TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

a reply to: CaPpedDoG

PREPARE FOR 'SKY IS FALLING' WEEK.

Indeed.

[1:06:44]

a reply to: CoramDeo

I just had a thought...mostly tangential to the Q thing...but related in the larger picture.

Am I the only one noticing how ridiculously lame the Kavanaugh accuser's case is?


Almost as if..."someone"....is using Kavanaugh as a fulcrum or springboard...to discredit the entire PoundMeToo movement.

Maybe Kavenaugh's appointment is just being used to set a high (emotional) bar, for future accusations/court proceedings, which will likely involve high officials...including elected ones from all sides of all the aisles...

Perhaps this is an example of deep state actors or minions, delving down to at least 4D chess?


ETA: Could it be that their game might be getting better, because all the old school methods have proven worthless...and they are now trying some internal you ng Turk stuff?


ETAagain: maybe negotiations with young Turks might be a good way to at least explore?

Q2272 - The Sky is falling week.

Sounds like a Chicken Little the world is ending reference but what if it means Rupert Murdoch. Grand schemer and owner of Sky and other news outlets globally.

a reply to: CoramDeo


Is message #2272 implying that Democrats/Deep-State will use Kavanaugh and Declassification to initiate "The Sky is Falling!" alarm bells this week?

Look forward to a week of justice.

So let me get this straight.

RR leaked the NYT article to force Trump to fire him?

ETA: And we'll have aliens panicking people this week?

Man this # is turning into a Hollywood movie.

a reply to: Enderdog

I have no doubt that this is a trial baloon to see if the tactic of just an accusation can bring down an otherwise unblemished candate for any office. I also think that it is going to burn some candidates who try this tactic in the future.

How do you remove the opposition?

How do you legally skirt campaign finance laws?

What does it mean to go to war?

How much are you (they) willing to sacrifice?

I can see a future where willing participants who were past acquaintances of a candidate, Judge, LEO, etc. are paid to "tell their story". The agreed payoff is a promise to fund the effort through Gofundme or a circuit on complicit news networks to where the accuser is paid to give an excluclusive.

If this effort is successfu against Kavanaugh, yes, you will see it employed on both sides to take down opposition candidates. If it is unsuccessful, you will see it used as a defense when actual criminality is being investigated. (See Harvey Weinstein and Asia Argento).

In responding to your post, I'll end there, since this post is off-topic. I don't know how this is answered in a Q context, but I think, without the application of common sense and common decency respecting each other as human beings, we are headed for some dark days ahead.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: CoramDeo


Is message #2272 implying that Democrats/Deep-State will use Kavanaugh and Declassification to initiate "The Sky is Falling!" alarm bells this week?

I think they already have. I believe the effort is to create a constitutional crisis, or to bait POTUS into what looks like a constitutional crisis.

Remember that perception changes minds, perception changes votes, and perception is reality.

If it is perceived that the "sky is falling", those who hold the reigns of power will be blamed.

Is Kavanaugh being used as a springboard to create that perception? Yup.

Does Q mean "the sky is falling' that wai in post #2272? I think what Q is saying is that the attempt to paint POTUS into a corner is going to come crashing down on the heads of those whot are trying to do that.

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: Enderdog

I have no doubt that this is a trial baloon to see if the tactic of just an accusation can bring down an otherwise unblemished candate for any office. I also think that it is going to burn some candidates who try this tactic in the future.

How do you remove the opposition?

How do you legally skirt campaign finance laws?

What does it mean to go to war?

How much are you (they) willing to sacrifice?

I can see a future where willing participants who were past acquaintances of a candidate, Judge, LEO, etc. are paid to "tell their story". The agreed payoff is a promise to fund the effort through Gofundme or a circuit on complicit news networks to where the accuser is paid to give an excluclusive.

If this effort is successfu against Kavanaugh, yes, you will see it employed on both sides to take down opposition candidates. If it is unsuccessful, you will see it used as a defense when actual criminality is being investigated. (See Harvey Weinstein and Asia Argento).

In responding to your post, I'll end there, since this post is off-topic. I don't know how this is answered in a Q context, but I think, without the application of common sense and common decency respecting each other as human beings, we are headed for some dark days ahead.

Cynical af. I like it! ;o)

For the good of mankind, and CADpro.



QPost 2272

"Bridge" 1 (analog >|< digital)

"Bridge" 2 (digital >|< wet-ware)

"Bridge" 3 (wet-ware >|< ????)

originally posted by: eisegesis
"Bridge" 1 (analog > digital)

"Bridge" 2 (digital > wet-work)

"Bridge" 3 (wet-work > ?????)

>black goo....

ETA: Not actually goo....nano AI bots. But, it looks like goo!

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
Before technology it took a long time to spread information, good and bad.

Now it only takes a click of your mouse.

So after 11 threads of cheering this great tool that allowed people to be awoken it now needs to be shut down?

That is quite the 180. It seems odd that censorship is even an option when everyone is also asking for declassification.

So the new official Q Voat page is called QRV (QReasearch_Voat).

QRV in ham speak means "Are you ready?" I thought that was rather interesting

Re Q Pot #2272 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub:


Surely the most important line in this post is:

ALL SIGNERS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER GJ INVESTIGATION.

This expands on #2128 and clarifies that the investigation quoted there is by Grand Jury:


Remember that no FISA courts were held and I think we discovered on this thread that the alternative was for AG[LL] or ex-POTUS[BHO] to sign-off.

In #2106 we are told the following signers of the FISA warrant:

Re_review important.
Who signed?
Who signed pg 380?
Who signed pg 389?
Who signed pg 390?
Who signed pg 391?
Who signed pg 392?
Pg 389 - Andrew McCabe
Pg 391 - Rod Rosenstein
Pg 271 - Dana Boente
Pg 269 - James Comey
Pg [ ] - Sally Yates

So we have, in ascending page order:
269 = James Comey
271 = Dana Boente
380 = ?
389 = Andrew McCabe
390 = ?Sally Yates?
391 = Rod Rosenstein
392 = ? Loretta Lynch or Hussein?

If pg 392 was signed by Loretta Lynch and she is under Grand Jury investigation then this explains her "talking" as shown in #2259 and #2260.

However, if pg 380 was signed by Loretta Lynch then pg 392 could be signed by BHO? If this was the case then that's a pretty big drop to tell us the previous president is under Grand Jury investigation!!

Worth considering this in light of the following lines from #1943:

Who must sign off on FISA warrants?
Who directs the signers?
Given magnitude of spy campaign (U.S. Presidential Election Republican Party Nominee Candidate + President Elect + President of the United States) would HUSSEIN be required to DIRECT ORDER?
How would updates occur?
PDB?
Who has access to the PDB?
On-site CLAS briefings / SIT ROOM / OO / PEOC / N_C?
How often does a President use PEOC?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Excellent work oveRcuRrEnteD!

It looks like you've done a lot of work grouping articles which will be very beneficial.

Can I ask if you intend to make the archive available for others to download? Say, through Dropbox?

I will absolutely make it available. It may take me a day or two to set it up...

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Much thanks in anticipation - I know how much work it takes!