It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As the Syrian military prepares for perhaps the biggest and most bloody battle of the war – the battle to liberate Idlib – it appears that the West is preparing to make a stand of its own in defense of the head choppers and “moderate” cannibals it has supported since 2011. But while the US has twice used disproven claims of chemical weapons in Syria as a pretext to launch strikes against Syria, both of those strikes were relatively minor in terms of the damage they caused. However, America’s seemingly independent-of-the-executive branch military is already preparing for the possibility of strikes against Syria, having known this moment was coming now for months.
The staged attacks are allegedly being prepared by al-Nusra Front (Tahrir al-Sham) in Idlib. The MOD has stated that, in order to stage the attack, around eight canisters of chlorine have been delivered to a village near Jisr al-Shughur city. Another group of terrorists, who have allegedly been trained and prepped by private British security company Olive, have also recently arrived in the area. The group is to be disguised as White Helmets volunteers and will simulate a rescue operation involving locals who will be purportedly injured in the alleged attack.
The four Syrian children in the featured photograph were provided by MP Fares Shehabi , who tweeted Urgent: These kids were among many kidnapped by the White Helmets in the town of Zirbeh west of Aleppo to be used as victims in the upcoming chemical hoax. We hold the leaders of US/UK/France directly responsible for their safety.
Why would Damascus order CWs used against civilians its forces are liberating from US-supported terrorists?
Why now with most of the country freed from their control? Syrian ground and airpower, greatly aided by Russian aerial operations, are effectively defeating the scourge of ISIS and other terrorists in the country – using conventional, not banned weapons.
Claims otherwise are bald-faced lies. US-supported terrorists alone used CWs numerous times, including US/UK-produced toxins supplied by Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and perhaps Israel and Jordan.
US Pentagon contractors trained (and likely still train) terrorists in Jordan to use these weapons. Last year, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova explained that “Western states and regional countries have directly or indirectly supplied banned poisonous substances to militants, terrorists and extremists active in Syria.”
UNITED NATIONS, August 28. /TASS/. Syria’s permanent mission to the United Nations has presented documents proving terrorists’ plans to carry out a chemical weapons attack in the Syrian province of Idlib and put the blame on Damascus, Syrian Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar Jaafari said at a United Nations Security Council meeting on Tuesday.
According to him, the documents make it clear that the Jabhat al-Nusra terror group (outlawed in Russia) and some other terrorists pledged readiness to use chemical weapons against civilians in Idlib in order to put the blame on Syrian authorities and justify a foreign military aggression.
Jaafari pointed out that in April, the US and its allies had carried out an attack on Syria after a chemical weapons provocation. The Syrian envoy called on countries capable of influencing terrorists to prohibit their agents from taking any action.
According to him, Damascus condemned the use of chemical weapons no matter the circumstances and considered it to be immoral. Jaafari reiterated that the Syrian government did not have chemical weapons and was committed to its obligations to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which had informed the international community that Syria had implemented its obligations in that field.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: 727Sky
Could you please explain in full, the meaning of your title?
There appear to be words in it which serve no purpose, and it confuses me.
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: 727Sky
originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: tommyjo
Interesting how they only debunk it vs the James Foley video...
Was that the only guy they beheaded?
I saw the original video isis put out, they don't show any sort of beheading process, he just starts sawing at him with no blood, then all of a sudden he's laying down beheaded... why not show it all?