Imminent Strike On Syria by Labor Day Weekend 2018

Recently John Bolton (Deep State) has made some stern warnings to Russia and Syria against Assad utilizing chemical weapons against rebels. For some odd reason, the Russians (propaganda) are trying to pin the blame on the rebels themselves claiming they are being ordered by .... third parties.

In a statement published on Monday, the Russian MoD said it noted the deployment to the Mediterranean last weekend of the missile destroyer USS Ross carrying 28 Tomahawk cruise missiles on board. It came after a similar move of the USS The Sullivans to the Persian Gulf and the rebasing of a B-1B Lancer strategic bomber to an air base in Qatar.

Now Syrian sources are claiming the air defenses are at their highest alert levels, alluding to an imminent attack. Seeing as these kind of things like to occur near American holidays so that we are too busy having fun to care, I am calling it right here folks. Labor day weekend attack on Damascus. I am 50/50 on Israel participating. They tend to just like attacking arbitrarily and are not usually involved in join operations IIRC. But, evolving conditions on a dynamic battlefield are anyone's game.

a reply to: worldstarcountry


Who needs John McCain with Bolton in there? One of the biggest mistakes IMO Trump made by taking in that globalist piece of garbage. I thought Peter King would take over for McCain, but I guess Bolton is stepping up to the plate to line his pockets from the MIC.

a reply to: seeker1963
Where is Graham been lately?? He has a history of being openly aggressive. Have not seen his name pop up lately. Is Lindsey still around? What is he up to , you heard anything??

a reply to: worldstarcountry

If there is an attack where Russia says they have information of one, and there isn't 100% video/satellite/radar evidence of it to determine the perpetrator of the attack I will have to really consider a FF. Russia is basically sharing information of where they determine the attack will occur, there better be 100% increased advanced surveillance there for a while.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: seeker1963
Where is Graham been lately?? He has a history of being openly aggressive. Have not seen his name pop up lately. Is Lindsey still around? What is he up to , you heard anything??

He is a scared little man child! He jumped on the Trump train and now that his partner in crime is gone, he is doing everything he can to act like he supports Trump unequivocally! The day he turns his back on Trump he is finished.

I sent Trump the video of him and McCain when they went to Ukraine to bolster and give a speech to their so called troops.



Look up the Bidens and the money flow they have coming from Ukraine!

This is nothing more than a blatant act of aggression against Syria. America/NATO doesn't even have their bull# excuse that they're "helping rebels and freedom fighters" since they've all surrendered. This war is over. Your terrorist army lost. Go home.

If any other country did this to anyone there would be universal condemnation and probably a coalition to remove the warmongering government from power.

a reply to: Vector99
Well, I am guessing some members here can verify the movement of the destroyers and the Lancer through other niche communities and watchdog groups. We got till this weekend anyways. Its only Tuesday. Russia also states they will shoot down any missile fired at the government and have done so previously as well.

For all we know this is all part of the chess game they play for the optics and are just spending old ordnance so they can replace it with new ones. Whatever chemicals Assad uses, I hope we strike him good swiftly in retribution. That son-of-a-gun liar just can't stop his sick games.

a reply to: seeker1963
ohhh he is manning the Ukraine front I see. Guess that is why it stays low key. Notice nobody talks about Ukraine anymore, when its technically a direct front between NATO and Russia. I am familiar with Biden's interests as well, just not up to date on them.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Vector99
Well, I am guessing some members here can verify the movement of the destroyers and the Lancer through other niche communities and watchdog groups. We got till this weekend anyways. Its only Tuesday. Russia also states they will shoot down any missile fired at the government and have done so previously as well.

For all we know this is all part of the chess game they play for the optics and are just spending old ordnance so they can replace it with new ones. Whatever chemicals Assad uses, I hope we strike him good swiftly in retribution. That son-of-a-gun liar just can't stop his sick games.

Ummmmm, NO! Syria has been in the spotlight for a takeover since at least before or since 2013. Assad is refusing to be a slave to the global banksters and trying to stick to gold just like Gaddafi did. Remember him?

Here is Wesley Clark spilling his guts on not only Syria but many other countries that were in the crosshairs to be taken down.

]]]]]

a reply to: seeker1963
yea I remember all that. I guess it will actually happen though. Makes us pretty damn super if you ask me to be able to just keep pulling this # off.

The banksters seem to still be winning though. They tore apart Libya and Yemen, stole a good chunk of Syria, the important parts of Sudan, Somalia's money is slowly trickling their way, so is Cuba's . Venezuela will probably get bought up in a fire-sale if a successful hit/coup takes out Maduro. I trust Colombia to be able to hold its border well, and profit handsomely of course.

But I still refuse to give them bitches my deposits or electronic usage fees! Whatever chump change that is, I am not giving it to them! Cash only everywhere, barter where accepted.

Bolton’s warning comes as Russian-backed Syrian forces are deploying around Idlib, where tens of thousands of fighters — now dominated by jihadists — are stationed.

Just as before when Russian/Assad's forces where making a final blow / attacking ''freedom fighters/terrorists'' the US steps in defending their investments (freedom fightesr/terrorists) who do the dirty job the US is not willing to do themself (US boots on the ground).

For Assad/Russia winning agains't those terrorists is just the same as loosing, a thing the US can't take very well.

Lets hope it doesn't get that far and it will only remain words but lets see...

a reply to: worldstarcountry


Graham always walked behind McCain on foreign tours. He may not be much of a leader without his buddy.

Maybe so. Assad and Russia have nearly won the proxy war. With renewed air defences after Israel destroyed the originals they stand a chance at defence.

a reply to: and14263
I don't necessarily accept that they won, they still lost a third of Syria to NATO backed forces, which we are continuing to arm heavily and embed with allied troops and bases. I suppose they won if they kept more than half. Idlib is going to be bloody and I have already seen both sides get their front lines in order.

I may start a thread following that offensive the way I did with mosul and raqqa.

A recent update on the Syrian army moving into position for the upcoming offensive, as well as renewed warnings of a threat of chemical attacks followed by accusations and footage from the April strikes as well as some night footage over Damascus of the interceptions made by air defense systems.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: Vector99
Well, I am guessing some members here can verify the movement of the destroyers and the Lancer through other niche communities and watchdog groups. We got till this weekend anyways.

Perfectly routine deployments and especially for the US Navy. The claim of the B-1 at Qatar is also pretty ridiculous as that is where they are based. The B-1B took over from the B-52s for this current deployment earlier this year.

Air Force Times Link

a reply to: tommyjo
Well now it sounds even more plausible. A B1 is certainly more capable over Syrian skies than a B-52 when attacking government targets.

Either way I'd just going to lay off this until the weekend unless something develops during the week. However I am confident enough to make a wager as I feel the probability is over 70%.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

In the case of the B-1B it is strange how the Russian MoD is not informing Russia Today that it was just one B-1B replacing another?

One B-1B call sign MYTEE13 a few days ago flew from US to Qatar. The B-1B that it was replacing call sign MYTEE12 diverted into RAF Mildenhall, UK as it returned from Qatar.

Both B-1Bs fully tracked by aviation enthusiasts using High Frequency communications.

The returning B-1B landing at RAF Mildenhall, Suffolk UK due to a technical problem.

Image at following link.

B-1B landing in the UK. Twitter Link

The B-1Bs rotating to and from Qatar is a perfectly routine event.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

My honest opinion...

It all depends on mueller.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: tommyjo
Well now it sounds even more plausible. A B1 is certainly more capable over Syrian skies than a B-52 when attacking government targets.

Either way I'd just going to lay off this until the weekend unless something develops during the week. However I am confident enough to make a wager as I feel the probability is over 70%.

You are jumping to all the incorrect conclusions. You are failing to understand that the B-1Bs deployment to Qatar is perfectly routine. In this case the single B-1B was replacing another one returning back to the US. They have been there since April and simply one strategic bomber platform replacing another one. Both the B-1B and B-52H are now fulfilling the close air support mission in the various theatres.