Conservative's should be supporting Colin Kaepernak

a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

a reply to: underwerks

So, you can move the goal posts to suit your needs now. Amazing. And you wonder why Trump won.

On top of the fact politicans on both sides are corrupt. But you chose to call out right wing.

In addition, Kap didn't have this mindset until he started dating a BLM leader. Have you ever stopped to think he's maybe being used for an agenda?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

See, that's just it. I went from voting Dem party lines because that's what I thought was the right thing to do, to voting my conscience and safe guarding the Constitution. But, then again. This is the internet remember? I could be lying right to your internet face.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

The government throwing table scraps at me while some of the biggest receivers of welfare (big business) get the lions share doesn’t exactly get me to doing the happy dance. You may be happy accepting that. I’m not.

Reality is miserable a lot of times. But at least it’s real. I don’t expect you to think like me and I’d be surprised if anyone does. It’s not a warm and fluffy way to go through life.

originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha

#notallliberals

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

The government throwing table scraps at me while some of the biggest receivers of welfare (big business) get the lions share doesn’t exactly get me to doing the happy dance. You may be happy accepting that. I’m not.

Reality is miserable a lot of times. But at least it’s real. I don’t expect you to think like me and I’d be surprised if anyone does. It’s not a warm and fluffy way to go through life.

Yeah and painting all conservatives as evil isnt going to solve this problem. You might be surprised that some conservatives agree with you on corporate welfare.

a reply to: underwerks


*recap*

You generalized, they called you out on it, then you said prove me wrong, they replied info about themselves disproving the generalization.

originally posted by: rollanotherone
a reply to: underwerks

So, you can move the goal posts to suit your needs now. Amazing. And you wonder why Trump won.

On top of the fact politicans on both sides are corrupt. But you chose to call out right wing.

In addition, Kap didn't have this mindset until he started dating a BLM leader. Have you ever stopped to think he's maybe being used for an agenda?

What Democrat politicians are there in the White House to call out? Point me in the direction. As it stands, the current administration has eclipsed whatever the democrats may have been guilty of. You’d have to go back to Ulysses S. Grant, who let his friends physically loot the treasury, to reach the level of greed in this administration.

Unless Kaepernick is an actual robot, I’m sure he has a mind of his own and can think for himself regardless of who his girlfriend was. Everyone awakens at the speed they awaken. Maybe that was just his time.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: underwerks


*recap*

You generalized, they called you out on it, then you said prove me wrong, they replied info about themselves disproving the generalization.

And then I replied that I didn’t believe what strangers on the internet tell me about themselves.

At least get the timeline right.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

The government throwing table scraps at me while some of the biggest receivers of welfare (big business) get the lions share doesn’t exactly get me to doing the happy dance. You may be happy accepting that. I’m not.

There in lies your problem...
You think the government should be doing you any favors whatsoever. Yet you complain about "table scraps" like you are somehow owed something for simply existing. Welcome to the real world sport get used to it.

a reply to: underwerks

I didn't care what it was about. I was mad that he disrespected our fallen serviceman .

He could've picked another venue.

Maybe one that didn't divide the country .

a reply to: underwerks

That's odd because im continually told by liberals I should take peoples personal account as fact to deride the statistics that disprove their arguement.

a reply to: rollanotherone

Oh, hell, for all anyone here knows, I'm a 24-year-old pimply Russian hanging out in Putin's basement. You know, there are no real right-wingers. We're all either Russians or Russian bots now.

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

Here's the thing though ... where some people see idiocy, others don't.

ZOMG, tax cuts! Some people see idiocy. Others don't. Sometimes, we actually like keeping the money we make and don't think that's idiocy.

That's just one example.

That's why I said that I'd have to become like you in thought in order to prove you wrong. Maybe, you'll just have to accept that not everyone sees things the way you do. I accept that you see things differently. I get that you thought Obama was brilliant, but you believe in a very different worldview than I do. I disagree with it. I think you'd be very dissatisfied with it if and when it ever were to get fully realized, but since in order for you to see that, I'd have to get drug right along and be miserable with you, I'm unwilling to easily let that happen.

The government throwing table scraps at me while some of the biggest receivers of welfare (big business) get the lions share doesn’t exactly get me to doing the happy dance. You may be happy accepting that. I’m not.

There in lies your problem...
You think the government should be doing you any favors whatsoever. Yet you complain about "table scraps" like you are somehow owed something for simply existing. Welcome to the real world sport get used to it.

You’re misunderstanding me in your rush to make a point. I never said I expected anything from the government, I was just illustrating that the tax cuts don’t make me automatically like this administration. Because when you look closer, it’s almost a slap in the face of working people. Given the larger context.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: underwerks

That's odd because im continually told by liberals I should take peoples personal account as fact to deride the statistics that disprove their arguement.

Again, don’t believe what people tell you on the internet.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
a reply to: underwerks

I didn't care what it was about. I was mad that he disrespected our fallen serviceman .

He could've picked another venue.

Maybe one that didn't divide the country .

I still don’t get it. I’m seriously not trying to be difficult, I’m just trying to understand.

If you know it’s about police brutality how do you go from that to thinking it’s about dishonoring soldiers? How do you jump that gap?

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: underwerks

That's odd because im continually told by liberals I should take peoples personal account as fact to deride the statistics that disprove their arguement.

You're also supposed to respect a person's gender and not question it. Regardless if they have a beard, are 65 but claim to be an 8 years old girl named Jennifer.

a reply to: underwerks

Have you ever seen an American servicemen's coffin draped with a flag ? Do you know the lyrics to the Star-Spangled Banner ?


What is the song about ?