65 women defend Kavanaugh as 'a good person' amid allegations

a reply to: IAMTAT

A professor at Palo Alto University admitted she wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic senator from California, alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, The Washington Post reported.

www.statesman.com... dium=Facebook&utm_campaign=statesman

a reply to: Wardaddy454

The woman has now spoken out. Christine Blasey Ford...a liberal psychology professor from California.

Now that she's come forward this is going to be a fight for Kavanaugh now.

Ridiculous, people are supposed to be assumed innocent and this is literally high school crap. Diane Feinstein just sent another letter to FBI demanding investigation since she came forward.

www.washingtonpost.com... xual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.b08b44e1804e

a reply to: kaylaluv


A far-Left activist whom spent the weekend deleting all of her social media accounts.

"BREAKING: Writer of Confidential Kavanaugh Letter Speaks Out – She’s a Far-Left Activist!"
www.thegatewaypundit.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

I’d like to see proof she’s a “far left activist”.

I’m sure she deleted her social media accounts because she knows the backlash she’s going to get from the right now that she is out in the open.

Did you read the part in the article where her therapist has notes regarding the incident during couple’s therapy in 2012? Way before anyone knew he was going to be Trump’s appointee?

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IAMTAT

I’d like to see proof she’s a “far left activist”.

I’m sure she deleted her social media accounts because she knows the backlash she’s going to get from the right now that she is out in the open.

Did you read the part in the article where her therapist has notes regarding the incident during couple’s therapy in 2012? Way before anyone knew he was going to be Trump’s appointee?

I read where the therapist's notes conflict with what she's saying now...saying four students did it, instead of two...and how Kavanaugh's name wasn't even mentioned.

Predictably, she blames her therapist for getting the facts wrong back then.

a reply to: IAMTAT

If so, nothing suspicious there, is there?

Christ, whatta freak show.

Presumed guilt, 'til proven innocent seems to be the theme here.

AJC report.

Apparently, he's never named in the counseling sessions. Just as two boys who attended "an elitist boys school", and went on to become "highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”

OK. No names. 'til now, of course.

I find it most amusing, in an ironic sort of way, that...

Shauna Thomas, executive director of the women’s group UltraViolet, said in a statement Sunday that her organization supported Ford. “We believe women and we believe Christine Blasey Ford,” Thomas’ statement read. “Ford has demonstrated tremendous courage in coming forward and sharing her story of how Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. She is a hero and we have her back.”

But they don't believe the 65 other women, what they're not women? Kinda selective in their support of women, aren't they? Couldn't have anything to do with the political stances they support, could it?? Naaah, not possible.

Although, from what I understand, those 65 women encompass many political persuasions...

I look forward to the completely impartial "investigation" being called for.

We won't worry about the rather dubious timing...or the fact that no names were mentioned, at any time, 'til now.

You want to investigate? Fine, do so...just lose your attempts at some form of moral high-ground...you have none.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Four students from the elite school were at the party; two students were in the room during the incident. Easy to explain that mistake. No names were in the notes, but the two were described as being in upper positions in D.C. as adults.

It’s enough to create some doubt and some problems for Kavanaugh. But, color me surprised when her own character starts to be attacked by the right.

a reply to: kaylaluv

What about the other 65 women? Are they all liars?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Ok , this Woman is Now on a Slippery Slope of Possible Perjury Charges if She decides to Swear to Her Story Under Oath . What has She to Gain , or what was Promised to Her for coming Forward at THIS TIME ? People Wanna Know.........

The Dems are starting to look like a Keystone Cops movie.

You can't help but laugh at their idiocy, but, unfortunately, they are dead serious about the by-any-means-necessary tactic. They truly believe lying, cheating, stealing, sabotaging, etc. is a legitimate tactic to winning.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: kaylaluv

What about the other 65 women? Are they all liars?

Not necessarily. Just because he didn’t do anything to them doesn’t mean it’s impossible that he did something to this woman.

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: kaylaluv

What about the other 65 women? Are they all liars?

Not necessarily. Just because he didn’t do anything to them doesn’t mean it’s impossible that he did something to this woman.

Hearsay ..................Talk About Stretching a Lie...........

a reply to: kaylaluv

She deserves to be attacked verbally, not physically. Let me make sure that's clear. She's a loony, imo, making things up for "a higher loyalty" to her party, and the femenazi movement. A loony California psychologist that has to go to a therapist herself?? C'mon. Enough is enough.

a reply to: queenofswords

You got something against couples therapy/marriage counseling?

a reply to: queenofswords

a reply to: kaylaluv

Sure, I can see this...you seem to. Why doesn't the group mentioned in my link say just that?

The implication of Ms. Thomas' statement is that all those women are lying...but that Ms. Ford isn't.

I care not for the politics involved, if he did it, he should burn. If he didn't, will he get the public apology due him, from anyone??

You and I both know the answer to that.

An honest investigation is probably not possible at this date. Too many far too entrenched interests are now doing battle. Someone, irregardless of the facts, is going to get away with something rather heinous.

If he did do this thing, and gets approved anyway...

If he didn't, and gets crucified anyway...

Or he did it, and doesn't get approved...

So, to my mind, two-thirds of the possible results means the liar got away with something...and that side will claim victory, and justice has been achieved. Do I need to say just what kind of Bull# that claim would be??

He didn't do it and anybody with a smidgen of common sense can see what this is all about. He will get confirmed and be on the bench by October 1. We can't let the loony bin run the show. Enough is enough.

Look what they tried to do to Clarence Thomas. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

a reply to: seagull

I see no such implication in your quote that the other women are all lying. There is no mention of the other women - only the mention of Ford.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IAMTAT

I’d like to see proof she’s a “far left activist”.

I’m sure she deleted her social media accounts because she knows the backlash she’s going to get from the right now that she is out in the open.

She was known by Cernovich's source as a far-left activist before Friday and so it's a safe bet her social media was preserved, before she started deleting everything incriminating to her.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: IAMTAT

I’d like to see proof she’s a “far left activist”.

I’m sure she deleted her social media accounts because she knows the backlash she’s going to get from the right now that she is out in the open.

She was known by Cernovich's source as a far-left activist before Friday and so it's a safe bet her social media was preserved, before she started deleting everything incriminating to her.

That Information Alone should be a RED FLAG that this Story , and the Timing of it is PURE B.S . . Remember ALL the Women Before the 2016 Presidential Election that came Forward with Sexual Misconduct Charges against then Candidate Donald J. Trump ? The M.O. of that is Clearly Evident here.............