It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

China and Russia Have Set a Nuclear Collision Course With the United States

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: an325nt

originally posted by: AriAsulin

Nuclear bombs ARE (snip...)



What the hell are you talking about?


I'm not saying I believe this but here is a link: Nuke Lies



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: toms54

originally posted by: an325nt

originally posted by: AriAsulin

Nuclear bombs ARE (snip...)



What the hell are you talking about?


I'm not saying I believe this but here is a link: Nuke Lies


Well that was about as useful as a link to a webpage that claims to have proof that the earth is flat.




posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Don't worry it's likely an opinion piece designed for both sales and distraction . If they want to talk international affairs regarding these countries and don't mention the SCO it's probably best to assume the article/author are not particularly credible . Read facts and do your own thinking instead


The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), or Shanghai Pact,[1] is a Eurasian political, economic, and security alliance, the creation of which was announced on 15 June 2001 in Shanghai, China
Note the date



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ChefFox

To speak about the more than 15 to 20 thousand or so nuclear bombs in the world is doom porn?


As if humans haven’t already dropped a bomb and are not capable of doing it again, is doom porn, or are you just in denial.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: ZIPMATT
a reply to: Willtell

Don't worry it's likely an opinion piece designed for both sales and distraction . If they want to talk international affairs regarding these countries and don't mention the SCO it's probably best to assume the article/author are not particularly credible . Read facts and do your own thinking instead


The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), or Shanghai Pact,[1] is a Eurasian political, economic, and security alliance, the creation of which was announced on 15 June 2001 in Shanghai, China
Note the date





I’m not worried at all, just think it makes sense to deal with the issue, and not deny its reality



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog
Dang , more WW 3 Doom Porn
Been a while

And just looked , NORAD's DEFCON is still at "Fade Out"
Let me know when it goes to "Cocked Pistol"
NVM , you will not have time to let me know



Your the one who is hysterical. There isn’t any doom in the OP. Maybe you should actually read it.

It’s not doom porn it’s reasonable to at least think about the issue and soberly discuss it.

The US and Russia alone have over 15 thousand nuclear weapons, and that’s not counting China, NATO, Israel Pakistan and India.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: Gothmog
Dang , more WW 3 Doom Porn
Been a while

And just looked , NORAD's DEFCON is still at "Fade Out"
Let me know when it goes to "Cocked Pistol"
NVM , you will not have time to let me know



Your the one who is hysterical. There isn’t any doom in the OP. Maybe you should actually read it.

It’s not doom porn it’s reasonable to at least think about the issue and soberly discuss it.

The US and Russia alone have over 15 thousand nuclear weapons, and that’s not counting China, NATO, Israel Pakistan and India.

I would ask then , what's the point of comparing militaries ?
All countries develop weapons of war .

edit on 9/4/18 by Gothmog because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: Gothmog
Dang , more WW 3 Doom Porn
Been a while

And just looked , NORAD's DEFCON is still at "Fade Out"
Let me know when it goes to "Cocked Pistol"
NVM , you will not have time to let me know



Your the one who is hysterical. There isn’t any doom in the OP. Maybe you should actually read it.

It’s not doom porn it’s reasonable to at least think about the issue and soberly discuss it.

The US and Russia alone have over 15 thousand nuclear weapons, and that’s not counting China, NATO, Israel Pakistan and India.

I would ask then , what's the point of comparing militaries ?
All countries develop weapons of war .



It’s just a discussion on the leaders who might get us into a nuclear war and their armies.

No obsession or doom, just a sober attempt to discuss the issue.

I suggest isn’t it a wise thing to do for these leaders to be discussing the elimination of these weapons, or at least the idea of peace in light of the potential destructiveness of the nuclear weapons.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:05 PM
link   
This issue does not upset me. I get more upset about reading of a teenager killing herself climbing up a fire escape to get her smartphone.

This issue, although vital to discuss, is out of our range of direct influence. Its abstract yet shouldn’t be to us.


We should demand of our leaders to knock it off and make peace, but we just don’t. That in itself is interesting.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:09 PM
link   
Yeah lets ignore the hundreds of US/Nato bases around Russia and China.

Australia was asked by the US a year ago to stir up China with our Navy.

So par for the course China & Russia want to defend themselves.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: AriAsulin

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE

Nuclear bombs ARE FAKE



=WARNING=

Flat Earth nonsense will not be tolerated here! 😜



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: ausername

That link goes to a site that is very detailed and well documented. It's not just a page of short forum posts. Each one goes to a section that can take you deep into this rabbit hole. I found the section about Hiroshima to be the most persuasive.

Like I said, I do believe nukes exist. This site has modified my thinking somewhat about the relative effectiveness of the atom bomb versus the h bomb. Also I read an interesting piece by Jim Marrs on the subject once but I don't have a link handy. Maybe he posted about it on ATS.

Like I said, this is an involved site. You could not possibly have browsed it in the time it took for you to respond.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou




Good. Mankind need a reset.


Big diff between reset and wasteland of radioactivity.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Well just wait a few couple millIon years and we’ll be fine again.

Not like we never did it before anyways



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Nickn3




We have been making China stronger since Nixion’s first visit.


The whole world has been feeding the US vampiric system since the end of Bretton Woods and the rise of the US petrodollar.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Well just wait a few couple millIon years and we’ll be fine again.

Not like we never did it before anyways



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Historically, China and Russia don't get along, however, they seem to unite over a common enemy-the US. Any victory wouldn't last long; eventually, they'd just end up fighting each other for dominance.



posted on Sep, 4 2018 @ 08:19 PM
link   
There’s no need to invade a country already at war with itself.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Anyone who understands Chinese mindset understands war with China is almost inevitable. We will refuse to address the problem until it's too late.



posted on Sep, 5 2018 @ 07:17 AM
link   
a reply to: lostbook

And which party wants to prevent better Russian relations?




top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join