TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Or how about the time she compared American citizens to children who just need to follow the rules and "eat their carrots".

Her husband's administration, she told the audience, was like "having the 'good parent' at home — the responsible parent, the one who told you to eat your carrots and go to bed on time," The Hill reports. "And now we have the other parent," she continued. "We thought it'd feel fun — maybe it feels fun for now because we can eat candy all day and stay up late and not follow the rules."

www.dailywire.com...

It would be very challenging for Trump to face Michelle O. She is a black woman and any insult Trump throws at her will be spun as racist, mysogonist...etc..

She has said she's not running but...if Dems can't come up with a good candidate..she may step up.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
IIB !D!0T_GTFO #24,606

Fire RR not The Plan?
SG NF to teh SC!?
Are we Winning yet?
TRUST me!

Q has stated outright that the RR 25th amendment business is an attempt to bait Trump into firing Rosenstein, and that it is the FISA declassification which will lead directly to his removal.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
IIB !D!0T_GTFO #24,606

Fire RR not The Plan?
SG NF to teh SC!?
Are we Winning yet?
TRUST me!

I thought you were better than that.

You seem bored.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

No - that is reserved for Q. Are you Q?

1928
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
20 Aug 2018 - 12:02:47 AM

[Movie 1]
Showtime.
>>BO>>CS>>BO>>DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">NO>>CS>>DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">NO>>BO>>[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
Who instructed the DOJ to release 'select' text messages?
When did [RR] learn of involvement [BO][DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">DOJ">NO]?
What happens if [RR] knew PRIOR TO signing CP FISA?
Why did [RR] under congressional testimony refuse to answer the question re: reading of FISA prior to execution?
Who signed pg 380?
Who signed pg 389?
Who signed pg 390?
Who signed pg 391?
Who signed pg 392?
vault.fbi.gov...📁
Who is [1 of 4] FIREWALLS?
Who signed?
FIREWALLS?
Who signed?
FIREWALLS?
FISA [20]
The 'TRILOGY'.
MOVIE 1 [Full]: The 'START'
PLOT: How the intelligence apparatus, State Dept, and Dept of "JUSTICE" of the United States, in joint effort w/ our (x) primary foreign allies + other covert assets, as directed by HUSSEIN [WH] in coordination w/ HRC, colluded and conspired to RIG THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2016 in an effort to install HRC, frame POTUS (PROJECTION!), create emergency contingencies re: installation of SAFEGUARDS and FIREWALLS to PREVENT EXPOSURE OR CONTINUATION OF PRESIDENCY SHOULD COUNTER FAIL TO ENSURE OPERATORS, ACTORS, AGENTS OF POWER, PAST & PRESENT, REMAIN IN CONTROL, AND USE SOURCES/COVERT ASSETS OF THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA TO CARRY OUT X-FRAME BARRAGE OF STRATEGIC COORDINATED [GUIDED] ATTACKS DESIGNED TO DIVIDE, COVER/SHELTER, JUSTIFY IMPEACHMENT/REMOVAL IN EFFORT TO REGAIN CONTROL AND PREVENT PUBLIC AWARENESS OF ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL, TREASONOUS ACTS [MOVIES 1-3 FULL LIST].
Coming SOON to a theater near you.
MOVIE 2 – Coming this FALL.
MOVIE 3 – TBA
Enjoy the show.
Q

MOVIE 2 - Coming this FALL.

Saturday Sept-22 was the first day of fall this year.
Their were no drops on the 22nd

Why is FALL capitalized - SKYFALL?

Based on what "MOVIE 1" is depicting
MOVIE 2 is right on schedule

I don't think Trump should accept RR resignation.

RR and MSNBC are trying to spin narrative to he is resigning because he expects Trump to fire him. That was purpose of NYT article.

BS, don't accept his resignation under those circumstances and DON'T meet with him. He is weasel that does not rate that. The only acceptable resignation is full admission that he cannot faithfully carry out the duties of his position as they would self-incriminate him.

I want RR there until Schumer himself is begging Trump to fire him

originally posted by: Strate8
I don't think Trump should accept RR resignation.

RR and MSNBC are trying to spin narrative to he is resigning because he expects Trump to fire him. That was purpose of NYT article.

BS, don't accept his resignation under those circumstances and DON'T meet with him. He is weasel that does not rate that. The only acceptable resignation is full admission that he cannot faithfully carry out the duties of his position as they would self-incriminate him.

I want RR there until Schumer himself is begging Trump to fire him

Trump should not meet with any of the losers he fires. They are beneath him. They don't deserve that privilege.

While Brand has largely stayed out of the spotlight, public criticism of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein by President Donald Trump worried Brand that Rosenstein's job could be in danger.

Should Rosenstein be fired, Brand would be next in line to oversee Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russia's meddling in the 2016 election, thrusting her into a political spotlight that Brand told friends she did not want to enter.
www.nbcnews.com...

Did the IG recommend [RR] step down or be fired [speed]?
Why was Rachel Brand removed?
HUSSEIN + MO actively campaigning for the midterm elections?
Normal?
PANIC.
D5.
Q

Thursday morning (Trump: Rod, please have a seat. Rod: Thank You. Trump pulls out a can of Lysol and sprays in the general direction of Rod. Trump: Sorry Rod, there is a horrible stench in here. Now, what was it you wanted to see me about? Rod: Face glaring red, his head about to explode.)

Will there be cameras and recordings present? Would love to see that meeting!

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
Thursday morning (Trump: Rod, please have a seat. Rod: Thank You. Trump pulls out a can of Lysol and sprays in the general direction of Rod. Trump: Sorry Rod, there is a horrible stench in here. Now, what was it you wanted to see me about? Rod: Face glaring red, his head about to explode.)

Will there be cameras and recordings present? Would love to see that meeting!

Twenty stars for that. I see his ears venting steam before he blows.

So, this was just dropped on /pol/. As always, your mileage may vary, but this is certainly interesting if true:

For your consideration:

I have recordings created by three individuals (who will remain unnamed for now) which contain brainstorming sessions and meetings where U.S. Democratic Senators, staff, and other parties conspire to commit fraud against the United States Senate and Judge Kavanaugh by derailing his Supreme Court confirmation and destroying his personal and professional reputation.

These recordings were given to me by two current U.S. Senate staffers employed by Democratic Judiciary Committee members and one person employed by an outside organization being used to "handle" Democratic party operatives for their public accusations and possible testimony before the committee. These staffers were present at these meetings and conference calls, and are concerned about the manner in which this has proceeded. (from here on out referred to collectively as JudComStaff+1)

JudComStaff+1 are both Democrats and patriots. They don't particularly want Kavanaugh confirmed but are disgusted and disheartened by the methods their Senators, fellow staffers, and organization are using to derail this process.

Cont...

They feel obligated to come forward in this way to hold those who are breaking the law and/or otherwise falsely destroying the career and reputation of a U.S. Federal judge. They are also hopeful that by providing this evidence they will be given immunity to testify should the need or opportunity arise.

One's direct words to me were "The unbelievable tactics of this 11th hour smear and delay campaign is nothing less than wholesale corruption of our purpose as public servants."

I've listened to the recordings several times now. A long day and a sleepless night, and now another morning. What they contain will churn the stomach of any red blooded United States citizen, regardless of party. It's all I can do not to release this now. We all have our ideas about how government should work, but to hear our elected officials and their employees operating in such a way has shaken my faith in our government. These recordings are reminisent of a 1980's mafia movie. The scope of this is NOT LIMITED TO JUDICIARY COMMITTEE members.

The instructions given to me by JudComStaff+1 are this:

Should Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation be derailed as a result of the patently false, manufactured, and PAID FOR accusations, of which these recordings have direct evidence of, I am instructed to email or otherwise disseminate the recordings to a pre-selected list of journalists and prominent bloggers, as well as release them to the public via any means available.

Why was this information entrusted to me? Two reasons, a common connection, and my technical skills. And yes, Dead Man's Switch engaged. Why post it here first?

See you again soon, frogposters.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

The information should be released now. Seems like another move in a game.

Where I come from it's called a tease and I'm getting mighty sick of it.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

PJ,

Question since you follow those areas. I noticed that recently, month or so, that there is much less "insider anon" stuff leaking out. For quite a while there was very good insider stuff leaking out of the chans in various forms, but of late there seems to be less. Curious if you see this as the case.

I really like the idea that a group of 10 high ranking military or intelligence officers are reading through 8ch and responding to users.

What a sorry state our military is in if this is true.


Q chooses 8ch to get the message out... 8ch, the place where gore porn is common place. Great idea.
Or perhaps ATS is a good place... where as soon as someone posts something with even the hint of skepticism you rally the wagons and tell each other to ignore them. (I can hear you typing already).

/BO/ thank you for your service
People are scattered since Reddit termination
What about starting a trusted VOAT board under your direction?
If you build it - they will come.
Q

Notice the change in tone? Q = BO.

[RR] attempts to stall DECLAS and/or REDACT have FAILED.
Got popcorn?
Enjoy the show.
Q

Disinfo lol

Congression al sources 'blindsided' by Trump decision to back off FISA declassification

Guess it doesn't matter at this point. Follow the rabbit.

Just jumping in with the numbers thing again . ..



Date here is 7th September = 07/09/2018 = 27 = 9

Post number 2108 = 11

9-11

7th September is 17 days ago.


(quietly steps back out)

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Sabre, I just noticed something that (I don't think) has been raised before:

"AWARENESS OF ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL, TREASONOUS ACTS [MOVIES 1-3 FULL LIST]."

Is this saying:
Movie #1 - proves there were illegal acts,
Movie #2 - arrests the criminals,
Movie #3 - proves some of those criminals committed treason (after the ramp up of #1, #2 gains public buy-in)?