

The entire story is feeble.

What gets me is that top-notch super-expert $millions per year lawyers have looked at that ridiculously vague statement and actually thought ''this is a very strong statement to build a case on''.

If it was any other case with such a vague statement with unverified changes made to it they wouldn't even use it to wipe their arse with never mind take it seriously.

They actually make themselves look fools. They should be embarrassed.

GRRRRR.....
It never was about building a case. It was all about building doubt and stalling the confirmation process.
Soros probably broke the bank to pay for this "Pro Bono" hit job!

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

I enjoyed diving down that Payseur rabbit hole from your link Cranky.

I can't wait to tell my mother that St. Francis of Assisi was a Doge of Venice!

Remarkable how much connecting could not be done in the past, but now, all this madness (to an extent) can be lit up on a tweet thread. For those who missed the link. Paysuers and your enslavement


Separate Topic before I share a thought...

TAT, didn't you mentioned that Wictor was NOT a Q guy?

He probably is...but doesn't wish to be associated personally with Q.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky, it might be why they are scrubbing so hard now, after the hearing.
They were scrubbing as soon as before the story broke but now, after the hearing, it has gone overboard.

It is getting harder and harder to pull up stories, blogs, tweets, etc. that I just looked at couple of days ago.

So they said they wanted an investigation because they knew there would not be an investigation. It backfired and now they are trying to clean up before it gets too deep?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

I enjoyed diving down that Payseur rabbit hole from your link Cranky.

I can't wait to tell my mother that St. Francis of Assisi was a Doge of Venice!

Same here. Great link, Cranky. 👍

The whole Ford accusation thing is odd.

All these easily found gov connections.

The testimony that doesn't really accuse a crime so many years ago.

No location or exact date.

It just skirts actually accusing BK outright.


If the dems wanted to come up with an accusation that stopped his confirmation they could have come up with an intern or something, couldn't they?

I don't know what is driving this but it's just fishy.

Then add Avenatti to the mix.

Is this being dragged out on purpose? Strategic timing to keep this the news cycle?

Flake.

Judas goats...

a reply to: BlueAjah

She has also co-written several articles about the offspring of bi-polar parents:

(hmmm...maybe therein lies the relationship issues with her mother.)

[PDF] semanticscholar.org
Family environment of children and adolescents with bipolar parents
KD Chang, C Blasey, TA Ketter, H Steiner - Bipolar Disorders, 2001 - Wiley Online Library
Objectives: The effect of family environment on the development of bipolar disorder (BD) in
children is not known. We sought to characterize families with children at high risk for
developing BD in order to better understand the contributions of family environment to the …
Cited by 150 Related articles All 12 versions

Temperament characteristics of child and adolescent bipolar offspring
KD Chang, CM Blasey, TA Ketter, H Steiner - Journal of Affective Disorders, 2003 - Elsevier
Background: We wished to characterize temperament of children at high risk for bipolar
disorder (BD). Methods: We collected data from the Dimensions of Temperament-Revised
(DOTS-R) from 53 biological offspring of at least one parent with BD. Results: Overall, our …
Cited by 66 Related articles All 8 versions
[PDF] semanticscholar.org

[PDF] Divalproex monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar offspring with mood and behavioral disorders and at least mild affective symptoms
KD Chang, K Dienes, C Blasey… - Journal of Clinical …, 2003 - pdfs.semanticscholar.org
Background: Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder, by virtue of their high-risk status for
developing bipolar disorder, merit an investigation of the efficacy of treatment with mood
stabilizers. Behavioral and mood difficulties in this population may represent prodromal …
Cited by 90 Related articles All 7 versions
[PDF] academia.edu

Characterization of children of bipolar parents by parent report CBCL
KA Dienes, KD Chang, CM Blasey, NE Adleman… - Journal of Psychiatric …, 2002 - Elsevier
In past research the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) has differentiated among various
diagnostic categories for children and adolescents. However, research has not been
conducted on whether the CBCL differentiates among diagnostic categories for children at …


I found the list of papers she has written or co-written here:

scholar.google.com...


Again, imo, there is an ulterior motive for this accusation against Judge Kavanaugh, and she is using the current hysteria and hyperbolic atmosphere of the #MeToo movement to accomplish her (or somebody's) goals.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Wictor pretends he isn't a Q follower but he sure uses a lot of the info for his "theories".

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: BlueAjah

She has also co-written several articles about the offspring of bi-polar parents:

(hmmm...maybe therein lies the relationship issues with her mother.)

[PDF] semanticscholar.org
Family environment of children and adolescents with bipolar parents
KD Chang, C Blasey, TA Ketter, H Steiner - Bipolar Disorders, 2001 - Wiley Online Library
Objectives: The effect of family environment on the development of bipolar disorder (BD) in
children is not known. We sought to characterize families with children at high risk for
developing BD in order to better understand the contributions of family environment to the …
Cited by 150 Related articles All 12 versions

Temperament characteristics of child and adolescent bipolar offspring
KD Chang, CM Blasey, TA Ketter, H Steiner - Journal of Affective Disorders, 2003 - Elsevier
Background: We wished to characterize temperament of children at high risk for bipolar
disorder (BD). Methods: We collected data from the Dimensions of Temperament-Revised
(DOTS-R) from 53 biological offspring of at least one parent with BD. Results: Overall, our …
Cited by 66 Related articles All 8 versions
[PDF] semanticscholar.org

[PDF] Divalproex monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar offspring with mood and behavioral disorders and at least mild affective symptoms
KD Chang, K Dienes, C Blasey… - Journal of Clinical …, 2003 - pdfs.semanticscholar.org
Background: Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder, by virtue of their high-risk status for
developing bipolar disorder, merit an investigation of the efficacy of treatment with mood
stabilizers. Behavioral and mood difficulties in this population may represent prodromal …
Cited by 90 Related articles All 7 versions
[PDF] academia.edu

Characterization of children of bipolar parents by parent report CBCL
KA Dienes, KD Chang, CM Blasey, NE Adleman… - Journal of Psychiatric …, 2002 - Elsevier
In past research the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) has differentiated among various
diagnostic categories for children and adolescents. However, research has not been
conducted on whether the CBCL differentiates among diagnostic categories for children at …


I found the list of papers she has written or co-written here:

scholar.google.com...


Again, imo, there is an ulterior motive for this accusation against Judge Kavanaugh, and she is using the current hysteria and hyperbolic atmosphere of the #MeToo movement to accomplish her (or somebody's) goals.

So perhaps Ford is Bipolar, herself.
It may explain her difficult relationship with her parents.


I know from a family member that Bipolar disorder can result in people creating a false memory to the point it becomes absolutely true to them.

I'm just putting this out there because it keeps popping up in my mind today as I research this woman and wonder if anyone else has thought of him, too.........James Holmes.

originally posted by: queenofswords
I'm just putting this out there because it keeps popping up in my mind today as I research and wonder if anyone else has thought of him, too.........James Holmes.

James Holmes?
Can you explain more?

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Actually, I am trying to find collaborative evidence for something the CBSN media said yesterday when talking about Flake. Something about him having a meeting with Trump earlier. They were saying that is why he was conflicted and decided to vote yes with majority. This was when they were discussing him being trapped by protestors in elevator.

Aaugh! Does anyone know if Flake did indeed have a meeting with Trump? Is it possible that this is similar to how the Gnostics portray Judas. In that, he was needed to do what must be done to ensure the plan falls in place?

originally posted by: queenofswords
[snipped quote for highlight clarity]

I found the list of papers she has written or co-written here:

scholar.google.com...


Again, imo, there is an ulterior motive for this accusation against Judge Kavanaugh, and she is using the current hysteria and hyperbolic atmosphere of the #MeToo movement to accomplish her (or somebody's) goals.

I like this one:

Amygdalar activation associated with positive and negative facial expressions

Most theories of amygdalar function have underscored its role in fear. One broader theory suggests that neuronal activation of the amygdala in response to fear-related stimuli represents only a portion of its more widespread role in modulating an organism's vigilance level. To further explore this theory, the amygdalar response to happy, sad, angry, fearful, and neutral faces in 17 subjects was characterized using 3 T fMRI. Utilizing a random effects model and hypothesis-driven analytic strategy, it was observed that each of the four emotional faces was associated with reliable bilateral activation of the amygdala compared with neutral. These findings suggest a broader role for the amygdala in modulating the vigilance level during the perception of several negative and positive facial emotions.

💥😎💥