Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset.

a reply to: neutronflux

Donald Trump could shoot your mother right in front of you and you would be saying there must be some other explanation.

a reply to: neutronflux

That cannot be explained by other means?

Yeah av seen a few decent documentaries that point to some pretty shady stuff having gone down.

So, how and why in the proof he is unjustly favoring Russian to justify “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset“

Ok guess what my answer is....

Read the article, thats exactly what I posted it and I am not posting anything as proof just like I keep saying to you (hey read this its got some interesting stuff in it).

Actually you seem to be constantly misunderstanding what I am writing to you and refusing to read the article, can you read?

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: neutronflux

Donald Trump could shoot your mother right in front of you and you would be saying there must be some other explanation.

No.

There is a difference between innuendo.
Vs evidence.
Vs credible evidence.
Vs allegations.
Vs credible allegations.
Vs using credible evidence to create a credible allegation based on a logical argument.

Posting links to many articles, providing no context, and citing no specific evidence is not proof of anything. It’s called innuendo.

If you think Trump is unduly favoring Russia compared to other nations, or over the USA, please cite a specific example. State a policy, or what Trump is doing to illegally provide Russia intelligence? Some sort of constructed argument?

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

It came up in the debate, remember?

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

It came up in the debate, remember?

And what happen to that point? How long ago was the debate?

a reply to: neutronflux

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC

That is fine you are aloud to disagree with the idea that Trump is a Russian intelligence asset, I am not even saying I believe it and its my thread.

If you disagree fine.

You might still find the article interesting just because it sets out that case, might just help you understand why some people might chose to believe it.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Out of real objectivity from credible evidence? Or wishful thinking from innuendo?

If anyone is interested there is a new documentary that came out just a few weeks ago that also kind of goes quite in-depth into the relationship between Trump and Russia its called "Active measures"

Well worth a watch if you found the article interesting.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

It came up in the debate, remember?

And what happen to that point? How long ago was the debate?

Weeks before the election. People went to the polls and voted for him even tough there was already reason to believe he was being blackmailed by Russia. Think about that.

a reply to: DJW001

Just curious, have you seen the documentary I suggested, I think you would enjoy it.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

It came up in the debate, remember?

And what happen to that point? How long ago was the debate?

Weeks before the election. People went to the polls and voted for him even tough there was already reason to believe he was being blackmailed by Russia. Think about that.

Like to cite a credible source? And any evidence it is guiding his policy?

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

If it holds no credible evidence or empty allegations, why?

Sorry, I really do believe if they was credible evidence of “Is Trump a Russian Intelligence Asset” it would be a major DNC / media taking point. Or just enough evidence to get the allegation to stick would be enough for the DNC.

It came up in the debate, remember?

And what happen to that point? How long ago was the debate?

Weeks before the election. People went to the polls and voted for him even tough there was already reason to believe he was being blackmailed by Russia. Think about that.

Like to cite a credible source? And any evidence it is guiding his policy?

Aarrrgh.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: DJW001

Just curious, have you seen the documentary I suggested, I think you would enjoy it.

No; I will try to find it somewhere.

a reply to: DJW001

You have a serious compassion for your captors! Hillary would have embraced Agenda 21 and you'd be in an internment camp by now. If you'd like, report to your local Wal-Mart before the Dems turn it into a holding cell for you!

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Lol that wouldn't happen, you have guns to fight tyranny remember. No US government forces could ever defeat the organised militia and their AR15'S.

a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

And yet, during Katrina, they tried to disarm people and were largely successful. And remember the Boston Bombing and the ensuing Martial Law crackdown where everyone was made to stay in their houses?

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

And yet, during Katrina, they tried to disarm people and were largely successful. And remember the Boston Bombing and the ensuing Martial Law crackdown where everyone was made to stay in their houses?

Where do you get your "news?"

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

You have a serious compassion for your captors! Hillary would have embraced Agenda 21 and you'd be in an internment camp by now. If you'd like, report to your local Wal-Mart before the Dems turn it into a holding cell for you!

What kind of brownies have you been eating.....?

a reply to: DJW001

C'mon those news stories are a surprise to you?