TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -12-

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Enderdog

I don't know about that. I'm skeptical of those who claim they've received prophecy in these times, not because I don't believe it exists, but because I don't believe this is precisely how God works.

Stuff like SCOTUS are ours to make or unmake. It's to us to be righteous with it or not. God very seldom moves specially in events now, and the next time he moves openly most people will be wishing He hadn't.

As to how I choose where to place my support? I look at which candidate is least likely to be hostile and support policies hostile to me living life according to my faith. If I can't have a Godly man or woman, then I need one who won't be hostile to me in my personal quest to try to be a Godly/worthy/good as I can, and it's plenty clear there are forces at work that want to dictate what is considered acceptable morality and faith for a person to have and to live.

Yeah. I hear you. These are people I care for. They are never going to parse reality, in the way that I do. But, they are going to interact in society, every day. And I like the idea of a peaceful religious path for people to proceed along, if that is their bent. Mine is not religious...though I do believe in a larger "Source".

But, I like the people I like. And I want them to be happy too.

ETA: Thanks for being here ketsuko.I truly enjoy reading your thoughts and contemplating mine own, with those filters in mind.

Namasté

Re Q Post #2347 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub - "REDOCTOBER2.jpg"

CORRECTED BY phoenix358 - These are Russian ensign flags.

I've investigated the Flags on the submarine in the picture:


As far as I can tell, these are:

NOT Country Flags
NOT International Maritime Signals

However, the first flag IS almost a REVERSE of the UNION JACK:
It has a RED background instead of BLUE
It has a WHITE + instead of a RED + with white border
It has a BLUE X with WHITE border instead of a RED X with WHITE border
It has the X on top of the + obscuring it instead of the + obscuring the X

The second flag is almost the reverse of the SCOTTISH flag (St. Andrew's cross or Saltire):
It has a WHITE background instead of BLUE
It has a BLUE X instead of WHITE

I think these flags denote the Deep State Armed Forces!

Worth noting also that the US had a submarine base in Holy Loch in Scotland.

a reply to: TomLawless

I'm still blown away that when President Trump says he is helping Americans "take our country back", HE MEANS IT. Every single action he has taken, via Congress, or by Executive Order, has been solidly PRO AMERICAN CITIZEN. It's like he's been planning his moves, and taking into account moves the "enemy" would make...for decades.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Re Q Post #2347 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub - "REDOCTOBER2.jpg"

I've investigated the Flags on the submarine in the picture:

As far as I can tell, these are:

NOT Country Flags
NOT International Maritime Signals

However, the first flag IS almost a REVERSE of the UNION JACK:
It has a RED background instead of BLUE
It has a WHITE + instead of a RED + with white border
It has a BLUE X with WHITE border instead of a RED X with WHITE border
It has the X on top of the + obscuring it instead of the + obscuring the X

The second flag is almost the reverse of the SCOTTISH flag (St. Andrew's cross or Saltire):
It has a WHITE background instead of BLUE
It has a BLUE X instead of WHITE

I think these flags denote the Deep State Armed Forces!

Worth noting also that the US had a submarine base in Holy Loch in Scotland.

I investigated this myself yesterday ... great minds and all that

The top flag is the Jack of the Russian Navy.

The second flag is the Ensign of the Russian Navy also called St Andrew's flag.

Russian Flags

P

a reply to: pheonix358

Thanks for setting me straight phoenix!

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Disclaimer: this is NOT a call for violence or harassment.

These are the 9 Republican votes for Nay on Kavanaugh.

TAMMY BALDWIN - N - WISCONSIN
SHERROD BROWN - N - OHIO
BOB CASEY - N - PENNSYLVANIA
JOE DONNELLY - N - INDIANA
HEIDI HEITKAMP - N - NORTH DAKOTA
DOUG JONES - N - ALABAMA
CLAIRE McCASKILL - N - MISSOURI
BILL NELSON - N - FLORDIA
JON TESTER - N - MONTANA

If you live in one of these states, get on the phone or write some letters and have your friends do the same.

Memes are cool too. 😎

These are Dems.

Dems whose light is getting Dimmer.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

McCaskill is, regrettably for us in Missouri, a Democrat. We will be trying yet again to change that this November.

Heitkamp is a democrat and so deep underwater against her challenger that I don't think she thought a yes would save her.

Sherrod Brown is popular in Ohio as a democrat and probably figures that popularity will keep him afloat with a no vote.

Donnelly was within 2 points in his race against his Republican challenger in Indiana. He was considering yes, and I thought if Manchin jumped and said yes, he might too to try to pull his race out because Indiana is traditionally red. Guess not.

I don't know about any of the rest except that they're Democrats.

How am I doing?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TomLawless

I'm still blown away that when President Trump says he is helping Americans "take our country back", HE MEANS IT. Every single action he has taken, via Congress, or by Executive Order, has been solidly PRO AMERICAN CITIZEN. It's like he's been planning his moves, and taking into account moves the "enemy" would make...for decades.

Now that is some serious Chess....Long Game....best ever!

originally posted by: FlyingFox
How am I doing?

Need 100 more.....lol!

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: IAMTAT

red state Dems is what he meant I think

Oops!

Yes that's what I meant, thanks.

Sorry. Longgg day.

a reply to: Aallanon

Coincidentally? I was looking this pm for the Trump prophecy by Kim Clemment because my daughter had not heard it and ran across Mark Taylor for the first time. Then saw your post

Later I call my son (it is his birthday) and he mentioned Mark Taylor.

Now I am not a christian (tho both children are) but do believe we are part of something larger, perhaps a higher self/higher source.

Just thought it an interesting coincidence, if such exist at random. Personally, I don't believe in random coincidences. I believe in people not paying attention.

a reply to: FlyingFox

You're doing GREAT

Not even a meme....but a pic from Jan 2016 of Trump and Barron....I mean the foreshadowing...come on....

a reply to: pheonix358

Has anyone identified the sub?

K-560 Severodvinsk

Some concerning DECODES on Q Post #2348 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub.

twitter.com...📁
And so it begins..
How do you start a WAR?
[Markers] matter.
Playbook [FAIL].
Q

1) Timestamp/Delta2Acronym methods:
PWF = Playing With Fire
GMF = Guided Missile Facility
AUA = America Under Attack
ACH = Anything Can Happen

2) Guccifer/Florida method:
Using "Q" gives ct6 oaa (OAA = Over the Air Activation signal!! ct6 could mean "caught 6")
Using "P" gives ./1o WtA (WtA = Winner takes All, OR Watch the Air)
Using "q" gives 5R = 5 Red?
Using "p" gives 1W = 1 White?

3) COVFEFE method:
Using "[Markers]" gives IAKMJT = Initial Activation Key, Moral Judgement Test
Using "[Fail]" gives ITKDKL = In The Know, Dems Kill?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Yasen Class Wiki

K-329 Severodvinsk went on her first voyage in September 2011 in order to conduct sea trials.[28] On 9 November 2011 Russia signed a contract for 4 Yasen-class submarines to be delivered by 2016.[29] On 26 July 2013 the third submarine, Novosibirsk, was laid down. On 30 December 2013 the first submarine, Severodvinsk, was handed over to the Russian Navy. The flag-raising ceremony was held on 17 June 2014 marking its introduction into the Russian Navy.[

Most likely photo is Severodvinsk.......?

Severodvinsk, City of, Global Security

Severodvinsk is an inspectable SLBM facility under the START-1 agreement. It is one of two SLBM loading facilities -- the other is located at Okol'naya. The United States and the Soviet Union signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) on 31 July 1991. When START entered into force on 05 December 1994, the signatories began to implement the Treaty's complex set of intrusive inspection and verification measures. As part of START's verification provisions, each signatory was required to declare all facilities related to ICBMs, submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and heavy bombers. The former Soviet Union (FSU) has declared over five dozen START-inspectable sites in all categories, including five SLBM facilities and six submarine facilities

Maybe someone can discern double meaning referred to.......

a reply to: dashen

I had to look up "rager". It's a good thing I did. Was thinking that was a LEGIT Donald Trump tweet.
www.urbandictionary.com...

a reply to: liveandlearn

I am careful on the idea that God moved Trump into position. I think it possible He did, but if He did, then it very possibly isn't the great thing we might be tempted to think it is.

It may very well mean that even darker times are on the way, not because Trump will bring them but because it just isn't God's practice to affect change like this unless there is need or it's coming down to that particular time.

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: pheonix358

Has anyone identified the sub?

K-560 Severodvinsk

K-560 Severodvinsk is a Yasen-class nuclear attack submarine

Commissioned 2013 ... in active service.

K-560

P

Edit: Things move fast around here. My link has the same image.