Somebody's Lying — FBI Denies Evidence of Chinese Hacking Found on Clinton Email Server

a reply to: theantediluvian

The FBI is lying actually. The ICIG had a meeting where they informed the FBI that Clintons server was compromised by China.

a reply to: Xcathdra

www.youtube.com...

this is a video of it being discussed during Strzok's hearing that was televised real time.
I can't say for sure, but it sure looks like the FBI is completely full of sh!t on this. If I'm wrong, please explain it to me.

a reply to: vinifalou

You can say that all you want. Just makes you a liar too if that's what you claim because Every body knows that trump lies like a dog, lies like a rug, meaning constantly.
So you still sticking with that? It's arguing that the sky isn't blue.

Does anyone feel this may be a conflict of interest, where CrowdStrike's involvement in 'matters Hillary' are concerned?


CrowdStrike received $100,000,000 from GOOGLE.

Google leads $100 million investment in cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike

fortune.com...

GOOGLE is a Huge Hillary supporter.

4 Times Google Was Linked Directly to Hillary Clinton

www.breitbart.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

What does Google have to do with Hillary.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

What does Google have to do with Hillary.

What doesn't Google have to do with Hillary?

😎🤷😎

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

What does Google have to do with Hillary.

SO glad you asked.

Seek and ye shall find.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

What does Google have to do with Hillary.

what does wet have to to with water?

Thanks for always saying things that make me smile.

a reply to: network dude

Send Fox network to jail? tee hee

a reply to: Sillyolme

You have nothing of relevance to add to the OP as usual.

All you do is embarrass yourself and make it clear that you know nothing about anything other that Trump is a liar.

a reply to: highvein

If Faux wants to join CNN? Are you kidding. Fox was doing this waaaaaaaay before CNN did. They just followed Faux's lead.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude

Send Fox network to jail? tee hee

no, actually, the people responsible for spreading the news.

this may help you. I call it the 10% rule. It states that you must be at least 10% smarter than the object you are trying to fix. in this case, it's my post. you aren't quite up to the right number yet, but I have faith that in a year or two, you'll get there.

a reply to: Deetermined

Well check your source of information. That's not true. And a computer file is a computer file. If someone needs your files they don't get your actual CPU. You send it electronically.

And Crowd Strike did analysis for the FBI all the time.

You guys act like they're getting photocopies of photocopies of photocopies.
Think of it more as a clone. No compromise of DNA information because a clone is an exact replication of an original.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The problem with crowdstrike and your understanding of the situation is crowdstrike is not an unbiased source. They were paid by the DNC so their conclusion is biased. Secondly you have chain of custody issues as well.

Hence the reason law enforcement use their own labs - it controls chain of custody and provides an unbiased analysis of the evidence submitted for testing.

a reply to: Xcathdra

No they didnt. Why aren't they saying that then? Why wasn't is in their report?

Gimmie a break.

a reply to: xuenchen

Oh what am amazingly insightful response Foxy. I think I need a nap after absorbing that gem.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

No they didnt. Why aren't they saying that then? Why wasn't is in their report?

Gimmie a break.

Because the server was not hacked and by using crowdstrike they got the results they wanted to support the russia bs.

and yes crowdstrike was paid by the DNC. It was also paid by Clinton.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Really. Just like that huh. Should I Google Google /Hillary or The unknown Google Clinton connection?

a reply to: network dude

Sure what ev dude. You smile. I laugh till my sides split.

This constant delusion from the right is the best side show ever.
Don't ever change babe.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Deetermined

Well check your source of information. That's not true. And a computer file is a computer file. If someone needs your files they don't get your actual CPU. You send it electronically.

And Crowd Strike did analysis for the FBI all the time.

You guys act like they're getting photocopies of photocopies of photocopies.
Think of it more as a clone. No compromise of DNA information because a clone is an exact replication of an original.

Why does the FBI as a matter of routine behavior seize peoples computers, laptops and phones and tablets then?

Why didn't they just ask Cohen for a Copy?

Armed with court-approved search warrants, FBI agents fanned out across Manhattan and reportedly seized computers, tax documents, emails, communications and business documents from Cohen's home, his office at a law firm in Rockefeller Center and his hotel room on Park Avenue.