Asking the big question.

Everything we percieve is interpreted by the brains processing. The brain is a more complicated machine than the greatest super computer on earth. You know there can be no random process to build a super computer and so why would anyone be foolish enough to think the human brain evolved by natural chance.

There there is no such thing as random chance everything is happening the way its meant to happen. Your decision to turn left or right; what path leads to good fortune and what not; all preprogrammed.

We are living in a simulation there can be no doubt about it. All simulations have upgrades patches to fix the bugs in the system.

The bugs are paranormal activity.

Then there viruses.These are the conpiracy theorists.

Astronomical evidence of old universes are old servers.

Is there some audience out there watching us insipidly as if the earth is some kind of reruns of Gilligans island.
Asking the big question here.
Are we just a rerun of a TV series?

a reply to: AthlonSavage

While I agree that we are most likely living in some sort of simulation and has been repeated quite a lot. But this is something I would rather not know the answer to. Kinda like when you first hear the words “processed meat”. Just kinda take the fun out of eating a Slim Jim.

And also I have spent many a nights thinking about this and have given myself enough night terrors for one life.

But still a good thread and you get a star....No flag though as I can’t from my IPad....sorry but we can pretend

You just equated conspiracy theorists with computer viruses.
Hahaha

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Personally I don't like the term simulation. It questions the material reality and that is unquestionably there. But the perception of it could be some kind of coded display. The human experience could be a simulation not the universe itself.
I think.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

No one says that life came about by random chance.

The best explanation based on what we have observed is that life is a natural chemical reaction.

A cascade of inevitable reactions.

How well do you understand chemistry and what is to be expected when atoms and molecules interact with eachother under specific conditions?

While we may not have the exact recipe, we know that this is the most plausible explanation.

We know that life is made from inanimate materials. All of the same material that everything else is made of. There is nothing about us that works differently than what is to be expected.

We even share dna sequences with every other piece of life on the planet. Grass and mushrooms are distant cousins of ours.

a reply to: Woodcarver

If you dug up a watch from the sand in the beach and some one told you it was an inevitable creation of reaction of the sands to create inevitable sequences of structured molecules you would know they are talking BS.
There are complex functions going on it that watch.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Everything is mind, and you are the great spectator.

The question is what trick of our mind tires the soul to sleep?

a reply to: Woodcarver

Or we could have been created by aliens in the not too distant past. They intended us as slaves but another 'god' slipped into us a primitive soul from which we gained consciousness. We have been growing our souls through reincarnation and possibly will eclipse our creators at some point in the future.

But that doesn't even come close to describing this wonderful creation, this simulation or program. If this is all pre programmed or if we have free will doesn't seem to make much difference, as from our perspective it is still one foot in front of the other, one step at a time. We can describe our creation by intelligent means or by slow evolution, but does it really make a difference?

For we are alive, rejoice.

a reply to: AthlonSavage

If i found a watch, yes. Because i know where watches come from. Watches don’t come from other watches. Watches aren’t created by chemical reactions. Life is. Every person that has ever existed as well as every other form of life, was formed from a natural chemical reaction. Including you.

At our base, we are made from inanimate material that is held together by chemical bonds.

originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: Woodcarver

Or we could have been created by aliens in the not too distant past. They intended us as slaves but another 'god' slipped into us a primitive soul from which we gained consciousness. We have been growing our souls through reincarnation and possibly will eclipse our creators at some point in the future.

But that doesn't even come close to describing this wonderful creation, this simulation or program. If this is all pre programmed or if we have free will doesn't seem to make much difference, as from our perspective it is still one foot in front of the other, one step at a time. We can describe our creation by intelligent means or by slow evolution, but does it really make a difference?

For we are alive, rejoice.

could have been? How much supporting evidence can you provide that suggests we were made by aliens?

You would need to prove the existence of souls for this to have any credibility. Simply claiming that souls exist is not sufficient.

originally posted by: AthlonSavage
Everything we percieve is interpreted by the brains processing. The brain is a more complicated machine than the greatest super computer on earth. You know there can be no random process to build a super computer and so why would anyone be foolish enough to think the human brain evolved by natural chance.

There there is no such thing as random chance everything is happening the way its meant to happen. Your decision to turn left or right; what path leads to good fortune and what not; all preprogrammed.

We are living in a simulation there can be no doubt about it. All simulations have upgrades patches to fix the bugs in the system.

The bugs are paranormal activity.

Then there viruses.These are the conpiracy theorists.

Astronomical evidence of old universes are old servers.

Is there some audience out there watching us insipidly as if the earth is some kind of reruns of Gilligans island.
Asking the big question here.
Are we just a rerun of a TV series?

Yes....as you have so eloquently stated ….history does repeat itself....in 3657 year cycles...google Nibiru Gill Broussard and receive full disclosure the Governments will not provide you with.

a reply to: Woodcarver

Ah, I had forgotten that you are one of those people. My apologies.

I wonder, would life be more comforting if you only believed in what was able to be documented down to the smallest detail? I wonder if any of our sciences would still exist with that type of requirement.

The science foundation based on big bang would need to be completely eliminated as there is a lot of 'magic' on how the phenomena is described.

Do you believe in the big bang? Do you believe in dark matter and dark energy? Do you believe in black holes?

a reply to: AthlonSavage

Life as we perceive it is a lot like an old sitcom series rerun in the sense that we re-experience the same (or very similar) situations over the years until we learn whatever lessons the universe is trying to teach us, rerunning the same episode periodically until we change.

a reply to: ClovenSky

You seem to be conflating possible explanations, for probable explanations. Yes, i am one of those people who likes to hear and see all of the evidence for your claims before i make decisions on whether i think something is possible.

Big bang is an outdated term. It has been for a long time. The new term is inflation. That is how this works. As new information is put into the equation, the model is updated to account for it. Do you have some info about how aliens made people? I would love to see it, so we can update our model, that currently does not rely on alien intervention.

Dark matter and dark energy have likewise not been proven to exist. They are place holders for all of the matter that seems to be missing from the equations that were done to predict the amount of stuff in the universe and whether it would continue to expand, or collapse into itself.

South Park already did it

en.wikipedia.org...(South_Park)

Najix then explains he and the other aliens make a reality show called Earth, and all of Earth's species, such as Asians, bears, ducks, Jews, deer and Hispanics, are taken from their respective home planets for the purposes of the show, and everyone around the world is unknowingly being filmed and watched.

The scientist discovers this at the same time on Earth by translating the binary code that resulted from reversing the polarity of the message he proceeds to tell everyone, which leads the alien network heads to cancel the show and prepare to destroy the Earth...When word spreads to the rest of the planet that Earth is one big reality show, humans become elated that they're famous.

a reply to: Woodcarver

Excellent and well reasoned response. Thank you very much for sharing your insights. Maybe I do hope too much without valid reasoning or real world examples to back up my suspicions. Maybe I use intuition in the acceptance of certain theories where I should be using other sources. Maybe it is superstition in wanting the majority of the scientific mainstream info to be redesigned away from our antiquated and stand alone views of the cosmos. Maybe it is just my fantasy to believe there is another all encompassing explanation for this reality that would make us better as a species.

Wouldn't it be a kick if our universe wasn't expanding or contracting but static? That the red shift simply denotes the age of a galactic formation and has nothing to do with speed.

Again, thank you for your time.

Peace.

originally posted by: ClovenSky
a reply to: Woodcarver

Excellent and well reasoned response. Thank you very much for sharing your insights. Maybe I do hope too much without valid reasoning or real world examples to back up my suspicions. Maybe I use intuition in the acceptance of certain theories where I should be using other sources. Maybe it is superstition in wanting the majority of the scientific mainstream info to be redesigned away from our antiquated and stand alone views of the cosmos. Maybe it is just my fantasy to believe there is another all encompassing explanation for this reality that would make us better as a species.

Wouldn't it be a kick if our universe wasn't expanding or contracting but static? That the red shift simply denotes the age of a galactic formation and has nothing to do with speed.

Again, thank you for your time.

Peace.

But, we know that red shift is what we would expect to see when those bodies are moving away from us. We know exactly why and how it appears this way.

Why would you wish it was otherwise? Or even pretend? The whole point of these conversations is to riddle out the actual state of affairs and how this all actually works. To speculate that things could be working in ways that contradict what we observe is..... not only a waste of everyone’s time, but it actually does a fair amount of harm to the whole process of figuring out the universes actual secrets, because, when someone starts out on the path of reason, they have to unlearn all of the BS like this.

Is the universe not interesting enough as it is? Why do people feel like they need to paint so much fiction into the narrative? My guess is, that studying science and remembering facts is far more difficult.

those who are not willing to learn how to use the tools of reason and science will forever be far off of the mark when it comes to what is possible and what is probable.

originally posted by: AthlonSavage

Is there some audience out there watching us insipidly as if the earth is some kind of reruns of Gilligans island.
Asking the big question here.
Are we just a rerun of a TV series?

Audience
-The WATCHERS that didn't fall & their Cosmic/inter dimensional creations.
-The WATCHERS that did fall & their Cosmic/inter dimensional and or inner planetary creations.
-Ascended ancestors (of the current living) observing from metaphysical/spirit based locations.

Are we responsible for the reruns due to our immature action/behaviors within the Matrix?
And does maturity help to unite the many, which as many work as one and problem solve together helps them to escape the looping cycle of the generated reality?

Interesting question

originally posted by: AthlonSavage
a reply to: Woodcarver

If you dug up a watch from the sand in the beach and some one told you it was an inevitable creation of reaction of the sands to create inevitable sequences of structured molecules you would know they are talking BS.
There are complex functions going on it that watch.

So where did the first complexity emerge from?
Some kind of creator?
Where are they from?