It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 727Sky
a reply to: Asktheanimals
Thanks I had not seen or heard that video.. I have never been a 9/11 truther other than thinking and believing (later) the official story had some really big holes in it.
I was passing over Jamaica at 39,000 ft. when I was told we would not be allowed to continue on our flight plan to the USA. So myself along with 6 crew members and 150 (?) passengers spent the next three days in Cozumel before we we allowed to return to the states.. Of course the company kept us informed and the news on T.V. was showing so we were up to speed with the current thoughts on 9/11.
There was some serious money made from 9/11 with stocks and what appears to be advanced knowledge of the event by a select few. But that is all history now..
Thanks for adding something to this thread.
a 15 minute cell phone conversation from flight 93 when above 25,000 has been debunked .. My cell phone never worked at altitude when I was flying... Maybe a wrong brand ?
Pure BS...I see Cars wrapped around lightpoles all the time....absolutely wrapped around wooden poles.2500 lbs of metal and steel.....wrapped around a wooden pole.....the pole doesn't get sliced through......lol.....nor did those buildings get ripped open by an Aluminum airliner....LMAO.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: one4all
Pure BS...I see Cars wrapped around lightpoles all the time....absolutely wrapped around wooden poles.2500 lbs of metal and steel.....wrapped around a wooden pole.....the pole doesn't get sliced through......lol.....nor did those buildings get ripped open by an Aluminum airliner....LMAO.
Because the plane did not penetrate the columns, it snapped them off at weakest points - the welds holding the spandrel plates and bolts connecting column sections together
Here is column section knocked out of building
sites.google.com...
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: 727Sky
a 15 minute cell phone conversation from flight 93 when above 25,000 has been debunked .. My cell phone never worked at altitude when I was flying... Maybe a wrong brand ?
One - out of 37 calls received from United 93, only 2 were from cell phones, most were made using the AIR FONE
system in the aircraft
Two - The cell phone calls were made at end of flight, when aircraft was flying at altitude of 8000 ft, Another
thing is that part of Pennsylvania is mountainous. Cell tower are placed on mountain ridges 3000 ft above
sea level, further reducing distance calls need to traverse.
a reply to: ntech
Compared to the milliwatts used by the Iphones and Androids of today. They were different phones.
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: one4all
BS ...shoot a feather out of a cannon....into a brick wall......inertia....lol.
What if it was a baseball instead of a feather and you threw it really hard.
what-if.xkcd.com...
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: ntech
Compared to the milliwatts used by the Iphones and Androids of today. They were different phones.
Slightly off topic - was researching early satellites. Was surprised by the transmitter power used
Explorer 1 (first US satellite) used transmitters of 60 milliwatt and 10 milliwatts
Vanguard 1 , weighed only 3 1/2 pounds had transmitters of 10 and 5 milliwatts - last one powered by first solar cells
Early lunar probes used only 100 milliwatts with distance of 700,000 miles